IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p7990-d851703.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conflict Identification and Zoning Optimization of “Production-Living-Ecological” Space

Author

Listed:
  • Pengnan Xiao

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Jie Xu

    (Faculty of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Chong Zhao

    (School of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430040, China)

Abstract

With the acceleration of economic and social development and the increasing competition between multi-functional spaces, the coordination and stability of land space have been seriously affected. In order to simulate the conflict pattern of “production, living ecological” space and analyze its evolution characteristics, taking Qianjiang City as the research area and based on the current data of land use, the FLUS (Future Land Use Simulation) model and spatial conflict measurement model are used to calculate the change trend of “production, living ecological” spatial conflict in Qianjiang City in the past and in the future. The research results are of great significance for the scientific use of land space and the optimization of regional development patterns. The results show that: (1) From 2000 to 2020, the level of spatial conflict in Qianjiang City showed an upward trend, the proportion of medium and above conflict units gradually increased, and the conflict level in the study area gradually became dominated by strong conflict. (2) Due to the process of urbanization and the continuous growth of population and GDP (Gross Domestic Product), the construction land in Qianjiang City shows a rapid increase trend under three scenarios, and the cultivated land area shows a downward trend. (3) In 2035, under the three scenarios, the spatial conflict in Qianjiang City will be strengthened, mainly at the level of medium and above. (4) According to the change degree of conflict transformation, 15 change types are divided into five functional zones: ecological protection zone, ecological conservation zone, modern agriculture zone, urban–rural development coordination zone and urban optimization zone.

Suggested Citation

  • Pengnan Xiao & Jie Xu & Chong Zhao, 2022. "Conflict Identification and Zoning Optimization of “Production-Living-Ecological” Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-27, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7990-:d:851703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7990/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7990/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng Tian & Luodan Cao & Jialin Li & Ruiliang Pu & Hongbo Gong & Changda Li, 2020. "Landscape Characteristics and Ecological Risk Assessment Based on Multi-Scenario Simulations: A Case Study of Yancheng Coastal Wetland, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Rongtian Zhang & Jianfei Lu, 2021. "Simulation of Land Use Pattern Evolution from a Multi-Scenario Perspective: A Case Study of Suzhou City in Anhui Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Ahani, Somayeh, 2019. "Land tenure-related conflicts in peri-urban areas: A review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 218-229.
    4. Gao, Yuan & Wang, Jinman & Zhang, Min & Li, Sijia, 2021. "Measurement and prediction of land use conflict in an opencast mining area," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Wackernagel, Mathis & Onisto, Larry & Bello, Patricia & Callejas Linares, Alejandro & Susana Lopez Falfan, Ina & Mendez Garcia, Jesus & Isabel Suarez Guerrero, Ana & Guadalupe Suarez Guerrero, Ma., 1999. "National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 375-390, June.
    6. Jiaxing Cui & Xuesong Kong & Jing Chen & Jianwei Sun & Yuanyuan Zhu, 2021. "Spatially Explicit Evaluation and Driving Factor Identification of Land Use Conflict in Yangtze River Economic Belt," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Bircol, Guilherme Augusto Carminato & Souza, Marcelo Pereira de & Fontes, Aurélio Teodoro & Chiarello, Adriano Garcia & Ranieri, Victor Eduardo Lima, 2018. "Planning by the rules: A fair chance for the environment in a land-use conflict area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 103-112.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiangnan Fan & Yuning Cheng & Yicheng Li, 2023. "Multi-Scenario Land Use Simulation and Land Use Conflict Assessment Based on the CLUMondo Model: A Case Study of Liyang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Yuxin Ren & Xiaotong Feng & Kun Ma & Wen Zhai & Jihong Dong, 2023. "Precise Identification of Site Characteristics and Risk Management of Ningdong Coal Power Base," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Bao Meng & Shaoyao Zhang & Wei Deng & Li Peng & Peng Zhou & Hao Zhang, 2023. "Identification and Analysis of Territorial Spatial Utilization Conflicts in Yibin Based on Multidimensional Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Ling Cheng & Haiyang Cui & Tian Liang & Dan Huang & Yuanxia Su & Zhiyong Zhang & Chuanhao Wen, 2023. "Study on the Trade-Off Synergy Relationship of “Production-Living-Ecological” Functions in Chinese Counties: A Case Study of Chongqing Municipality," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, May.
    5. Xigui Li & Qing Wu & Yujie Liu, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Changes of Cultivated Land System Health Based on PSR-VOR Model—A Case Study of the Two Lake Plains, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-28, January.
    6. Yu Chen & Shuangshuang Liu & Wenbo Ma & Qian Zhou, 2023. "Assessment of the Carrying Capacity and Suitability of Spatial Resources and the Environment and Diagnosis of Obstacle Factors in the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-26, February.
    7. Yangyang Yuan & Yuchen Yang & Ruijun Wang & Yuning Cheng, 2022. "Predicting Rural Ecological Space Boundaries in the Urban Fringe Area Based on Bayesian Network: A Case Study in Nanjing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, October.
    8. Junxiong Mo & Piling Sun & Dandan Shen & Nan Li & Jinye Zhang & Kun Wang, 2023. "Simulation Analysis of Land-Use Spatial Conflict in a Geopark Based on the GMOP–Markov–PLUS Model: A Case Study of Yimengshan Geopark, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junxiong Mo & Piling Sun & Dandan Shen & Nan Li & Jinye Zhang & Kun Wang, 2023. "Simulation Analysis of Land-Use Spatial Conflict in a Geopark Based on the GMOP–Markov–PLUS Model: A Case Study of Yimengshan Geopark, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Yanru Zhao & Xiaomin Zhao & Xinyi Huang & Jiaxin Guo & Guohui Chen, 2022. "Identifying a Period of Spatial Land Use Conflicts and Their Driving Forces in the Pearl River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Guanglong Dong & Yibing Ge & Haiwei Jia & Chuanzhun Sun & Senyuan Pan, 2021. "Land Use Multi-Suitability, Land Resource Scarcity and Diversity of Human Needs: A New Framework for Land Use Conflict Identification," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Guanglong Dong & Jue Wang & Wenxin Zhang & Zheng Liu & Kehua Wang & Weiya Cheng, 2023. "Land Use Conflict Identification Coupled with Ecological Protection Priority in Jinan City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Yan Sun & Xiaoping Ge & Junna Liu & Yuanyuan Chang & Gang-Jun Liu & Fu Chen, 2021. "Mitigating Spatial Conflict of Land Use for Sustainable Wetlands Landscape in Li-Xia-River Region of Central Jiangsu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Onyebueke, Victor & Walker, Julian & Lipietz, Barbara & Ujah, Oliver & Ibezim-Ohaeri, Victoria, 2020. "Urbanisation-induced displacements in peri-urban areas: Clashes between customary tenure and statutory practices in Ugbo-Okonkwo Community in Enugu, Nigeria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Lu Wang & Bonoua Faye & Quanfeng Li & Yunkai Li, 2023. "A Spatio-Temporal Analysis of the Ecological Compensation for Cultivated Land in Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Alvarez-Herranz, Agustin & Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Cantos, José María, 2017. "Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 386-397.
    9. Chen, B. & Chen, G.Q., 2007. "Modified ecological footprint accounting and analysis based on embodied exergy--a case study of the Chinese society 1981-2001," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 355-376, March.
    10. Kleemann, Janina & Struve, Berenike & Spyra, Marcin, 2023. "Conflicts in urban peripheries in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    11. Benjamin Leard, 2011. "Joan Martinez-Alier and Ingo Ropke (eds.): Recent developments in ecological economics (2 vols.)," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 161-178, July.
    12. Maria Serena Mancini & Mikel Evans & Katsunori Iha & Carla Danelutti & Alessandro Galli, 2018. "Assessing the Ecological Footprint of Ecotourism Packages: A Methodological Proposition," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-37, June.
    13. Bao Meng & Shaoyao Zhang & Wei Deng & Li Peng & Peng Zhou & Hao Zhang, 2023. "Identification and Analysis of Territorial Spatial Utilization Conflicts in Yibin Based on Multidimensional Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    14. Ella Furness & Harry Nelson, 2016. "Are human values and community participation key to climate adaptation? The case of community forest organisations in British Columbia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 243-259, March.
    15. Małgorzata Stachowiak & Jerzy Śleszyński, 2002. "How Big Is Ecological Footprint of the Polish Economy?," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 8.
    16. Sirirat Sae Lim & Hong Ngoc Nguyen & Chia-Li Lin, 2022. "Exploring the Development Strategies of Science Parks Using the Hybrid MCDM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-29, April.
    17. Kolcava, Dennis & Nguyen, Quynh & Bernauer, Thomas, 2019. "Does trade liberalization lead to environmental burden shifting in the global economy?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 98-112.
    18. Qian Zuo & Yong Zhou & Jingyi Liu, 2022. "Construction and Optimization Strategy of an Ecological Network in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study in Southwestern Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-27, August.
    19. Jia, Junsong & Deng, Hongbing & Duan, Jing & Zhao, Jingzhu, 2009. "Analysis of the major drivers of the ecological footprint using the STIRPAT model and the PLS method--A case study in Henan Province, China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2818-2824, September.
    20. Hua Liu & Dan-Yang Li & Rong Ma & Ming Ma, 2022. "Assessing the Ecological Risks Based on the Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Model in Gansu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7990-:d:851703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.