IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p7928-d850615.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Economy Development Progress in the Republic of Buryatia (Russia)

Author

Listed:
  • Alexey Bilgaev

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    Baikal Institute of Nature Management, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 670047 Ulan-Ude, Russia)

  • Erzhena Sadykova

    (Baikal Institute of Nature Management, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 670047 Ulan-Ude, Russia)

  • Anna Mikheeva

    (Baikal Institute of Nature Management, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 670047 Ulan-Ude, Russia)

  • Taisiya Bardakhanova

    (Baikal Institute of Nature Management, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 670047 Ulan-Ude, Russia)

  • Svetlana Ayusheeva

    (Baikal Institute of Nature Management, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 670047 Ulan-Ude, Russia)

  • Fujia Li

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    Innovation Academy for Green Manufacture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)

  • Suocheng Dong

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

Under current conditions, the green economy concept has received a comprehensive response in achieving the sustainable development of regions. However, measuring green economic development progress is dynamic, quantitatively characterized by indicators reflecting various aspects. The difficulty lies in a comprehensive environmental sustainability assessment in a context that includes the territory’s environmental, social, and economic factors. The study aimed to assess the progress of the Republic of Buryatia’s (Russia) “green” economic development. The proposed methodology for constructing a composite index is based on five dimensions’ aggregation—resource efficiency, environmental efficiency, environmental quality of life, natural assets, and institutional factors. The composite index helped generalize the complex processes of the region’s environmental–socio–economic development. Its main feature is the reflection of the environmental specificity of the territory. We built a mid-term forecast of the composite and sub-indices, determined their future trend, and assessed the opportunities and conditions for the fastest transition of the Republic of Buryatia to a green economy. The developed composite index is a key tool for regulating green economic development progress, determining prospects, and region management. This paper attempts to fill the gap in a comprehensive assessment of the Republic of Buryatia’s current situation using a composite index.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexey Bilgaev & Erzhena Sadykova & Anna Mikheeva & Taisiya Bardakhanova & Svetlana Ayusheeva & Fujia Li & Suocheng Dong, 2022. "Green Economy Development Progress in the Republic of Buryatia (Russia)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7928-:d:850615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7928/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7928/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexey Bilgaev & Suocheng Dong & Fujia Li & Hao Cheng & Erzhena Sadykova & Anna Mikheeva, 2020. "Assessment of the Current Eco-Socio-Economic Situation of the Baikal Region (Russia) from the Perspective of the Green Economy Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Alexey Bilgaev & Erzhena Sadykova & Fujia Li & Anna Mikheeva & Suocheng Dong, 2021. "Socio-Economic Factor Impact on the Republic of Buryatia (Russia) Green Economic Development Transition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Edward B. Barbier, 2016. "Building the Green Economy," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 42(s1), pages 1-9, November.
    4. D'Amato, D. & Korhonen, J. & Toppinen, A., 2019. "Circular, Green, and Bio Economy: How Do Companies in Land-Use Intensive Sectors Align with Sustainability Concepts?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 116-133.
    5. Andrea De Montis & Vittorio Serra & Amedeo Ganciu & Antonio Ledda, 2020. "Assessing Landscape Fragmentation: A Composite Indicator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Karagiannis, Roxani & Karagiannis, Giannis, 2020. "Constructing composite indicators with Shannon entropy: The case of Human Development Index," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Łukasz Jarosław Kozar & Robert Matusiak & Marta Paduszyńska & Adam Sulich, 2022. "Green Jobs in the EU Renewable Energy Sector: Quantile Regression Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Tennisya Febriyanti Suardi & Lies Sulistyowati & Trisna Insan Noor & Iwan Setiawan, 2022. "Analysis of the Sustainability Level of Smallholder Oil Palm Agribusiness in Labuhanbatu Regency, North Sumatra," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Sebastian Szymon Grzesiak & Adam Sulich, 2023. "Electromobility: Logistics and Business Ecosystem Perspectives Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-27, October.
    4. Yanwei Lyu & Jinning Zhang & Fei Yang & Di Wu, 2022. "The “Local Neighborhood” Effect of Environmental Regulation on Green Innovation Efficiency: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Xiang-Fei Ma & Ru Zhang & Yi-Fan Ruan, 2022. "Evaluation of Common Prosperity Level and Regional Difference Based on the Background of Green Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-13, November.
    6. Jordi Pons-Novell & Montserrat Guillen, 2022. "The Autonomous Capacity of the Elderly Population in Spain for Shopping and Preparing Meals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexey Bilgaev & Erzhena Sadykova & Fujia Li & Anna Mikheeva & Suocheng Dong, 2021. "Socio-Economic Factor Impact on the Republic of Buryatia (Russia) Green Economic Development Transition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Alexey Bilgaev & Suocheng Dong & Fujia Li & Hao Cheng & Arnold Tulohonov & Erzhena Sadykova & Anna Mikheeva, 2020. "Baikal Region (Russia) Development Prospects Based on the Green Economy Principles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Xinyuan Wang & Hao Cheng & Fujia Li & Dashtseren Avirmed & Bair Tsydypov & Menghan Zhang, 2023. "Vulnerability Assessment and Optimization Countermeasures of the Human–Land Coupling System of the China–Mongolia–Russia Cross-Border Transportation Corridor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Łukasz Jarosław Kozar & Robert Matusiak & Marta Paduszyńska & Adam Sulich, 2022. "Green Jobs in the EU Renewable Energy Sector: Quantile Regression Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Julio Plaza Tabasco & Héctor S. Martínez Sánchez-Mateos, 2021. "Integration Versus Fragmentation, the Role of Minor Rural Networks in Rural Cultural Landscapes. A Study-Case in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Abdulkarim Hasan Rashed & Afzal Shah, 2021. "The role of private sector in the implementation of sustainable development goals," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 2931-2948, March.
    7. Vitiana L'Abate & Nicola Raimo & Francesco Albergo & Filippo Vitolla, 2024. "Social media to disseminate circular economy information. An empirical analysis on Twitter," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 528-539, January.
    8. Gümüşsoy, Aleyna & Başyi̇ği̇t, Mikail & Uzun Kart, Elif, 2023. "Economic potential and environmental impact of metal recovery from copper slag flotation tailings," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    9. Dwi Sartika Adetama & Akhmad Fauzi & Bambang Juanda & Dedi Budiman Hakim, 2021. "Measurement of Composites Index on Low Carbon Development Supporting Food Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Evgeny V. Balatsky & Nataly A. Ekimova1, 2021. "Public administration tools: Forecasting vs Designing," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 18-31, March.
    11. Tomas Gabriel Bas & Jacques Gagnon & Philippe Gagnon & Angela Contreras, 2022. "Analysis of Agro Alternatives to Boost Cameroon’s Socio-Environmental Resilience, Sustainable Development, and Conservation of Native Forests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-28, July.
    12. Elena Ionașcu & Marilena Mironiuc & Ion Anghel & Maria Carmen Huian, 2020. "The Involvement of Real Estate Companies in Sustainable Development—An Analysis from the SDGs Reporting Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    13. Emilio Abad-Segura & Ana Batlles-delaFuente & Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña, 2021. "Implications for Sustainability of the Joint Application of Bioeconomy and Circular Economy: A Worldwide Trend Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, June.
    14. Madurai Elavarasan, Rajvikram & Pugazhendhi, Rishi & Irfan, Muhammad & Mihet-Popa, Lucian & Campana, Pietro Elia & Khan, Irfan Ahmad, 2022. "A novel Sustainable Development Goal 7 composite index as the paradigm for energy sustainability assessment: A case study from Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    15. Mastini, Riccardo & Kallis, Giorgos & Hickel, Jason, 2021. "A Green New Deal without growth?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    16. Inesa Mikhno & Viktor Koval & Galyna Shvets & Oksana Garmatiuk & Rima Tamošiūnienė, 2021. "Green Economy in Sustainable Development and Improvement of Resource Efficiency," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2021(1), pages 99-113.
    17. Piotr Kafel & Krzysztof Rudziński, 2024. "The Importance of the Circular Economy Concept among Organizations within the Food Sector and a Management Systems Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Fraccascia, Luca, 2020. "Quantifying the direct network effect for online platforms supporting industrial symbiosis: an agent-based simulation study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    19. Atul Parvatiyar & Jagdish N. Sheth, 2023. "Confronting the deep problem of consumption: Why individual responsibility for mindful consumption matters," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 785-820, April.
    20. Ana Garcia-Bernabeu & José Manuel Cabello & Francisco Ruiz, 2022. "A Reference Point-Based Proposal to Build Regional Quality of Life Composite Indicators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 11-30, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7928-:d:850615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.