IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p12997-d698632.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gamifying App-Based Low-Intensity Psychological Interventions to Prevent Sports Injuries in Young Athletes: A Review and Some Guidelines

Author

Listed:
  • Víctor J. Rubio

    (Department of Biological and Health Psychology, Universidad Autonoma Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain)

  • Aurelio Olmedilla

    (Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatments, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain)

Abstract

Sports injuries have become a real health concern. Particularly noticeable is the increasing number of severe sports injuries among young people. Sports injury (SI) is a multifactorial event where many internal and external, proximal and remote factors play a role in a recursive way, including physical and psychological variables. Accordingly, many voices expressing the need of tackling that and several prevention programs have arisen. Nevertheless, different barriers and limitations prevent a wide extension of well-controlled programs, closely monitored by highly specialized professionals in ordinary sports grass-root organizations. These have helped flourishing different low intensity (LI)-interventions and e-Health apps focusing on both physical warmup, training and fitness, and mental skills aimed at reducing athlete’s vulnerability to SIs. This kind of intervention usually uses self-administered techniques and/or non-specialized staff that can effectively monitoring the program. In fact, LI-interventions have shown to be effective coping with different health and psychological issues. However, these interventions face an important challenge: the lack of engagement people usually show. The current paper proposes how gamification can contribute to the engagement to such interventions. Based on the mechanics–dynamics–aesthetics framework to analyze game design, the paper suggests a set of guidelines app- and web-LI interventions aimed at preventing SIs should include to foster motivation and reduce attrition.

Suggested Citation

  • Víctor J. Rubio & Aurelio Olmedilla, 2021. "Gamifying App-Based Low-Intensity Psychological Interventions to Prevent Sports Injuries in Young Athletes: A Review and Some Guidelines," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:12997-:d:698632
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/12997/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/12997/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robson, Karen & Plangger, Kirk & Kietzmann, Jan H. & McCarthy, Ian & Pitt, Leyland, 2015. "Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 411-420.
    2. Pablo Prieto-González & Jose Luis Martínez-Castillo & Luis Miguel Fernández-Galván & Arturo Casado & Sergio Soporki & Jorge Sánchez-Infante, 2021. "Epidemiology of Sports-Related Injuries and Associated Risk Factors in Adolescent Athletes: An Injury Surveillance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Noël C. Barengo & José Francisco Meneses-Echávez & Robinson Ramírez-Vélez & Daniel Dylan Cohen & Gustavo Tovar & Jorge Enrique Correa Bautista, 2014. "The Impact of the FIFA 11+ Training Program on Injury Prevention in Football Players: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohamed Ahmed Said & Amnah Ahmed Almatar & Mohammed Shaab Alibrahim, 2023. "Higher Sedentary Behaviors and Lower Levels of Specific Knowledge Are Risk Factors for Physical Activity-Related Injuries in Saudi Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Mutule & Marcos Domingues & Fernando Ulloa-Vásquez & Dante Carrizo & Luis García-Santander & Ana-Maria Dumitrescu & Diego Issicaba & Lucas Melo, 2021. "Implementing Smart City Technologies to Inspire Change in Consumer Energy Behaviour," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Athina G. Bright & Stavros T. Ponis, 2021. "Introducing Gamification in the AR-Enhanced Order Picking Process: A Proposed Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Adina Letiţia Negruşa & Valentin Toader & Aurelian Sofică & Mihaela Filofteia Tutunea & Rozalia Veronica Rus, 2015. "Exploring Gamification Techniques and Applications for Sustainable Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-30, August.
    4. Poncin, Ingrid & Garnier, Marion & Ben Mimoun, Mohammed Slim & Leclercq, Thomas, 2017. "Smart technologies and shopping experience: Are gamification interfaces effective? The case of the Smartstore," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 320-331.
    5. Karina Sá & Anselmo Costa e Silva & José Gorla & Andressa Silva & Marília Magno e Silva, 2022. "Injuries in Wheelchair Basketball Players: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-14, May.
    6. Andrea Stevenson Thorpe & Stephen Roper, 2019. "The Ethics of Gamification in a Marketing Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 597-609, March.
    7. Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio & Le Pira, Michela, 2018. "Gamification design to foster stakeholder engagement and behavior change: An application to urban freight transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 119-132.
    8. Haziri Fortesa & Chovancová Miloslava & Fetahu Faton, 2019. "Game mechanics and aesthetics differences for tangible and intangible goods provided via social media," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 772-783, May.
    9. Jesús López-Belmonte & Adrian Segura-Robles & Arturo Fuentes-Cabrera & María Elena Parra-González, 2020. "Evaluating Activation and Absence of Negative Effect: Gamification and Escape Rooms for Learning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-12, March.
    10. Luigino Bruni & Vittorio Pelligra & Tommaso Reggiani & Matteo Rizzolli, 2020. "The Pied Piper: Prizes, Incentives, and Motivation Crowding-in," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 643-658, October.
    11. Täuscher, Karl, 2017. "Leveraging collective intelligence: How to design and manage crowd-based business models," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 237-245.
    12. Mohamed Ahmed Said & Amnah Ahmed Almatar & Mohammed Shaab Alibrahim, 2023. "Higher Sedentary Behaviors and Lower Levels of Specific Knowledge Are Risk Factors for Physical Activity-Related Injuries in Saudi Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Angela Gebert & Markus Gerber & Uwe Pühse & Hanspeter Stamm & Markus Lamprecht, 2019. "Injury Prevention in Amateur Soccer: A Nation-Wide Study on Implementation and Associations with Injury Incidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-10, May.
    14. Chaïma Siala & Abdelmajid Amine, 2022. "Le rôle du retour d’expérience dans la « gamification » des campagnes de crowdsourcing," Post-Print hal-03709625, HAL.
    15. Chih-Wei Lin & Chun-Yu Chien & Chi-Pei Ou Yang & Tso-Yen Mao, 2022. "Encouraging Sustainable Consumption through Gamification in a Branded App: A Study on Consumers’ Behavioral Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. B. I. J. M. Van der Heijden & M. J. Burgers & A. M. Kaan & B. F. Lamberts & K. Migchelbrink & R. C. P. M. Van den Ouweland & T. Meijer, 2020. "Gamification in Dutch Businesses: An Explorative Case Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    17. Nebojša Trajković & Marko Gušić & Slavko Molnar & Draženka Mačak & Dejan M. Madić & Špela Bogataj, 2020. "Short-Term FIFA 11+ Improves Agility and Jump Performance in Young Soccer Players," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-9, March.
    18. Mullins, Jeffrey K. & Sabherwal, Rajiv, 2020. "Gamification: A cognitive-emotional view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 304-314.
    19. Leclercq, Thomas & Poncin, Ingrid & Hammedi, Wafa, 2020. "Opening the black box of gameful experience: Implications for gamification process design," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    20. Haziri Fortesa & Chovancová Miloslava & Fetahu Faton, 2019. "Game mechanics and aesthetics differences for tangible and intangible goods provided via social media," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 176-187, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:12997-:d:698632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.