IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/manmar/v14y2019i2p176-187n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Game mechanics and aesthetics differences for tangible and intangible goods provided via social media

Author

Listed:
  • Haziri Fortesa

    (Tomas Bata University, Zlin, Czech Republic)

  • Chovancová Miloslava

    (Tomas Bata University, Zlin, Czech Republic)

  • Fetahu Faton

    (University “Hasan Prishtina”, Prishtinë, Republic of Kosovo)

Abstract

Companies aspire to fulfil consumers’ needs, wants and desires by offering products and services. Due to globalization and digitization, the world became a small village by facilitating the obtainability of products/services across the globe. Furthermore, the online purchasing via social platforms mirrors the traditional purchasing process. Gamification, game techniques and elements have been employed in the different domain for engaging and motivating consumers, students, end-users in numerous countries and cultures. Gamification is considered the appliance of game techniques and game elements in the non-game environment. It’s been adjusted in different models founded as a need to explore and explain variables, phenomena and theories. Game mechanics as one of the game elements are applied in different disciplines to achieve better performance, fruitful collaboration, active and enthusiastic participation, creating enjoyable, pleasurable and entertaining environment. Aesthetics are described as the sensory part that game evoke within the player. To identify the differences within consumers who purchase via social media when game mechanics and aesthetics are applied, the chi-square test for independence has been employed. The results estimate that the association between products and services as variables is not statistically significant and the relationship between them is weak or moderated. The findings of this research are useful for private companies and other interested stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Haziri Fortesa & Chovancová Miloslava & Fetahu Faton, 2019. "Game mechanics and aesthetics differences for tangible and intangible goods provided via social media," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 176-187, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:14:y:2019:i:2:p:176-187:n:1
    DOI: 10.2478/mmcks-2019-0012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2019-0012
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/mmcks-2019-0012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Junga Kim & Chunsik Lee, 2017. "Examining the role of relationship factors on eWOM effectiveness in social media," International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(2), pages 103-123.
    2. Yahia, Imene Ben & Al-Neama, Nasser & Kerbache, Laoucine, 2018. "Investigating the drivers for social commerce in social media platforms: Importance of trust, social support and the platform perceived usage," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 11-19.
    3. Krishna Akalamkam & Joy Kumar Mitra, 2018. "Consumer Pre-purchase Search in Online Shopping: Role of Offline and Online Information Sources," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 6(1), pages 42-60, January.
    4. Díaz, Asunción & Gómez, Mar & Molina, Arturo, 2017. "A comparison of online and offline consumer behaviour: An empirical study on a cinema shopping context," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 44-50.
    5. Robson, Karen & Plangger, Kirk & Kietzmann, Jan H. & McCarthy, Ian & Pitt, Leyland, 2015. "Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 411-420.
    6. Swani, Kunal & Milne, George R., 2017. "Evaluating Facebook brand content popularity for service versus goods offerings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 123-133.
    7. Hofacker, Charles F. & de Ruyter, Ko & Lurie, Nicholas H. & Manchanda, Puneet & Donaldson, Jeff, 2016. "Gamification and Mobile Marketing Effectiveness," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 25-36.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haziri Fortesa & Chovancová Miloslava & Fetahu Faton, 2019. "Game mechanics and aesthetics differences for tangible and intangible goods provided via social media," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 772-783, May.
    2. Leclercq, Thomas & Poncin, Ingrid & Hammedi, Wafa, 2020. "Opening the black box of gameful experience: Implications for gamification process design," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    3. Eppmann, René & Bekk, Magdalena & Klein, Kristina, 2018. "Gameful Experience in Gamification: Construction and Validation of a Gameful Experience Scale [GAMEX]," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 98-115.
    4. Leclercq, Thomas & Hammedi, Wafa & Poncin, Ingrid, 2018. "The Boundaries of Gamification for Engaging Customers: Effects of Losing a Contest in Online Co-creation Communities," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 82-101.
    5. Obeidat, Zaid Mohammad & Xiao, Sarah Hong & Qasem, Zainah al & dweeri, Rami al & Obeidat, Ahmad, 2018. "Social media revenge: A typology of online consumer revenge," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 239-255.
    6. Mary Beth McCabe & Richard Weaver, 2018. "Social Media Marketing Strategies For Educational Programs," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 12(2), pages 53-62.
    7. Xiaoyu Xu & Luyao Wang & Kai Zhao, 2020. "Exploring Determinants of Consumers’ Platform Usage in “Double Eleven” Shopping Carnival in China: Cognition and Emotion from an Integrated Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Dominique Carry & Valérie-Inès de La Ville, 2021. "Process of adopting a personal data portability service: highlighting the ambiguity perceived by young users [Processus d’adoption d’un service de portabilité des données personnelles : mise en lum," Post-Print hal-03328025, HAL.
    9. Kunal Swani & Lauren I. Labrecque, 2020. "Like, Comment, or Share? Self-presentation vs. brand relationships as drivers of social media engagement choices," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 279-298, September.
    10. Razaz Waheeb Attar & Ahlam Almusharraf & Areej Alfawaz & Nick Hajli, 2022. "New Trends in E-Commerce Research: Linking Social Commerce and Sharing Commerce: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-38, November.
    11. Michał Bańka & Jakub Daniłowski & Mirosław Czerliński & Jakub Murawski & Renata Żochowska & Aleksander Sobota, 2022. "A Feedback Analysis Automation Using Business Intelligence Technology in Companies Organizing Urban Public Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.
    12. Anna Mutule & Marcos Domingues & Fernando Ulloa-Vásquez & Dante Carrizo & Luis García-Santander & Ana-Maria Dumitrescu & Diego Issicaba & Lucas Melo, 2021. "Implementing Smart City Technologies to Inspire Change in Consumer Energy Behaviour," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    13. Syrjälä, Henna & Kauppinen-Räisänen, Hannele & Luomala, Harri T. & Joelsson, Tapani N. & Könnölä, Kaisa & Mäkilä, Tuomas, 2020. "Gamified package: Consumer insights into multidimensional brand engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 423-434.
    14. Feng, Wenting & Tu, Rungting & Hsieh, Peishan, 2020. "Can gamification increases consumers’ engagement in fitness apps? The moderating role of commensurability of the game elements," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    15. Athina G. Bright & Stavros T. Ponis, 2021. "Introducing Gamification in the AR-Enhanced Order Picking Process: A Proposed Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Adina Letiţia Negruşa & Valentin Toader & Aurelian Sofică & Mihaela Filofteia Tutunea & Rozalia Veronica Rus, 2015. "Exploring Gamification Techniques and Applications for Sustainable Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-30, August.
    17. Jian Wang & Fakhar Shahzad & Zeeshan Ahmad & Muhammad Abdullah & Nadir Munir Hassan, 2022. "Trust and Consumers’ Purchase Intention in a Social Commerce Platform: A Meta-Analytic Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    18. Tafesse, Wondwesen, 2021. "Communicating crowdfunding campaigns: How message strategy, vivid media use and product type influence campaign success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 252-263.
    19. Matej Kovač & Vesna Žabkar, 2020. "Do Social Media and E-Mail Engagement Impact Reputation and Trust-Driven Behavior?," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 32(1), pages 9-25.
    20. Xi, Nannan & Hamari, Juho, 2020. "Does gamification affect brand engagement and equity? A study in online brand communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 449-460.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:14:y:2019:i:2:p:176-187:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.