IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p12980-d698250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of Combustion Properties in Biomass–Coal Blends Using Characteristic and Kinetic Analyses

Author

Listed:
  • Yalin Wang

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • Beibei Yan

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
    Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, Ministry of Education, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Yu Wang

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • Jiahao Zhang

    (Bahen Centre for Information Technology, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, 40 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 2E4, Canada)

  • Xiaozhong Chen

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Rob J. M. Bastiaans

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

Abstract

This paper presents comparative research on the combustion of coal, wheat, corn straw (CS), beet residues after extracting sugar (BR), and their blends, coal–corn straw blends (CCSBs), coal–wheat blends (CWBs), and coal–beet residue blends (CBRBs), using thermogravimetric (TG) analysis under 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 °C/min. The test results indicate that CS and wheat show better combustion properties than BR, which are recommended to be used in biomass combustion. Under the heating rate of 20 °C/min, the coal has the longest thermal reaction time when compared with 10 and 30 °C/min. Adding coal to the biomass can improve the burnout level of biomass materials (BM), reduce the burning speed, and make the reaction more thorough. The authors employed the Flynn–Wall–Ozawa (FWO) method and the Kissinger–Akahira–Sunose (KAS) method to calculate kinetics parameters. It was proven that overall, the FWO method is better than the KAS method for coal, BM, and coal–biomass blends (CBBs), as it provides higher correlations in this study. It is shown that adding coal to wheat and BR decreases the activation energy and makes conversion more stable under particular α . The authors selected a wider range of biomass raw materials, made more kinds of CBB, and conducted more studies on different heating rates. This research can provide useful insights into how to choose agricultural residuals and how to use them.

Suggested Citation

  • Yalin Wang & Beibei Yan & Yu Wang & Jiahao Zhang & Xiaozhong Chen & Rob J. M. Bastiaans, 2021. "A Comparison of Combustion Properties in Biomass–Coal Blends Using Characteristic and Kinetic Analyses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:12980-:d:698250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/12980/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/12980/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gil, M.V. & Riaza, J. & Álvarez, L. & Pevida, C. & Pis, J.J. & Rubiera, F., 2012. "Kinetic models for the oxy-fuel combustion of coal and coal/biomass blend chars obtained in N2 and CO2 atmospheres," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 510-518.
    2. Lu, Jau-Jang & Chen, Wei-Hsin, 2015. "Investigation on the ignition and burnout temperatures of bamboo and sugarcane bagasse by thermogravimetric analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 49-57.
    3. Guo, Feihong & He, Yi & Hassanpour, Ali & Gardy, Jabbar & Zhong, Zhaoping, 2020. "Thermogravimetric analysis on the co-combustion of biomass pellets with lignite and bituminous coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    4. Laougé, Zakari Boubacar & Merdun, Hasan, 2021. "Investigation of thermal behavior of pine sawdust and coal during co-pyrolysis and co-combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bahareh Vafakish & Amin Babaei-Ghazvini & Mahmood Ebadian & Bishnu Acharya, 2023. "Pyrolysis and Combustion Behavior of Flax Straw as Biomass: Evaluation of Kinetic, Thermodynamic Parameters, and Qualitative Analysis of Degradation Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Hongli Chen & Liqiang Zhang & Zhongliang Huang & Zijian Wu & Mengjiao Tan & Xuan Zhang & Longbo Jiang & Xiaoli Qin & Jing Huang & Hui Li, 2022. "Effect of Anoxic Atmosphere on the Physicochemical and Pelletization Properties of Pinus massoniana Sawdust during Storage," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Jingyu & Hang, Gai & Song, Jiajia & Lu, Shiping & Ming, Hanqi & Chang, Jiaming & Deng, Jun & Zhang, Yanni & Shu, Chi-Min, 2023. "Spontaneous oxidation kinetics of weathered coal based upon thermogravimetric characteristics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    2. Mostafa, Mohamed E. & He, Limo & Xu, Jun & Hu, Song & Wang, Yi & Su, Sheng & Hu, Xun & Elsayed, Saad A. & Xiang, Jun, 2019. "Investigating the effect of integrated CO2 and H2O on the reactivity and kinetics of biomass pellets oxy-steam combustion using new double parallel volumetric model (DVM)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 343-357.
    3. Granados, David A. & Chejne, Farid & Mejía, Juan M. & Gómez, Carlos A. & Berrío, Ariel & Jurado, William J., 2014. "Effect of flue gas recirculation during oxy-fuel combustion in a rotary cement kiln," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 615-625.
    4. Śliz, Maciej & Wilk, Małgorzata, 2020. "A comprehensive investigation of hydrothermal carbonization: Energy potential of hydrochar derived from Virginia mallow," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 942-950.
    5. Sun, Youhong & Bai, Fengtian & Lü, Xiaoshu & Jia, Chunxia & Wang, Qing & Guo, Mingyi & Li, Qiang & Guo, Wei, 2015. "Kinetic study of Huadian oil shale combustion using a multi-stage parallel reaction model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 705-713.
    6. Hillig, Débora Moraes & Pohlmann, Juliana Gonçalves & Manera, Christian & Perondi, Daniele & Pereira, Fernando Marcelo & Altafini, Carlos Roberto & Godinho, Marcelo, 2020. "Evaluation of the structural changes of a char produced by slow pyrolysis of biomass and of a high-ash coal during its combustion and their role in the reactivity and flue gas emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    7. Zhao, Jingyu & Wang, Tao & Deng, Jun & Shu, Chi-Min & Zeng, Qiang & Guo, Tao & Zhang, Yuxuan, 2020. "Microcharacteristic analysis of CH4 emissions under different conditions during coal spontaneous combustion with high-temperature oxidation and in situ FTIR," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    8. Jiang, Chunlong & Lin, Qizhao & Wang, Chengxin & Jiang, Xuedan & Bi, Haobo & Bao, Lin, 2020. "Experimental study of the ignition and combustion characteristics of cattle manure under different environmental conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    9. Leandro C. de Morais & Amanda A. Maia & Pedro R. Resende & André H. Rosa & Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2022. "Thermochemical Conversion of Sugarcane Bagasse: A Comprehensive Analysis of Ignition and Burnout Temperatures," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-11, November.
    10. Kuan, Yong-Hao & Wu, Fang-Hsien & Chen, Guan-Bang & Lin, Hsien-Tsung & Lin, Ta-Hui, 2020. "Study of the combustion characteristics of sewage sludge pyrolysis oil, heavy fuel oil, and their blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    11. Wang, Kai & Hu, Lihong & Deng, Jun & Zhang, Yanni, 2023. "Multiscale thermal behavioral characterization of spontaneous combustion of pre-oxidized coal with different air exposure time," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    12. Laougé, Zakari Boubacar & Merdun, Hasan, 2021. "Investigation of thermal behavior of pine sawdust and coal during co-pyrolysis and co-combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    13. Małgorzata Sieradzka & Agata Mlonka-Mędrala & Izabela Kalemba-Rec & Markus Reinmöller & Felix Küster & Wojciech Kalawa & Aneta Magdziarz, 2022. "Evaluation of Physical and Chemical Properties of Residue from Gasification of Biomass Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Leonel J. R. Nunes & Abel M. Rodrigues & João C. O. Matias & Ana I. Ferraz & Ana C. Rodrigues, 2021. "Production of Biochar from Vine Pruning: Waste Recovery in the Wine Industry," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Xu, Li & Li, Shengcai & Sun, Wanghu & Ma, Xin & Cao, Shuchao, 2020. "Combustion behaviors and characteristic parameters determination of sassafras wood under different heating conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    16. Mau, Vivian & Gross, Amit, 2018. "Energy conversion and gas emissions from production and combustion of poultry-litter-derived hydrochar and biochar," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 510-519.
    17. Liu, Jiazheng & Zhong, Fei & Niu, Wenjuan & Su, Jing & Gao, Ziqi & Zhang, Kai, 2019. "Effects of heating rate and gas atmosphere on the pyrolysis and combustion characteristics of different crop residues and the kinetics analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 320-332.
    18. Riaz, Sajid & Oluwoye, Ibukun & Al-Abdeli, Yasir M., 2022. "Oxidative torrefaction of densified woody biomass: Performance, combustion kinetics and thermodynamics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 908-918.
    19. Wan, Kaidi & Vervisch, Luc & Gao, Zhenxun & Domingo, Pascale & Jiang, Chongwen & Xia, Jun & Wang, Zhihua, 2020. "Development of reduced and optimized reaction mechanism for potassium emissions during biomass combustion based on genetic algorithms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    20. Gil, María V. & Riaza, Juan & Álvarez, Lucía & Pevida, Covadonga & Rubiera, Fernando, 2015. "Biomass devolatilization at high temperature under N2 and CO2: Char morphology and reactivity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 655-662.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:12980-:d:698250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.