IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i9p3146-d352586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implication of Vaginal and Cesarean Section Delivery Method in Black–White Differentials in Infant Mortality in the United States: Linked Birth/Infant Death Records, 2007–2016

Author

Listed:
  • Laurens Holmes Jr.

    (Nemours Children’s Health System, Wilmington, DE 19802, USA
    Department of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA)

  • Leah O’Neill

    (Nemours Children’s Health System, Wilmington, DE 19802, USA
    Department of Molecular Biology & Chemistry, Christopher Newport University, Newport News, VA 23606, USA)

  • Hikma Elmi

    (Nemours Children’s Health System, Wilmington, DE 19802, USA)

  • Chinaka Chinacherem

    (Nemours Children’s Health System, Wilmington, DE 19802, USA)

  • Camillia Comeaux

    (Nemours Children’s Health System, Wilmington, DE 19802, USA
    College of Pharmaceutical Science, Institute of Public Health, Florida A & M University, Tallahassee, FL 32307, USA)

  • Lavisha Pelaez

    (Nemours Children’s Health System, Wilmington, DE 19802, USA)

  • Kirk W. Dabney

    (Nemours Children’s Health System, Wilmington, DE 19802, USA)

  • Olumuyiwa Akinola

    (Nemours Children’s Health System, Wilmington, DE 19802, USA)

  • Michael Enwere

    (Nemours Children’s Health System, Wilmington, DE 19802, USA
    Department of Public Health, Walden University, Minneapolis, MN 55401, USA)

Abstract

Racial/ethnic disparities in infant mortality (IM) continue to persist in the United States, with Black/African Americans (AA) being disproportionally affected with a three-fold increase in mortality compared to Whites. Epidemiological data have identified maternal characteristics in IM risk such as preeclampsia, eclampsia, maternal education, smoking, maternal weight, maternal socioeconomic status (SES), and family structure. Understanding the social gradient in health including implicit bias, as inherent in the method of labor and delivery and the racial heterogeneity, may facilitate intervention mapping in narrowing the Black–White IM risk differences. We aimed to assess the temporal/racial trends and the methods of delivery, mainly vaginal vs. cesarean section (C-section) as an exposure function of IM. The United States linked birth/infant death records (2007–2016) were used with a cross-sectional ecological design. The analysis involved chi squared statistic, incidence rate estimation by binomial regression model, and period percent change. Of the 40,445,070 births between 2007 and 2016, cumulative mortality incidence was 249,135 (1.16 per 1000). The IM rate was highest among Black/AA (11.41 per 1000), intermediate among Whites (5.19 per 1000), and lowest among Asian /Pacific Islanders (4.24 per 1000). The cumulative incidence rate difference, comparing vaginal to cesarean procedure was 1.73 per 1000 infants, implying excess IM with C-section. Compared to C-section, there was a 31% decreased risk of IM among mothers with vaginal delivery, rate ratio (RR) = 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64–0.74. Racial disparities were observed in the method of delivery associated with IM. Black/AA mothers with vaginal delivery had a 6% decreased risk of IM compared to C-section, RR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.92–0.95, while Whites with vaginal delivery had a 38% decrease risk of IM relative to C-section, RR= 0.68, 95% CI: 0.67–0.69, p < 0.001. Infant mortality varied by race, with Black/AA disproportionally affected, which is explained in part by labor and delivery procedures, suggestive of reliable and equitable intrapartum assessment of Black/AA mothers during labor, as well as implicit bias marginalization in the healthcare system.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurens Holmes Jr. & Leah O’Neill & Hikma Elmi & Chinaka Chinacherem & Camillia Comeaux & Lavisha Pelaez & Kirk W. Dabney & Olumuyiwa Akinola & Michael Enwere, 2020. "Implication of Vaginal and Cesarean Section Delivery Method in Black–White Differentials in Infant Mortality in the United States: Linked Birth/Infant Death Records, 2007–2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3146-:d:352586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3146/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3146/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laurens Holmes & Emily Shutman & Chinacherem Chinaka & Kerti Deepika & Lavisha Pelaez & Kirk W. Dabney, 2019. "Aberrant Epigenomic Modulation of Glucocorticoid Receptor Gene (NR3C1) in Early Life Stress and Major Depressive Disorder Correlation: Systematic Review and Quantitative Evidence Synthesis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Daniel Kim & Adrianna Saada, 2013. "The Social Determinants of Infant Mortality and Birth Outcomes in Western Developed Nations: A Cross-Country Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-40, June.
    3. Timothy Gage & Fu Fang & Erin O’Neill & Greg DiRienzo, 2013. "Maternal Education, Birth Weight, and Infant Mortality in the United States," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 50(2), pages 615-635, April.
    4. Laurens Holmes & Chinacherem Chinaka & Hikma Elmi & Kerti Deepika & Lavisha Pelaez & Michael Enwere & Olumuyiwa T. Akinola & Kirk W. Dabney, 2019. "Implication of Spiritual Network Support System in Epigenomic Modulation and Health Trajectory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-17, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kenzie Latham-Mintus & Brittney Ortiz & Ashley Irby & Jack Turman, 2024. "Supporting the Development of Grassroots Maternal and Childhood Health Leaders through a Public-Health-Informed Training Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(4), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Schochet, Owen N. & Johnson, Anna D. & Ryan, Rebecca M., 2020. "The relationship between increases in low-income mothers’ education and children’s early outcomes: Variation by developmental stage and domain," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    3. Böckerman, Petri & Conlin, Andrew & Svento, Rauli, 2021. "Early health, risk aversion and stock market participation," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    4. Abdelmoumene Benabid & Lara Deslauriers & Isabelle Sinclair & Myriane St-Pierre & Cathy Vaillancourt & Sonia Gagnon & Kelsey N. Dancause, 2021. "Relationships between Objectively Measured Sedentary Behavior during Pregnancy and Infant Birthweight," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Noghanibehambari, Hamid, 2022. "Intergenerational health effects of Medicaid," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    6. Roman Pabayo & Amy Ehntholt & Daniel M. Cook & Megan Reynolds & Peter Muennig & Sze Y. Liu, 2020. "Laws Restricting Access to Abortion Services and Infant Mortality Risk in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Ning Wei & Lülin Zhou & Wenhao Huang, 2022. "Does an upward intergenerational educational spillover effect exist? The effect of children’s education on Chinese parents’ health," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 69-89, March.
    8. Shrestha, Vinish, 2020. "Maternal education and infant health gradient: New answers to old questions," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    9. Wen Fan & Liying Luo, 2020. "Understanding Trends in the Concentration of Infant Mortality Among Disadvantaged White and Black Mothers in the United States, 1983–2013: A Decomposition Analysis," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(3), pages 979-1005, June.
    10. Maeve E. Wallace & Carmen Green & Lisa Richardson & Katherine Theall & Joia Crear-Perry, 2017. "“Look at the Whole Me”: A Mixed-Methods Examination of Black Infant Mortality in the US through Women’s Lived Experiences and Community Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, July.
    11. Owen N. Schochet & Anna D. Johnson, 2019. "The Impact of Child Care Subsidies on Mothers’ Education Outcomes," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 367-389, September.
    12. Homa Pourriyahi & Niloufar Yazdanpanah & Amene Saghazadeh & Nima Rezaei, 2021. "Loneliness: An Immunometabolic Syndrome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-24, November.
    13. De Neve, Jan-Walter & Kawachi, Ichiro, 2017. "Spillovers between siblings and from offspring to parents are understudied: A review and future directions for research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 56-61.
    14. Laurens Holmes & Michael Enwere & Janille Williams & Benjamin Ogundele & Prachi Chavan & Tatiana Piccoli & Chinacherem Chinaka & Camillia Comeaux & Lavisha Pelaez & Osatohamwen Okundaye & Leslie Staln, 2020. "Black–White Risk Differentials in COVID-19 (SARS-COV2) Transmission, Mortality and Case Fatality in the United States: Translational Epidemiologic Perspective and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Abayomi Samuel Oyekale, 2023. "Utilization of Proximate Healthcare Facilities and Children’s Wait Times in Senegal: An IV-Tobit Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(21), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Tiffany Green & Tod Hamilton, 2019. "Maternal educational attainment and infant mortality in the United States: Does the gradient vary by race/ethnicity and nativity?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 41(25), pages 713-752.
    17. Samuel Fishman, 2020. "An extended evaluation of the weathering hypothesis for birthweight," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(31), pages 929-968.
    18. Claire Leppold & Shuhei Nomura & Toyoaki Sawano & Akihiko Ozaki & Masaharu Tsubokura & Sarah Hill & Yukio Kanazawa & Hiroshi Anbe, 2017. "Birth Outcomes after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Disaster: A Long-Term Retrospective Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3146-:d:352586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.