IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i18p6501-d409882.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tree Canopy Cover Is Best Associated with Perceptions of Greenspace: A Short Communication

Author

Listed:
  • Soumya Mazumdar

    (South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales Medicine, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
    Population Health, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia)

  • Alison Dunshea

    (Population Health, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia)

  • Shanley Chong

    (South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales Medicine, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
    Population Health, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia)

  • Bin Jalaludin

    (Population Health, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
    School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia)

Abstract

A growing literature has supported a relationship between greenspace and health. Various greenspace metrics exist; some are based on subjective measures while others are based on an objective assessment of the landscape. While subjective measures may better reflect individual feelings about surrounding greenspace and the resulting positive benefits thereof, they are expensive and difficult to collect. In contrast, objective measures can be derived with relative ease, in a timely fashion, and for large regions and populations. While there have been some attempts to compare objective and subjective measures of greenspace, what is lacking is a comprehensive assessment of a wide range of greenspace metrics against subjective measures of greenspace. We performed such an assessment using a set of three objective greenspace metrics and a survey of residents in Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia. Our study supported existing findings in that overall, there is very little agreement between perceived and objective greenspace metrics. We also found that tree canopy in 10 min walking buffers around residences was the objective greenspace measure in best agreement with perceived greenspace.

Suggested Citation

  • Soumya Mazumdar & Alison Dunshea & Shanley Chong & Bin Jalaludin, 2020. "Tree Canopy Cover Is Best Associated with Perceptions of Greenspace: A Short Communication," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-9, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6501-:d:409882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6501/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6501/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mireia Gascon & Margarita Triguero-Mas & David Martínez & Payam Dadvand & Joan Forns & Antoni Plasència & Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen, 2015. "Mental Health Benefits of Long-Term Exposure to Residential Green and Blue Spaces: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Md. Kamruzzaman & Simon Washington & Douglas Baker & Wendy Brown & Billie Giles-Corti & Gavin Turrell, 2016. "Built environment impacts on walking for transport in Brisbane, Australia," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 53-77, January.
    3. Colleen E. Reid & Jane E. Clougherty & Jessie L.C. Shmool & Laura D. Kubzansky, 2017. "Is All Urban Green Space the Same? A Comparison of the Health Benefits of Trees and Grass in New York City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Md. Kamruzzaman & Simon Washington & Douglas Baker & Wendy Brown & Billie Giles-Corti & Gavin Turrell, 2016. "Built environment impacts on walking for transport in Brisbane, Australia," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 53-77, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Faysal Kabir Shuvo & Soumya Mazumdar & S. M. Labib, 2021. "Walkability and Greenness Do Not Walk Together: Investigating Associations between Greenness and Walkability in a Large Metropolitan City Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Joy L. Hart & Ray A. Yeager & Daniel W. Riggs & Daniel Fleischer & Ugochukwu Owolabi & Kandi L. Walker & Aruni Bhatnagar & Rachel J. Keith, 2022. "The Relationship between Perceptions and Objective Measures of Greenness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Soumya Mazumdar & Shanley Chong & Thomas Astell-Burt & Xiaoqi Feng & Geoffrey Morgan & Bin Jalaludin, 2021. "Which Green Space Metric Best Predicts a Lowered Odds of Type 2 Diabetes?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-13, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eric T. H. Chan & Tim Schwanen & David Banister, 2021. "The role of perceived environment, neighbourhood characteristics, and attitudes in walking behaviour: evidence from a rapidly developing city in China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 431-454, February.
    2. Kajosaari, Anna & Hasanzadeh, Kamyar & Kyttä, Marketta, 2019. "Residential dissonance and walking for transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 134-144.
    3. Phi-Yen Nguyen & Thomas Astell-Burt & Hania Rahimi-Ardabili & Xiaoqi Feng, 2021. "Green Space Quality and Health: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-38, October.
    4. Lin, Tao & Wang, Donggen & Guan, Xiaodong, 2017. "The built environment, travel attitude, and travel behavior: Residential self-selection or residential determination?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 111-122.
    5. Matthew H. E. M. Browning & Alessandro Rigolon, 2019. "School Green Space and Its Impact on Academic Performance: A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Cheng, Long & Shi, Kunbo & De Vos, Jonas & Cao, Mengqiu & Witlox, Frank, 2021. "Examining the spatially heterogeneous effects of the built environment on walking among older adults," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 21-30.
    7. Phani Kumar, P. & Ravi Sekhar, Ch. & Parida, Manoranjan, 2018. "Residential dissonance in TOD neighborhoods," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 166-177.
    8. Kamruzzaman, Md. & Aston, Laura & Baker, Douglas & Braun, Boris & Shatu, Farjana, 2021. "Changes in land use typology of global airports: An empirical investigation with implications for the aerotropolis concept," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. Faan Chen & Adriano Borges Costa, 2024. "Exploring the causal effects of the built environment on travel behavior: a unique randomized experiment in Shanghai," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 215-245, February.
    10. De Vos, Jonas & Ettema, Dick & Witlox, Frank, 2018. "Changing travel behaviour and attitudes following a residential relocation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 131-147.
    11. Lin Zhang & Suhong Zhou & Lanlan Qi & Yue Deng, 2022. "Nonlinear Effects of the Neighborhood Environments on Residents’ Mental Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Donggen Wang & Tao Lin, 2019. "Built environment, travel behavior, and residential self-selection: a study based on panel data from Beijing, China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 51-74, February.
    13. Li, Jianling, 2018. "Residential and transit decisions: Insights from focus groups of neighborhoods around transit stations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-9.
    14. Van Acker, Véronique & Mulley, Corinne & Ho, Loan, 2019. "Impact of childhood experiences on public transport travel behaviour," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 783-798.
    15. Matthew H. E. M. Browning & Alessandro Rigolon, 2018. "Do Income, Race and Ethnicity, and Sprawl Influence the Greenspace-Human Health Link in City-Level Analyses? Findings from 496 Cities in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, July.
    16. Dimitris Milakis & Dimitrios Efthymiou & Constantinos Antoniou, 2017. "Built Environment, Travel Attitudes and Travel Behaviour: Quasi-Longitudinal Analysis of Links in the Case of Greeks Relocating from US to Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Sharmin, Samia & Kamruzzaman, Md., 2017. "Association between the built environment and children's independent mobility: A meta-analytic review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 104-117.
    18. Guzman, Luis A. & Peña, Javier & Carrasco, Juan Antonio, 2020. "Assessing the role of the built environment and sociodemographic characteristics on walking travel distances in Bogotá," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    19. Li, Jingjing & Auchincloss, Amy H. & Yang, Yong & Rodriguez, Daniel A. & Sánchez, Brisa N., 2020. "Neighborhood characteristics and transport walking: Exploring multiple pathways of influence using a structural equation modeling approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    20. Yang, Haoran & Zhang, Qinran & Helbich, Marco & Lu, Yi & He, Dongsheng & Ettema, Dick & Chen, Long, 2022. "Examining non-linear associations between built environments around workplace and adults’ walking behaviour in Shanghai, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 234-246.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6501-:d:409882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.