IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i16p5657-d394989.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Comparison of Perfectionism and Commitment between Professional and Amateur Golfers and the Association between Perfectionism and Commitment in the Two Groups

Author

Listed:
  • Jae Jun Nam

    (Department of Golf, Korea Golf University, Hoeng Seong, Gang won-do 25247, Korea)

  • Doug Hyun Han

    (Department of Psychiatry, Chung Ang University Hospital, Heuckseok Ro 102, Dong Jack Gu, Seoul 06973, Korea)

Abstract

This study investigated differences in perfectionist traits and commitment between professional and amateur golfers, as well as correlations among perfectionist traits, commitment, and golf handicap. Using simple random sampling, 486 professional golfers (mean age = 22.1 ± 3.0, 52.1% female) and 233 amateur golfers (mean age = 44.8 ± 10.2, 55.8% female) were recruited and assessed using the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS) and Expansion of Sports Commitment Model (ESCM). An ANCOVA, controlling for age, golf career length, and training time, revealed lower MPS self-oriented scores (10.3%; F = 8.9, p < 0.01; effect size [ES] = 0.498) and higher ESCM-Cognition (12.6%; F = 9.4, p < 0.01; ES = 0.691) and ESCM-Behavior (9.4%; F = 4.6, p = 0.03; ES = 0.479) scores in professional golfers than in amateur golfers. In partial correlations controlling for age, golf career length, and training time, professional golfers’ MPS scores were negatively associated with ESCM-Cognition scores ( r = -0.30, p < 0.001). Professional golfers’ mean golf handicap was positively correlated with MPS total ( r = 0.33, p < 0.01). Altogether, golfers seeking to attain high levels of performance must consider the mental aspect of golfing and find ways to maximize commitment levels while minimizing perfectionist traits.

Suggested Citation

  • Jae Jun Nam & Doug Hyun Han, 2020. "The Comparison of Perfectionism and Commitment between Professional and Amateur Golfers and the Association between Perfectionism and Commitment in the Two Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:16:p:5657-:d:394989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/16/5657/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/16/5657/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter H. Westfall, 2014. "Kurtosis as Peakedness, 1905-2014. R.I.P," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(3), pages 191-195, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jani Saastamoinen & Hanna Savolainen, 2021. "Does a leopard change its spots? Auditors and lawyers as valuation experts for minority shareholders in the judicial appraisal of private firms," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3-4), pages 613-636, March.
    2. Shige Makino & Christine M. Chan, 2017. "Skew and heavy-tail effects on firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(8), pages 1721-1740, August.
    3. Papadopoulos, Alecos & Parmeter, Christopher F., 2021. "Type II failure and specification testing in the Stochastic Frontier Model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 990-1001.
    4. A. H. Nzokem, 2023. "Bitcoin versus S&P 500 Index: Return and Risk Analysis," Papers 2310.02436, arXiv.org.
    5. Vasyl Kovalchuk & Vladimir I. Pulov & Ivaïlo M. Mladenov, 2023. "Mylar Balloon and Associated Geometro-Mechanical Moments," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Mike Thelwall, 2019. "The influence of highly cited papers on field normalised indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(2), pages 519-537, February.
    7. Andrea Bastianin, 2020. "Robust measures of skewness and kurtosis for macroeconomic and financial time series," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(7), pages 637-670, February.
    8. Ricardo Santos & Samuel Pereira & Elísio Brandão, 2016. "Transfer Pricing Aggressiveness And Financial Derivatives Practices: Empirical Evidences From United Kingdom," FEP Working Papers 583, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    9. Ali, Irfan, 2016. "The impact of ERP implementation on the financial performance of the firm : An empirical study," Other publications TiSEM 876506f5-1aed-4421-aa2c-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Jorge M. Uribe, 2018. "“Scaling Down Downside Risk with Inter-Quantile Semivariances”," IREA Working Papers 201826, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Oct 2018.
    11. Liu, Xiaochun, 2019. "On tail fatness of macroeconomic dynamics," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    12. Hui Tian & Andrew Yim & David P. Newton, 2021. "Tail-Heaviness, Asymmetry, and Profitability Forecasting by Quantile Regression," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 5209-5233, August.
    13. Jenny P. Danna-Buitrago & Rémi Stellian, 2022. "A New Class of Revealed Comparative Advantage Indexes," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 477-503, July.
    14. Du, Ruijin & Dong, Gaogao & Tian, Lixin & Wang, Yougui & Zhao, Longfeng & Zhang, Xin & Vilela, André L.M. & Stanley, H. Eugene, 2019. "Identifying the peak point of systemic risk in international crude oil importing trade," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 281-291.
    15. Liang, Zhenglin & Liu, Bin & Xie, Min & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar, 2020. "Condition-based maintenance for long-life assets with exposure to operational and environmental risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    16. Faris Alshubiri, 2021. "Portfolio Returns of Islamic Indices and Stock Prices in GCC Countries: Empirical Evidence From the ARDL Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    17. M. C. Jones, 2015. "Rejoinder," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 83(2), pages 223-227, August.
    18. Travis Sharp, 2019. "Wars, presidents, and punctuated equilibriums in US defense spending," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(3), pages 367-396, September.
    19. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:8:y:2018:i:4:p:370-383 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Frank M. Magwegwe & Maurice M. MacDonald & HanNa Lim & Stuart J. Heckman, 2023. "Determinants of financial worry," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 171-221, January.
    21. A. Arriaza & A. Crescenzo & M. A. Sordo & A. Suárez-Llorens, 2019. "Shape measures based on the convex transform order," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 99-124, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:16:p:5657-:d:394989. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.