IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i2p439-d1320094.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Combined Non-Wood and Wood Spectra of Biomass Chips on Rapid Prediction of Ultimate Analysis Parameters Using near Infrared Spectroscopy

Author

Listed:
  • Bijendra Shrestha

    (Department of Agricultural Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand)

  • Jetsada Posom

    (Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)

  • Panmanas Sirisomboon

    (Department of Agricultural Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand)

  • Bim Prasad Shrestha

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel P.O. Box 6250, Nepal
    Department of BioEngineering, University of Washington, William H. Foege Building 3720, 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98195-5061, USA)

  • Axel Funke

    (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Catalysis Research and Technology, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany)

Abstract

The ultimate analysis parameters, including carbon (C), hydrogen (H), nitrogen (N), and oxygen (O) content in biomass, were rarely found to be predicted by non-destructive tests to date. In this research, we developed partial least squares regression (PLSR) models to predict the ultimate analysis parameters of chip biomass using near-infrared (NIR) raw spectra of non-wood and wood samples from fast-growing tree and agricultural residue and nine different traditional spectral preprocessing techniques. These techniques include first derivative (sd1), second derivative (sd2), constant offset, standard normal variate (SNV), multiplicative scatter correction (MSC), vector normalization, min-max normalization, mean centering, sd1 + vector normalization, and sd1 + MSC. Additionally, we employed a genetic algorithm (GA), successive projection algorithm (SPA), multi-preprocessing (MP) 5-range, and MP 3-range to develop a PLSR model for rapid prediction. A dataset consisting of 120 chip biomass samples was utilized for model development in which the samples were non-wood samples of 65–67% and wood samples of 33–35%, and the model performance was evaluated and compared. The selection of the optimum performing model was mainly based on criteria such as the coefficient of determination in the prediction set (R 2 P ), root mean square error of the prediction set (RMSEP), and the ratio of prediction to deviation (RPD). The optimal model for weight percentage (wt.%) of C was obtained using GA–PLSR, yielding R 2 P , RMSEP, and RPD values of 0.6954, 1.1252 wt.%, and 1.8, respectively. Similarly, for wt.% of O, the most effective model was obtained using the multi-preprocessing PLSR–5 range method with R 2 P of 0.7150, RMSEP of 1.3088 wt.%, and RPD of 1.9. For wt.% of N, the optimal model was obtained using the MP PLSR-3 range method, resulting in R 2 P , RMSEP, and RPD values of 0.6073, 0.1008 wt.%, and 1.6, respectively. However, wt.% of the H model provided R 2 P , RMSEP, and RPD values of 0.5162, 0.2322 wt.%, and 1.5, respectively. Notably, the limit of quantification (LOQ) values for C, H, and O were lower than the minimum reference values used during model development, indicating a high level of sensitivity. However, the LOQ for N exceeded the minimum reference value, implying the samples to be predicted by the model must be in the range of reference range in the calibration set. By scatter plot analysis, the effect of combined non-wood and wood spectra of biomass chips on rapid prediction of ultimate analysis parameters using NIR spectroscopy was investigated. To include different species in a model, the species have to be not only in the different values of the constituents to make a wider range for a robust model, but also must provide their trend line characteristics in the scatter plot, i.e., correlation coefficient (R), slope, and intercept (same slope and slope approached to 1, and intercept is same (no gap) and approached zero, high R approached to 1). The effect of the R, slope, and intercept to obtain the better-optimized model was studied. The results show that the different species affected the model performance of each parameter prediction in a different manner, and by scatter plot analysis, which of these species were affecting the model negatively and how the model could be improved was indicated. This is the first time the effect has been studied by the principle of a scatter plot.

Suggested Citation

  • Bijendra Shrestha & Jetsada Posom & Panmanas Sirisomboon & Bim Prasad Shrestha & Axel Funke, 2024. "Effect of Combined Non-Wood and Wood Spectra of Biomass Chips on Rapid Prediction of Ultimate Analysis Parameters Using near Infrared Spectroscopy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-22, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:439-:d:1320094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/2/439/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/2/439/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bijendra Shrestha & Jetsada Posom & Panmanas Sirisomboon & Bim Prasad Shrestha, 2023. "Comprehensive Assessment of Biomass Properties for Energy Usage Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Spectral Multi-Preprocessing Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Sirisomboon, Panmanas & Funke, Axel & Posom, Jetsada, 2020. "Improvement of proximate data and calorific value assessment of bamboo through near infrared wood chips acquisition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1921-1931.
    3. Kissinger, Meidad & Fix, Jennifer & Rees, William E., 2007. "Wood and non-wood pulp production: Comparative ecological footprinting on the Canadian prairies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(3-4), pages 552-558, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bijendra Shrestha & Jetsada Posom & Panmanas Sirisomboon & Bim Prasad Shrestha & Pimpen Pornchaloempong & Axel Funke, 2024. "NIR Spectroscopy as an Alternative to Thermogravimetric Analyzer for Biomass Proximate Analysis: Comparison of Chip and Ground Biomass Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-27, February.
    2. Pitak, Lakkana & Sirisomboon, Panmanas & Saengprachatanarug, Khwantri & Wongpichet, Seree & Posom, Jetsada, 2021. "Rapid elemental composition measurement of commercial pellets using line-scan hyperspectral imaging analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    3. Hatem Abushammala & Muhammad Adil Masood & Salma Taqi Ghulam & Jia Mao, 2023. "On the Conversion of Paper Waste and Rejects into High-Value Materials and Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Debrupa Chakraborty & Joyashree Roy, 2015. "Ecological footprint of paperboard and paper production unit in India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 909-921, August.
    5. Kissinger, Meidad & Rees, William E., 2010. "An interregional ecological approach for modelling sustainability in a globalizing world—Reviewing existing approaches and emerging directions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(21), pages 2615-2623.
    6. White, Thomas J., 2007. "Sharing resources: The global distribution of the Ecological Footprint," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 402-410, December.
    7. Aleksandra Minajeva & Algirdas Jasinskas & Rolandas Domeika & Edvardas Vaiciukevičius & Egidijus Lemanas & Stanisław Bielski, 2021. "The Study of the Faba Bean Waste and Potato Peels Recycling for Pellet Production and Usage for Energy Conversion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Yue, Dongxia & Xu, Xiaofeng & Hui, Cang & Xiong, Youcai & Han, Xuemei & Ma, Jinhui, 2011. "Biocapacity supply and demand in Northwestern China: A spatial appraisal of sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 988-994, March.
    9. Thomas Wiedmann & John Barrett, 2010. "A Review of the Ecological Footprint Indicator—Perceptions and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(6), pages 1-49, June.
    10. Bijendra Shrestha & Jetsada Posom & Panmanas Sirisomboon & Bim Prasad Shrestha, 2023. "Comprehensive Assessment of Biomass Properties for Energy Usage Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Spectral Multi-Preprocessing Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-26, July.
    11. Decun Wu & Guangzhu Wu & He Yang, 2022. "Analysis of China’s Embodied Ecological Footprint and Its Flows among Economic Sectors per Unit of Currency Production," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    12. Meidad Kissinger & William Rees, 2010. "Exporting natural capital: the foreign eco-footprint on Costa Rica and implications for sustainability," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 547-560, August.
    13. Bousios, Spyridon & Worrell, Ernst, 2017. "Towards a Multiple Input-Multiple Output paper mill: Opportunities for alternative raw materials and sidestream valorisation in the paper and board industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 218-232.
    14. Destek, Mehmet & Sinha, Avik, 2020. "Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries," MPRA Paper 104246, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2020.
    15. Bijendra Shrestha & Jetsada Posom & Pimpen Pornchaloempong & Panmanas Sirisomboon & Bim Prasad Shrestha & Hidayah Ariffin, 2024. "Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Modeling of Combustion Characteristics in Chip and Ground Biomass from Fast-Growing Trees and Agricultural Residue," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-27, March.
    16. Jeong, So-Yeon & Lee, Eun-Ju & Ban, Se-Eun & Lee, Jae-Won, 2021. "Near infrared spectroscopy model for analyzing chemical composition of biomass subjected to Fenton oxidation and hydrothermal treatment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1341-1350.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:439-:d:1320094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.