IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i7p2988-d1106880.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accelerating Optimal Control Strategy Generation for HVAC Systems Using a Scenario Reduction Method: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Zhe Tian

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
    Tianjin Key Laboratory of Building Environment and Energy, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Chuang Ye

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Jie Zhu

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Jide Niu

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
    Tianjin Key Laboratory of Building Environment and Energy, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Yakai Lu

    (School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China)

Abstract

Learning an optimal control strategy from the optimized operating dataset is a feasible way to improve the operational efficiency of HVAC systems. The operation dataset is the key to ensuring the global optimality and universality of the operation strategy. Currently, the model-based method is commonly used to generate datasets that cover all operating scenarios throughout the cooling season. However, thousands of iterative optimizations of the model also lead to high computational costs. Therefore, this paper proposed a scenario reduction method in which similar operating scenarios were grouped into clusters to significantly reduce the number of optimization calculations. First, k-means clustering (with dry-bulb temperature, wet-bulb temperature, and cooling load as features) was used to select typical scenarios from operating scenarios for the entire cooling season. Second, the model-based optimization was performed with the typical scenarios to generate the optimal operating dataset. Taking a railway station in Beijing as a case study, the results show that the optimization time for the typical scenarios was only 1.4 days, which was reduced by 93.1% compared with the 20.6 days required to optimize the complete cooling season scenario. The optimal control rules were extracted, respectively, from the above datasets generated under the two schemes, and the results show that the deviation of energy saving rate was only 0.45%. This study shows that the scenario reduction method can significantly speed up the generation of the optimal control strategy dataset while ensuring the energy-saving effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhe Tian & Chuang Ye & Jie Zhu & Jide Niu & Yakai Lu, 2023. "Accelerating Optimal Control Strategy Generation for HVAC Systems Using a Scenario Reduction Method: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:7:p:2988-:d:1106880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/7/2988/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/7/2988/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gianluca Serale & Massimo Fiorentini & Alfonso Capozzoli & Daniele Bernardini & Alberto Bemporad, 2018. "Model Predictive Control (MPC) for Enhancing Building and HVAC System Energy Efficiency: Problem Formulation, Applications and Opportunities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-35, March.
    2. Kusiak, Andrew & Xu, Guanglin, 2012. "Modeling and optimization of HVAC systems using a dynamic neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 241-250.
    3. Drgoňa, Ján & Picard, Damien & Kvasnica, Michal & Helsen, Lieve, 2018. "Approximate model predictive building control via machine learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 199-216.
    4. Kusiak, Andrew & Li, Mingyang & Tang, Fan, 2010. "Modeling and optimization of HVAC energy consumption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(10), pages 3092-3102, October.
    5. Tang, Rui & Wang, Shengwei, 2019. "Model predictive control for thermal energy storage and thermal comfort optimization of building demand response in smart grids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 873-882.
    6. Campos, Gustavo & Liu, Yu & Schmidt, Devon & Yonkoski, Joseph & Colvin, Daniel & Trombly, David M. & El-Farra, Nael H. & Palazoglu, Ahmet, 2021. "Optimal real-time dispatching of chillers and thermal storage tank in a university campus central plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    7. Nguyen, Anh-Tuan & Reiter, Sigrid & Rigo, Philippe, 2014. "A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1043-1058.
    8. Zheng, Zhi-xin & Li, Jun-qing & Duan, Pei-yong, 2019. "Optimal chiller loading by improved artificial fish swarm algorithm for energy saving," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 227-243.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiale Tang & Kuixing Liu & Weijie You & Xinyu Zhang & Tuomi Zhang, 2023. "Research on Online Temperature Prediction Method for Office Building Interiors Based on Data Mining," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Hyang-A Park & Gilsung Byeon & Wanbin Son & Jongyul Kim & Sungshin Kim, 2023. "Data-Driven Modeling of HVAC Systems for Operation of Virtual Power Plants Using a Digital Twin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-14, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kathirgamanathan, Anjukan & De Rosa, Mattia & Mangina, Eleni & Finn, Donal P., 2021. "Data-driven predictive control for unlocking building energy flexibility: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Tian, Wei & Song, Jitian & Li, Zhanyong & de Wilde, Pieter, 2014. "Bootstrap techniques for sensitivity analysis and model selection in building thermal performance analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 320-328.
    3. Pinto, Giuseppe & Deltetto, Davide & Capozzoli, Alfonso, 2021. "Data-driven district energy management with surrogate models and deep reinforcement learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    4. Golmohamadi, Hessam & Larsen, Kim Guldstrand & Jensen, Peter Gjøl & Hasrat, Imran Riaz, 2022. "Integration of flexibility potentials of district heating systems into electricity markets: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    5. Lee, Zachary E. & Zhang, K. Max, 2021. "Generalized reinforcement learning for building control using Behavioral Cloning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    6. Karmellos, M. & Kiprakis, A. & Mavrotas, G., 2015. "A multi-objective approach for optimal prioritization of energy efficiency measures in buildings: Model, software and case studies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 131-150.
    7. Wang, Xinli & Cai, Wenjian & Yin, Xiaohong, 2017. "A global optimized operation strategy for energy savings in liquid desiccant air conditioning using self-adaptive differential evolutionary algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 410-423.
    8. Balvís, Eduardo & Sampedro, Óscar & Zaragoza, Sonia & Paredes, Angel & Michinel, Humberto, 2016. "A simple model for automatic analysis and diagnosis of environmental thermal comfort in energy efficient buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 60-70.
    9. Byung-Ki Jeon & Eui-Jong Kim & Younggy Shin & Kyoung-Ho Lee, 2018. "Learning-Based Predictive Building Energy Model Using Weather Forecasts for Optimal Control of Domestic Energy Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Savadkoohi, Marjan & Macarulla, Marcel & Casals, Miquel, 2023. "Facilitating the implementation of neural network-based predictive control to optimize building heating operation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    11. Zhan, Sicheng & Chong, Adrian, 2021. "Data requirements and performance evaluation of model predictive control in buildings: A modeling perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    12. Dong, Zhe & Huang, Xiaojin & Dong, Yujie & Zhang, Zuoyi, 2020. "Multilayer perception based reinforcement learning supervisory control of energy systems with application to a nuclear steam supply system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    13. Germán Ramos Ruiz & Eva Lucas Segarra & Carlos Fernández Bandera, 2018. "Model Predictive Control Optimization via Genetic Algorithm Using a Detailed Building Energy Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Edwards, Richard E. & New, Joshua & Parker, Lynne E. & Cui, Borui & Dong, Jin, 2017. "Constructing large scale surrogate models from big data and artificial intelligence," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 685-699.
    15. Yang, Shiyu & Wan, Man Pun & Ng, Bing Feng & Dubey, Swapnil & Henze, Gregor P. & Chen, Wanyu & Baskaran, Krishnamoorthy, 2020. "Experimental study of model predictive control for an air-conditioning system with dedicated outdoor air system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    16. Yang, Shiyu & Wan, Man Pun & Chen, Wanyu & Ng, Bing Feng & Dubey, Swapnil, 2021. "Experiment study of machine-learning-based approximate model predictive control for energy-efficient building control," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    17. Yang, Shiyu & Wan, Man Pun, 2022. "Machine-learning-based model predictive control with instantaneous linearization – A case study on an air-conditioning and mechanical ventilation system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    18. Giovanni Bianco & Stefano Bracco & Federico Delfino & Lorenzo Gambelli & Michela Robba & Mansueto Rossi, 2020. "A Building Energy Management System Based on an Equivalent Electric Circuit Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, April.
    19. Wang, Xinli & Cai, Wenjian & Lu, Jiangang & Sun, Youxian & Zhao, Lei, 2015. "Model-based optimization strategy of chiller driven liquid desiccant dehumidifier with genetic algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 939-948.
    20. Kim, Wonuk & Jeon, Yongseok & Kim, Yongchan, 2016. "Simulation-based optimization of an integrated daylighting and HVAC system using the design of experiments method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 666-674.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:7:p:2988-:d:1106880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.