IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i7p2985-d1106736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Financing Strategy of Green Energy-Efficient Supply Chain Based on Blockchain Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Di Wang

    (School of Accountancy, Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing 101149, China)

  • Daozhi Zhao

    (College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Fang Chen

    (College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

Abstract

With the development of ecological economics, energy-saving green energy chain management has been a wide concern of academia and industries. However, the relatively high cost of green investment makes manufacturers face the problem of financial constraints. On this basis, because the green level information of products is proprietary to manufacturers, manufacturers will lie about the green level of products in order to improve their profits out of the principle of profit maximization. As a result, banks cannot obtain the true green level of products, reducing the benefits of the green energy-efficient supply chain system and making the market of green products volatile. In view of this, blockchain technology is introduced in this paper to improve customer’s product green level sensitivity and obtain lower green credit interest rates from banks. In this paper, a green supply chain financing model based on blockchain technology was constructed under the condition of green information misreporting, and it is compared with the benchmark without blockchain technology. Research shows that the adoption of blockchain can achieve Pareto improvement of green supply chain members. In addition, manufacturers have an incentive to adopt blockchain if the cost of blockchain investment falls below a certain threshold, and consumer green sensitivity increases below that threshold. We compared the profits of green manufacturers with those of retailers and the total emissions of manufacturers. The results show that: (1) When the financing intensity exceeds a certain value, there is an optimal coverage of green financing to ensure that the profit target of manufacturers, the profit target of retailers and the emission reduction target are achieved simultaneously. (2) The adoption of blockchain can achieve Pareto improvement of green energy supply chain members. The actual data of green transformation of Jinyuan New Technology Company were cited. Through calculation, it was found that green transformation can reduce the emissions of enterprises. When the financing intensity is in a certain range, the profits of manufacturers and retailers can be maximized, and the emission reduction degree is the highest. Thus, the practicability and reliability of this model were proved. (3) Manufacturers have an incentive to adopt blockchain if the cost of blockchain investment falls below a certain threshold, and consumer green sensitivity increases below that threshold. The research results of this paper provide solutions for enterprises with limited funds for green transformation and provide a theoretical basis for the government to formulate emission reduction incentive mechanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Di Wang & Daozhi Zhao & Fang Chen, 2023. "Research on Financing Strategy of Green Energy-Efficient Supply Chain Based on Blockchain Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:7:p:2985-:d:1106736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/7/2985/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/7/2985/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhu, Wenge & He, Yuanjie, 2017. "Green product design in supply chains under competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 165-180.
    2. Bin Shen & Chen Zhu & Qingying Li & Xiaofeng Wang, 2021. "Green technology adoption in textiles and apparel supply chains with environmental taxes," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(14), pages 4157-4174, July.
    3. Hong, Zhaofu & Chu, Chengbin & Zhang, Linda L. & Yu, Yugang, 2017. "Optimizing an emission trading scheme for local governments: A Stackelberg game model and hybrid algorithm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 172-182.
    4. Ki, Hyoshin & Kim, Jeong-Yoo, 2022. "Sell green and buy green: A signaling theory of green products," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Yufeng Chen & Zhitao Zhu, 2022. "Liability Structure and Carbon Emissions Abatement: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(2), pages 481-507, October.
    6. Zabihollah Rezaee & Ling Tuo, 2019. "Are the Quantity and Quality of Sustainability Disclosures Associated with the Innate and Discretionary Earnings Quality?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 763-786, March.
    7. Hong, Zhaofu & Guo, Xiaolong, 2019. "Green product supply chain contracts considering environmental responsibilities," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 155-166.
    8. Asma Khatoon & Piyush Verma & Jo Southernwood & Beth Massey & Peter Corcoran, 2019. "Blockchain in Energy Efficiency: Potential Applications and Benefits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    9. Tsan‐Ming Choi & Subodha Kumar & Xiaohang Yue & Hau‐Ling Chan, 2022. "Disruptive Technologies and Operations Management in the Industry 4.0 Era and Beyond," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 9-31, January.
    10. Kouhizadeh, Mahtab & Saberi, Sara & Sarkis, Joseph, 2021. "Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    11. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-02-2016-2406 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Yu, Yugang & Zhou, Sijie & Shi, Ye, 2020. "Information sharing or not across the supply chain: The role of carbon emission reduction," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    13. Sajid Ullah & Naveed Ahmad & Farman Ullah Khan & Alina Badulescu & Daniel Badulescu, 2021. "Mapping Interactions among Green Innovations Barriers in Manufacturing Industry Using Hybrid Methodology: Insights from a Developing Country," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-25, July.
    14. Goss, Allen & Roberts, Gordon S., 2011. "The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1794-1810, July.
    15. Chen, Yufeng & Ni, Liangfu & Liu, Kelong, 2021. "Does China's new energy vehicle industry innovate efficiently? A three-stage dynamic network slacks-based measure approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    16. Benchekroun, Hassan & van Long, Ngo, 1998. "Efficiency inducing taxation for polluting oligopolists," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 325-342, November.
    17. Emilio Passetti & Lino Cinquini & Andrea Tenucci, 2018. "Implementing internal environmental management and voluntary environmental disclosure," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(4), pages 1145-1173, May.
    18. Sara de Sio & Alessandra Zamagni & Giulia Casu & Paola Gremigni, 2022. "Green Trust as a Mediator in the Relationship between Green Advertising Skepticism, Environmental Knowledge, and Intention to Buy Green Food," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Heydari, Jafar & Govindan, Kannan & Aslani, Amin, 2019. "Pricing and greening decisions in a three-tier dual channel supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 185-196.
    20. Runsen Yuan & Chunling Li & Nian Li & Muhammad Asif Khan & Xiaoran Sun & Nosherwan Khaliq, 2021. "Can Mixed-Ownership Reform Drive the Green Transformation of SOEs?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, May.
    21. Dash Wu, Desheng & Yang, Lipo & Olson, David L., 2019. "Green supply chain management under capital constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 3-10.
    22. Xing, Chao & Zhang, Yuming & Wang, Yuan, 2020. "Do Banks Value Green Management in China? The Perspective of the Green Credit Policy," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    23. Zhi-Ping Fan & Xue-Yan Wu & Bing-Bing Cao, 2022. "Considering the traceability awareness of consumers: should the supply chain adopt the blockchain technology?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(2), pages 837-860, February.
    24. Seyyed-Mahdi Hosseini-Motlagh & Samira Ebrahimi & Abbas Jokar, 2021. "Sustainable supply chain coordination under competition and green effort scheme," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(2), pages 304-319, February.
    25. Hubert Pun & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan & Pengwen Hou, 2021. "Blockchain Adoption for Combating Deceptive Counterfeits," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(4), pages 864-882, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Qingying & Ma, Manqiong & Shi, Tianqin & Zhu, Chen, 2022. "Green investment in a sustainable supply chain: The role of blockchain and fairness," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Lai, Zhixuan & Lou, Gaoxiang & Ma, Haicheng & Chung, Sai-Ho & Wen, Xin & Fan, Tijun, 2022. "Optimal green supply chain financing strategy: Internal collaborative financing and external investments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    3. Liu, Samuel Shuai & Hua, Guowei & Ma, Benedict Jun & Cheng, T.C.E., 2023. "Competition between green and non-green products in the blockchain era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    4. Li, Jin & Hu, Zening & Shi, Victor & Wang, Qian, 2021. "Manufacturer's encroachment strategy with substitutable green products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    5. Xing, Chao & Zhang, Yuming & Tripe, David, 2021. "Green credit policy and corporate access to bank loans in China: The role of environmental disclosure and green innovation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    6. Jiarui Fan & Yuning Zhou, 2023. "Empirical Analysis of Financing Efficiency and Constraints Effects on the Green Innovation of Green Supply Chain Enterprises: A Case Study of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Shengliang Zong & Chunyang Shen & Siping Su, 2022. "Decision Making in Green Supply Chain with Manufacturers’ Misreporting Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Kelei Xue & Guohua Sun, 2022. "Impacts of Supply Chain Competition on Firms’ Carbon Emission Reduction and Social Welfare under Cap-and-Trade Regulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-25, March.
    9. Cai, Jianhu & Sun, Haining & Shang, Jennifer & Hegde, Gajanan G., 2023. "Information structure selection in a green supply chain: Impacts of wholesale price and greenness level," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 34-46.
    10. Tianjian Yang & Chunmei Li & Xiongping Yue & Beibei Zhang, 2022. "Decisions for Blockchain Adoption and Information Sharing in a Low Carbon Supply Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Zongyu Mu & Yuangang Zheng & Hao Sun, 2021. "Cooperative Green Technology Innovation of an E-Commerce Sales Channel in a Two-Stage Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-28, July.
    12. Xiaoli Zhang & Guoyi Xiu & Fakhar Shahzad & Yupeng Duan, 2021. "Optimal Financing Strategy in a Capital-Constrained Supply Chain with Retailer Green Marketing Efforts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Cao, Yu & Yi, Chaoqun & Wan, Guangyu & Hu, Hanli & Li, Qingsong & Wang, Shouyang, 2022. "An analysis on the role of blockchain-based platforms in agricultural supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    14. Huang, Shuai & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Wang, Ningning, 2020. "Green subsidy modes and pricing strategy in a capital-constrained supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    15. Zhou, Yu & Yan, Shuangqi & Li, Gendao & Xiong, Yu & Lin, Zhibin, 2023. "The impact of consumer skepticism on blockchain-enabled sustainability disclosure in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    16. Chenbo Zhu & Juntian Yue & Jing Chen, 2022. "Green Product Development and Order Strategies for Retailers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    17. Wang, Moran & Guo, Xiaolong & Wang, Shouyang, 2022. "Financial hedging in two-stage sustainable commodity supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 803-818.
    18. Xu, Xiaoping & He, Ping & Zhou, Li & Cheng, T.C.E., 2023. "Coordination of a platform-based supply chain in the marketplace or reselling mode considering cross-channel effect and blockchain technology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 170-187.
    19. Ji, Jingna & Li, Tao & Yang, Lei, 2023. "Pricing and carbon reduction strategies for vertically differentiated firms under Cap-and-Trade regulation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    20. Yumin Fu & Jianyun Wu & Cheng Ma & Xiaoyu Fu, 2023. "Agency, Reselling, or Hybrid: Strategic Channel Selection in a Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:7:p:2985-:d:1106736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.