IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i6p2888-d1103012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extensive Experimental Characterization with Kinetic Data for the Gasification Simulation of Solid Biofuels

Author

Listed:
  • Maximilian Robert Heinrich

    (Institute for Water and Energy Management, University of Applied Sciences Hof, 95028 Hof, Germany)

  • André Herrmann

    (DBFZ Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum Gemeinnützige GmbH, 04347 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Andy Gradel

    (Institute for Water and Energy Management, University of Applied Sciences Hof, 95028 Hof, Germany)

  • Marco Klemm

    (DBFZ Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum Gemeinnützige GmbH, 04347 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Tobias Plessing

    (Institute for Water and Energy Management, University of Applied Sciences Hof, 95028 Hof, Germany)

Abstract

In this study, biomass–specific gasification data is experimentally collected for numerical simulations of fixed–bed reactors. Since biomass properties vary, it is crucial to have characteristic biomass data. Extensive data is collected to determine an appropriate description of specific biomass behavior, including basic data (e.g., heating value, size, densities, ultimate and total analysis etc.), biomass pyrolysis and heterogeneous gasification reaction data. Heterogeneous reactions were comparatively investigated in the forms of powder, particles, and a fixed–bed. The powder was investigated in depth with CO 2 , O 2 , and H 2 O (gas fraction 5–20 vol.%; temperature CO 2 , O 2 and H 2 O, respectively, at 730–790 °C, 360–405 °C, 720–780 °C), while particle reactions and fixed–bed reaction were only studied with CO 2 . A model description for a fixed–bed batch reactor was applied, modified, and compared to experimental fixed–bed batch reactor results. This study concludes that determining the appropriate characteristic particle size and parameters for the porous structure of specific biomass char is essential for simulation based on preliminary biomass characterization. Therefore, in future investigations, the description for biomass-specific differences between powder, single particles, and bulk of biomass char may be of greater focus, also taking into consideration O 2 and H 2 O.

Suggested Citation

  • Maximilian Robert Heinrich & André Herrmann & Andy Gradel & Marco Klemm & Tobias Plessing, 2023. "Extensive Experimental Characterization with Kinetic Data for the Gasification Simulation of Solid Biofuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-31, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:6:p:2888-:d:1103012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/6/2888/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/6/2888/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Trubetskaya, 2022. "Reactivity Effects of Inorganic Content in Biomass Gasification: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-36, April.
    2. Irfan, Muhammad F. & Usman, Muhammad R. & Kusakabe, K., 2011. "Coal gasification in CO2 atmosphere and its kinetics since 1948: A brief review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 12-40.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Sung-Wook & Park, Jong-Soo & Lee, Chun-Boo & Lee, Dong-Wook & Kim, Hakjoo & Ra, Ho Won & Kim, Sung-Hyun & Ryi, Shin-Kun, 2014. "H2 recovery and CO2 capture after water–gas shift reactor using synthesis gas from coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 635-642.
    2. Ján Kačur & Marek Laciak & Milan Durdán & Patrik Flegner, 2023. "Investigation of Underground Coal Gasification in Laboratory Conditions: A Review of Recent Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-55, August.
    3. Im-orb, Karittha & Simasatitkul, Lida & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2016. "Techno-economic analysis of the biomass gasification and Fischer–Tropsch integrated process with off-gas recirculation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 483-496.
    4. Duan, Zhengxiao & Zhang, Yanni & Deng, Jun & Shu, Pan & Yao, Di, 2023. "A systematic exploration of mapping knowledge domains for free radical research related to coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    5. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    6. Prabowo, Bayu & Aziz, Muhammad & Umeki, Kentaro & Susanto, Herri & Yan, Mi & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2015. "CO2-recycling biomass gasification system for highly efficient and carbon-negative power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 97-106.
    7. Zhao, Jingyu & Deng, Jun & Wang, Tao & Song, Jiajia & Zhang, Yanni & Shu, Chi-Min & Zeng, Qiang, 2019. "Assessing the effectiveness of a high-temperature-programmed experimental system for simulating the spontaneous combustion properties of bituminous coal through thermokinetic analysis of four oxidatio," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 587-596.
    8. Samuel C. Bayham & Andrew Tong & Mandar Kathe & Liang-Shih Fan, 2016. "Chemical looping technology for energy and chemical production," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 216-241, March.
    9. Sirui Tong & Bin Miao & Lan Zhang & Siew Hwa Chan, 2022. "Decarbonizing Natural Gas: A Review of Catalytic Decomposition and Carbon Formation Mechanisms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-30, April.
    10. Ziębik, Andrzej & Malik, Tomasz & Liszka, Marcin, 2015. "Thermodynamic evaluation of CHP (combined heat and power) plants integrated with installations of coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P2), pages 179-188.
    11. Zhang, Huining & Dong, Jianping & Wei, Chao & Cao, Caifang & Zhang, Zuotai, 2022. "Future trend of terminal energy conservation in steelmaking plant: Integration of molten slag heat recovery-combustible gas preparation from waste plastics and CO2 emission reduction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    12. Yao, Xiwen & Liu, Qinghua & Kang, Zijian & An, Zhixing & Zhou, Haodong & Xu, Kaili, 2023. "Quantitative study on thermal conversion behaviours and gas emission properties of biomass in nitrogen and in CO2/N2 mixtures by TGA/DTG and a fixed-bed tube furnace," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    13. Hong, Yong C. & Lee, Sang J. & Shin, Dong H. & Kim, Ye J. & Lee, Bong J. & Cho, Seong Y. & Chang, Han S., 2012. "Syngas production from gasification of brown coal in a microwave torch plasma," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 36-40.
    14. Janusz Zdeb & Natalia Howaniec & Adam Smoliński, 2019. "Utilization of Carbon Dioxide in Coal Gasification—An Experimental Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, January.
    15. Barbara Bielowicz & Jacek Misiak, 2020. "The Impact of Coal’s Petrographic Composition on Its Suitability for the Gasification Process: The Example of Polish Deposits," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Krzysztof M. Czajka, 2021. "Gasification of Coal by CO 2 : The Impact of the Heat Transfer Limitation on the Progress, Reaction Rate and Kinetics of the Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, September.
    17. Diedhiou, Ansoumane & Ndiaye, Lat-Grand & Bensakhria, Ammar & Sock, Oumar, 2019. "Thermochemical conversion of cashew nut shells, palm nut shells and peanut shells char with CO2 and/or steam to aliment a clay brick firing unit," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 581-590.
    18. Zhang, Fan & Xu, Deping & Wang, Yonggang & Argyle, Morris D. & Fan, Maohong, 2015. "CO2 gasification of Powder River Basin coal catalyzed by a cost-effective and environmentally friendly iron catalyst," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 295-305.
    19. Inayat, Muddasser & Sulaiman, Shaharin A. & Kurnia, Jundika Candra & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2019. "Effect of various blended fuels on syngas quality and performance in catalytic co-gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 252-267.
    20. Kim, Hakduck & Choi, Jeongmin & Lim, Heechang & Song, Juhun, 2021. "Enhanced combustion processes of liquid carbon dioxide (LCO2)–low rank coal slurry at high pressures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:6:p:2888-:d:1103012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.