IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i5p2425-d1086744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving the Efficiency of Renewable Energy Assets by Optimizing the Matching of Supply and Demand Using a Smart Battery Scheduling Algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe de Bekker

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science (EEMCS), Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Sho Cremers

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science (EEMCS), Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands
    CWI, National Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Sonam Norbu

    (Energy and Sustainability Group, James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK)

  • David Flynn

    (Energy and Sustainability Group, James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK)

  • Valentin Robu

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science (EEMCS), Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands
    CWI, National Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Given the fundamental role of renewable energy assets in achieving global temperature control targets, new energy management methods are required to efficiently match intermittent renewable generation and demand. Based on analysing various designed cases, this paper explores a number of heuristics for a smart battery scheduling algorithm that efficiently matches available power supply and demand. The core of improvement of the proposed smart battery scheduling algorithm is exploiting future knowledge, which can be realized by current state-of-the-art forecasting techniques, to effectively store and trade energy. The performance of the developed heuristic battery scheduling algorithm using forecast data of demands, generation, and energy prices is compared to a heuristic baseline algorithm, where decisions are made solely on the current state of the battery, demand, and generation. The battery scheduling algorithms are tested using real data from two large-scale smart energy trials in the UK, in addition to various types and levels of simulated uncertainty in forecasts. The results show that when using a battery to store generated energy, on average, the newly proposed algorithm outperforms the baseline algorithm, obtaining up to 20–60% more profit for the prosumer from their energy assets, in cases where the battery is optimally sized and high-quality forecasts are available. Crucially, the proposed algorithm generates greater profit than the baseline method even with large uncertainty on the forecast, showing the robustness of the proposed solution. On average, only 2–12% of profit is lost on generation and demand uncertainty compared to perfect forecasts. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed algorithm increases as the uncertainty decreases, showing great promise for the algorithm as the quality of forecasting keeps improving.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe de Bekker & Sho Cremers & Sonam Norbu & David Flynn & Valentin Robu, 2023. "Improving the Efficiency of Renewable Energy Assets by Optimizing the Matching of Supply and Demand Using a Smart Battery Scheduling Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-26, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2425-:d:1086744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2425/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2425/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ratnam, Elizabeth L. & Weller, Steven R. & Kellett, Christopher M., 2015. "An optimization-based approach to scheduling residential battery storage with solar PV: Assessing customer benefit," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 123-134.
    2. Hossain, Md Alamgir & Pota, Hemanshu Roy & Squartini, Stefano & Zaman, Forhad & Guerrero, Josep M., 2019. "Energy scheduling of community microgrid with battery cost using particle swarm optimisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    3. Norbu, Sonam & Couraud, Benoit & Robu, Valentin & Andoni, Merlinda & Flynn, David, 2021. "Modelling the redistribution of benefits from joint investments in community energy projects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    4. Zhang, Bingying & Li, Qiqiang & Wang, Luhao & Feng, Wei, 2018. "Robust optimization for energy transactions in multi-microgrids under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 346-360.
    5. Suárez-Cetrulo, Andrés L. & Burnham-King, Lauren & Haughton, David & Carbajo, Ricardo Simón, 2022. "Wind power forecasting using ensemble learning for day-ahead energy trading," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 685-698.
    6. Mr. Anil Ari & Mr. Nicolas Arregui & Mr. Simon Black & Oya Celasun & Ms. Dora M Iakova & Ms. Aiko Mineshima & Mr. Victor Mylonas & Ian W.H. Parry & Iulia Teodoru & Karlygash Zhunussova, 2022. "Surging Energy Prices in Europe in the Aftermath of the War: How to Support the Vulnerable and Speed up the Transition Away from Fossil Fuels," IMF Working Papers 2022/152, International Monetary Fund.
    7. Skittides, Christina & Früh, Wolf-Gerrit, 2014. "Wind forecasting using Principal Component Analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 365-374.
    8. Yoon, Yourim & Kim, Yong-Hyuk, 2016. "Effective scheduling of residential energy storage systems under dynamic pricing," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P2), pages 936-945.
    9. Ibrahim, H. & Ilinca, A. & Perron, J., 2008. "Energy storage systems--Characteristics and comparisons," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 1221-1250, June.
    10. Forbes, Kevin F. & Zampelli, Ernest M., 2020. "Accuracy of wind energy forecasts in Great Britain and prospects for improvement," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    11. Antonopoulos, Ioannis & Robu, Valentin & Couraud, Benoit & Kirli, Desen & Norbu, Sonam & Kiprakis, Aristides & Flynn, David & Elizondo-Gonzalez, Sergio & Wattam, Steve, 2020. "Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches to energy demand-side response: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    12. Anh-Duc Nguyen & Van-Hai Bui & Akhtar Hussain & Duc-Huy Nguyen & Hak-Man Kim, 2018. "Impact of Demand Response Programs on Optimal Operation of Multi-Microgrid System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    13. Mehdi Bagheri & Venera Nurmanova & Oveis Abedinia & Mohammad Salay Naderi & Noradin Ghadimi & Mehdi Salay Naderi, 2019. "Renewable Energy Sources and Battery Forecasting Effects in Smart Power System Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Grace Muriithi & Sunetra Chowdhury, 2021. "Optimal Energy Management of a Grid-Tied Solar PV-Battery Microgrid: A Reinforcement Learning Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiyoung Eum & Yongki Kim, 2020. "Analysis on Operation Modes of Residential BESS with Balcony-PV for Apartment Houses in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Martin, Nigel & Rice, John, 2021. "Power outages, climate events and renewable energy: Reviewing energy storage policy and regulatory options for Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    3. Couraud, Benoit & Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Norbu, Sonam & Chen, Si & Flynn, David, 2023. "Responsive FLEXibility: A smart local energy system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    4. Parra, David & Swierczynski, Maciej & Stroe, Daniel I. & Norman, Stuart.A. & Abdon, Andreas & Worlitschek, Jörg & O’Doherty, Travis & Rodrigues, Lucelia & Gillott, Mark & Zhang, Xiaojin & Bauer, Chris, 2017. "An interdisciplinary review of energy storage for communities: Challenges and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 730-749.
    5. Ana Cabrera-Tobar & Alessandro Massi Pavan & Giovanni Petrone & Giovanni Spagnuolo, 2022. "A Review of the Optimization and Control Techniques in the Presence of Uncertainties for the Energy Management of Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-38, December.
    6. Kirli, Desen & Couraud, Benoit & Robu, Valentin & Salgado-Bravo, Marcelo & Norbu, Sonam & Andoni, Merlinda & Antonopoulos, Ioannis & Negrete-Pincetic, Matias & Flynn, David & Kiprakis, Aristides, 2022. "Smart contracts in energy systems: A systematic review of fundamental approaches and implementations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Vanderlei Aparecido Silva & Alexandre Rasi Aoki & Germano Lambert-Torres, 2020. "Optimal Day-Ahead Scheduling of Microgrids with Battery Energy Storage System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-28, October.
    8. Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Lee, Inkyu & Moon, Il, 2022. "Liquid air as an emerging energy vector towards carbon neutrality: A multi-scale systems perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    9. Wang, Dongxiao & Qiu, Jing & Reedman, Luke & Meng, Ke & Lai, Loi Lei, 2018. "Two-stage energy management for networked microgrids with high renewable penetration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 39-48.
    10. Yuru Guan & Jin Yan & Yuli Shan & Yannan Zhou & Ye Hang & Ruoqi Li & Yu Liu & Binyuan Liu & Qingyun Nie & Benedikt Bruckner & Kuishuang Feng & Klaus Hubacek, 2023. "Burden of the global energy price crisis on households," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 8(3), pages 304-316, March.
    11. Shuang Rong & Weixing Li & Zhimin Li & Yong Sun & Taiyi Zheng, 2015. "Optimal Allocation of Thermal-Electric Decoupling Systems Based on the National Economy by an Improved Conjugate Gradient Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Zhou, Yuan & Wang, Jiangjiang & Dong, Fuxiang & Qin, Yanbo & Ma, Zherui & Ma, Yanpeng & Li, Jianqiang, 2021. "Novel flexibility evaluation of hybrid combined cooling, heating and power system with an improved operation strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    13. Katla, Daria & Bartela, Łukasz & Skorek-Osikowska, Anna, 2020. "Evaluation of electricity generation subsystem of power-to-gas-to-power unit using gas expander and heat recovery steam generator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    14. Anilkumar, T.T. & Simon, Sishaj P. & Padhy, Narayana Prasad, 2017. "Residential electricity cost minimization model through open well-pico turbine pumped storage system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 23-35.
    15. Díaz-González, Francisco & Sumper, Andreas & Gomis-Bellmunt, Oriol & Villafáfila-Robles, Roberto, 2012. "A review of energy storage technologies for wind power applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 2154-2171.
    16. Toledo, Olga Moraes & Oliveira Filho, Delly & Diniz, Antônia Sônia Alves Cardoso, 2010. "Distributed photovoltaic generation and energy storage systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 506-511, January.
    17. Rabiee, Abdorreza & Khorramdel, Hossein & Aghaei, Jamshid, 2013. "A review of energy storage systems in microgrids with wind turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 316-326.
    18. Davide Coraci & Silvio Brandi & Marco Savino Piscitelli & Alfonso Capozzoli, 2021. "Online Implementation of a Soft Actor-Critic Agent to Enhance Indoor Temperature Control and Energy Efficiency in Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, February.
    19. Vieira, Filomeno M. & Moura, Pedro S. & de Almeida, Aníbal T., 2017. "Energy storage system for self-consumption of photovoltaic energy in residential zero energy buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 308-320.
    20. Morgan, Eric & Manwell, James & McGowan, Jon, 2014. "Wind-powered ammonia fuel production for remote islands: A case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 51-61.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2425-:d:1086744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.