IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i22p7543-d1278660.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Credibility Theory-Based Information Gap Decision Theory to Improve Robustness of Electricity Trading under Uncertainties

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Zhao

    (Economic & Technology Research Institute, State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company, Jinan 250021, China)

  • Peng Wang

    (Economic & Technology Research Institute, State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company, Jinan 250021, China)

  • Qiushuang Li

    (Economic & Technology Research Institute, State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company, Jinan 250021, China)

  • Yan Li

    (Economic & Technology Research Institute, State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company, Jinan 250021, China)

  • Zhifan Liu

    (Economic & Technology Research Institute, State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company, Jinan 250021, China)

  • Liang Feng

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

  • Jiajia Chen

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

Abstract

In the backdrop of the ongoing reforms within the electricity market and the escalating integration of renewable energy sources, power service providers encounter substantial trading risks stemming from the inherent uncertainties surrounding market prices and load demands. This paper endeavors to address these challenges by proposing a credibility theory-based information gap decision theory (CTbIGDT) to improve robustness of electricity trading under uncertainties. To begin, we establish credibility theory as a foundational risk assessment methodology for uncertain price and load, incorporating both necessity and randomness measures. Subsequently, we advance the concept by developing the CTbIGDT optimization model, grounded in the consideration of expected costs, with the primary aim of fortifying the robustness of electricity trading practices. The ensuing model is then transformed into an equivalent form and solved using established standard optimization techniques. To validate the efficacy and robustness of our proposed methodology, a case study is conducted utilizing a modified IEEE 33-node distribution network system. The results of this study serve to underscore the viability and potency of the CTbIGDT model in enhancing the effectiveness of electricity trading strategies in an uncertain environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Zhao & Peng Wang & Qiushuang Li & Yan Li & Zhifan Liu & Liang Feng & Jiajia Chen, 2023. "Credibility Theory-Based Information Gap Decision Theory to Improve Robustness of Electricity Trading under Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7543-:d:1278660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7543/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7543/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Majidi, M. & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B. & Soroudi, A., 2019. "Application of information gap decision theory in practical energy problems: A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 157-165.
    2. Rai, Alan & Nunn, Oliver, 2020. "On the impact of increasing penetration of variable renewables on electricity spot price extremes in Australia," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 67-86.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mwampashi, Muthe Mathias & Nikitopoulos, Christina Sklibosios & Konstandatos, Otto & Rai, Alan, 2021. "Wind generation and the dynamics of electricity prices in Australia," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Ying-Yi Hong & Gerard Francesco DG. Apolinario, 2021. "Uncertainty in Unit Commitment in Power Systems: A Review of Models, Methods, and Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-47, October.
    3. Macedo, Daniela Pereira & Marques, António Cardoso & Damette, Olivier, 2022. "The role of electricity flows and renewable electricity production in the behaviour of electricity prices in Spain," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 885-900.
    4. Abbas Rabiee & Ali Abdali & Seyed Masoud Mohseni-Bonab & Mohsen Hazrati, 2021. "Risk-Averse Scheduling of Combined Heat and Power-Based Microgrids in Presence of Uncertain Distributed Energy Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Manuel S. Alvarez-Alvarado & Johnny Rengifo & Rommel M. Gallegos-Núñez & José G. Rivera-Mora & Holguer H. Noriega & Washington Velasquez & Daniel L. Donaldson & Carlos D. Rodríguez-Gallegos, 2022. "Particle Swarm Optimization for Optimal Frequency Response with High Penetration of Photovoltaic and Wind Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-12, November.
    6. Utama, Christian & Troitzsch, Sebastian & Thakur, Jagruti, 2021. "Demand-side flexibility and demand-side bidding for flexible loads in air-conditioned buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    7. Mirzaei, Mohammad Amin & Sadeghi-Yazdankhah, Ahmad & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam & Marzband, Mousa & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Catalão, João P.S., 2019. "Integration of emerging resources in IGDT-based robust scheduling of combined power and natural gas systems considering flexible ramping products," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    8. Mwampashi, Muthe Mathias & Nikitopoulos, Christina Sklibosios & Rai, Alan & Konstandatos, Otto, 2022. "Large-scale and rooftop solar generation in the NEM: A tale of two renewables strategies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    9. Tostado-Véliz, Marcos & Kamel, Salah & Aymen, Flah & Jurado, Francisco, 2022. "A novel hybrid lexicographic-IGDT methodology for robust multi-objective solution of home energy management systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    10. Yasir Alsaedi & Gurudeo Anand Tularam & Victor Wong, 2021. "Impact of the Nature of Energy Management and Responses to Policies Regarding Solar and Wind Pricing: A Qualitative Study of the Australian Electricity Markets," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(3), pages 191-205.
    11. Ju, Liwei & Yin, Zhe & Zhou, Qingqing & Li, Qiaochu & Wang, Peng & Tian, Wenxu & Li, Peng & Tan, Zhongfu, 2022. "Nearly-zero carbon optimal operation model and benefit allocation strategy for a novel virtual power plant using carbon capture, power-to-gas, and waste incineration power in rural areas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    12. Ana Cabrera-Tobar & Alessandro Massi Pavan & Giovanni Petrone & Giovanni Spagnuolo, 2022. "A Review of the Optimization and Control Techniques in the Presence of Uncertainties for the Energy Management of Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-38, December.
    13. Rangarajan, Arvind & Foley, Sean & Trück, Stefan, 2023. "Assessing the impact of battery storage on Australian electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    14. Lumin Shi & Man-Wen Tian & As’ad Alizadeh & Ardashir Mohammadzadeh & Sayyad Nojavan, 2023. "Information Gap Decision Theory-Based Risk-Averse Scheduling of a Combined Heat and Power Hybrid Energy System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Hongjie Tang & Shicheng Zhang & Jinhui Li & Lingwei Kong & Baoqiang Zhang & Fei Xing & Huageng Luo, 2023. "Imprecise P-Box Sensitivity Analysis of an Aero-Engine Combustor Performance Simulation Model Considering Correlated Variables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-22, March.
    16. Rahim, Sahar & Wang, Zhen & Ju, Ping, 2022. "Overview and applications of Robust optimization in the avant-garde energy grid infrastructure: A systematic review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    17. Savis Gohari Krangsås & Koen Steemers & Thaleia Konstantinou & Silvia Soutullo & Mingming Liu & Emanuela Giancola & Bahri Prebreza & Touraj Ashrafian & Lina Murauskaitė & Nienke Maas, 2021. "Positive Energy Districts: Identifying Challenges and Interdependencies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, September.
    18. Malek Al-Chalabi, 2023. "Targeted and Tangential Effects—A Novel Framework for Energy Research and Practitioners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-12, August.
    19. Javier L'opez Prol & Wolf-Peter Schill, 2020. "The Economics of Variable Renewables and Electricity Storage," Papers 2012.15371, arXiv.org.
    20. Macedo, Daniela Pereira & Marques, António Cardoso & Damette, Olivier, 2021. "The Merit-Order Effect on the Swedish bidding zone with the highest electricity flow in the Elspot market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7543-:d:1278660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.