IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i16p5915-d1214363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study of Global Sensitivity Analysis and Local Sensitivity Analysis in Power System Parameter Identification

Author

Listed:
  • Chuan Qin

    (College of Energy and Electrical Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Yuqing Jin

    (College of Energy and Electrical Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Meng Tian

    (State Grid Yancheng Power Supply Company, Yancheng 224008, China)

  • Ping Ju

    (College of Energy and Electrical Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Shun Zhou

    (State Grid Yancheng Power Supply Company, Yancheng 224008, China)

Abstract

In the process of parameter identification, sensitivity analysis is mainly used to determine key parameters with high sensitivity in the model. Sensitivity analysis methods include local sensitivity analysis (LSA) and global sensitivity analysis (GSA). The LSA method has been widely used for power system parameter identification for a long time, while the GSA has started to be used in recent years. However, there is no clear conclusion on the impact of different sensitivity analysis methods on parameter identification results. Therefore, this paper compares and studies the roles that LSA and GSA can play in different parameter identification methods, providing clear guidance for the selection of sensitivity analysis methods and parameter identification methods. The conclusion is as follows. If the identification strategy that only identifies key parameters with high sensitivity is adopted, we recommend still using the existing LSA method. If using a groupwise alternating identification strategy (GAIS) for high- and low-sensitivity parameters, either LSA or GSA can be used. To improve the identification accuracy, it is more important to improve the identification strategy than to change the sensitivity analysis method. When the accuracy of the non-key parameters with low sensitivity cannot be confirmed, using the GAIS is an effective method for ensuring identification accuracy. In addition, it should be noted that the high sensitivity of a parameter does not necessarily mean that the parameter is identifiable, which is revealed by the examples used in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuan Qin & Yuqing Jin & Meng Tian & Ping Ju & Shun Zhou, 2023. "Comparative Study of Global Sensitivity Analysis and Local Sensitivity Analysis in Power System Parameter Identification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:16:p:5915-:d:1214363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/16/5915/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/16/5915/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abbassi, Rabeh & Abbassi, Abdelkader & Jemli, Mohamed & Chebbi, Souad, 2018. "Identification of unknown parameters of solar cell models: A comprehensive overview of available approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 453-474.
    2. Wagener, Thorsten & Pianosi, Francesca, 2019. "What has Global Sensitivity Analysis ever done for us? A systematic review to support scientific advancement and to inform policy-making in earth system modelling," Earth Arxiv g9ma5, Center for Open Science.
    3. Jian Zhang & Mingjian Cui & Yigang He, 2020. "Parameters Identification of Equivalent Model of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator (PMSG) Wind Farm Based on Analysis of Trajectory Sensitivity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Carta, José A. & Díaz, Santiago & Castañeda, Alberto, 2020. "A global sensitivity analysis method applied to wind farm power output estimation models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    5. Soha Saad & Florence Ossart & Jean Bigeon & Etienne Sourdille & Harold Gance, 2021. "Global Sensitivity Analysis Applied to Train Traffic Rescheduling: A Comparative Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, October.
    6. Luo, Yan & Wang, Zhiyuan & Zhu, Jiamin & Lu, Tao & Xiao, Gang & Chu, Fengming & Wang, Ruixing, 2022. "Multi-objective robust optimization of a solar power tower plant under uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    7. Perz, Stephen G. & Muñoz-Carpena, Rafael & Kiker, Gregory & Holt, Robert D., 2013. "Evaluating ecological resilience with global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 263(C), pages 174-186.
    8. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 869-887.
    9. Mirko Ginocchi & Ferdinanda Ponci & Antonello Monti, 2021. "Sensitivity Analysis and Power Systems: Can We Bridge the Gap? A Review and a Guide to Getting Started," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-59, December.
    10. Zhang, Feng & Wang, Xinhe & Hou, Xinting & Han, Cheng & Wu, Mingying & Liu, Zhongbing, 2022. "Variance-based global sensitivity analysis of a hybrid thermoelectric generator fuzzy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    11. Thomas Guewouo & Lingai Luo & Dominique Tarlet & Mohand Tazerout, 2019. "Identification of Optimal Parameters for a Small-Scale Compressed-Air Energy Storage System Using Real Coded Genetic Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-32, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Rui & Li, Peng & Yu, Hao & Ji, Haoran & Xi, Wei & Wang, Chengshan, 2023. "Identification of critical uncertain factors of distribution networks with high penetration of photovoltaics and electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    2. Connor, Jeffery D. & Summers, David & Regan, Courtney & Abbott, Hayley & Van Der Linden, Leon & Frizenschaf, Jacqueline, 2022. "Sensitivity analysis in economic evaluation of payments for water and carbon ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    3. Mirko Ginocchi & Ferdinanda Ponci & Antonello Monti, 2021. "Sensitivity Analysis and Power Systems: Can We Bridge the Gap? A Review and a Guide to Getting Started," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-59, December.
    4. Vincenzo Varriale & Antonello Cammarano & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chains with Blockchain, IoT and RFID: A Simulation on Order Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    6. Xu Luo & Hong S. He & Yu Liang & Jacob S. Fraser & Jialin Li, 2018. "Mitigating the Effects of Climate Change through Harvesting and Planting in Boreal Forests of Northeastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Plischke, Elmar & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2019. "Copula theory and probabilistic sensitivity analysis: Is there a connection?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1046-1059.
    8. Wen Shi & Xi Chen & Jennifer Shang, 2019. "An Efficient Morris Method-Based Framework for Simulation Factor Screening," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 745-770, October.
    9. Shi, Nan & Lv, Yanling & Zhang, Yuchen & Zhu, Xianhui, 2023. "Linear fitting Rule of I–V characteristics of thin-film cells based on Bezier function," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    10. F. Wang & G. H. Huang & Y. Fan & Y. P. Li, 2020. "Robust Subsampling ANOVA Methods for Sensitivity Analysis of Water Resource and Environmental Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(10), pages 3199-3217, August.
    11. Liang, Yushi & Wu, Chunbing & Ji, Xiaodong & Zhang, Mulan & Li, Yiran & He, Jianjun & Qin, Zhiheng, 2022. "Estimation of the influences of spatiotemporal variations in air density on wind energy assessment in China based on deep neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    12. Daniel Harenberg & Stefano Marelli & Bruno Sudret & Viktor Winschel, 2019. "Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis for economic models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(1), pages 1-41, January.
    13. Tobias Fissler & Silvana M. Pesenti, 2022. "Sensitivity Measures Based on Scoring Functions," Papers 2203.00460, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    14. Shang, Xiaobing & Su, Li & Fang, Hai & Zeng, Bowen & Zhang, Zhi, 2023. "An efficient multi-fidelity Kriging surrogate model-based method for global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    15. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2016. "Capital depreciation and the underdetermination of rate of return: A unifying perspective," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 54-79.
    16. Lu, Xuefei & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2023. "Global sensitivity analysis in epidemiological modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 9-24.
    17. Matteo Fontana & Massimo Tavoni & Simone Vantini, 2020. "Global Sensitivity and Domain-Selective Testing for Functional-Valued Responses: An Application to Climate Economy Models," Papers 2006.13850, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    18. Stefano Cucurachi & Carlos Felipe Blanco & Bernhard Steubing & Reinout Heijungs, 2022. "Implementation of uncertainty analysis and moment‐independent global sensitivity analysis for full‐scale life cycle assessment models," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 374-391, April.
    19. Mehmet Yesilbudak, 2021. "Parameter Extraction of Photovoltaic Cells and Modules Using Grey Wolf Optimizer with Dimension Learning-Based Hunting Search Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-27, September.
    20. Yun, Wanying & Lu, Zhenzhou & Feng, Kaixuan & Li, Luyi, 2019. "An elaborate algorithm for analyzing the Borgonovo moment-independent sensitivity by replacing the probability density function estimation with the probability estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 99-108.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:16:p:5915-:d:1214363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.