IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i4p1390-d749298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L 0 and L 1 Guidance and Path-Following Control for Airborne Wind Energy Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel C. R. M. Fernandes

    (SYSTEC, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidade do Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal)

  • Sérgio Vinha

    (SYSTEC, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidade do Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal)

  • Luís Tiago Paiva

    (SYSTEC, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidade do Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal)

  • Fernando A. C. C. Fontes

    (SYSTEC, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidade do Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

For an efficient and reliable operation of an Airborne Wind Energy System, it is widely accepted that the kite should follow a pre-defined optimized path. In this article, we address the problem of designing a trajectory controller so that such path is closely followed. The path-following controllers investigated are based on a well-known nonlinear guidance logic termed L 1 and on a proposed modification of it, which we termed L 0. We have developed and implemented both L 0 and L 1 controllers for an AWES. The two controllers have an easy implementation with an explicit expression for the control law based on the cross-track error, on the heading angle relative to the path, and on a single parameter L ( L 0 or L 1 , depending on each controller) that we are able to tune. The L 0 controller has an even easier implementation since the explicit control law can be used without the need to switch controllers. Since the switching of controllers might jeopardize stability, the L 0 controller has an important theoretical advantage in being able to guarantee stability on a larger domain of attraction.The simulation study shows that both nonlinear guidance logic controllers exhibit appropriate performance when the L parameter is adequately tuned, with the L 0 controller showing a better performance when measured in terms of the average cross-track error.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel C. R. M. Fernandes & Sérgio Vinha & Luís Tiago Paiva & Fernando A. C. C. Fontes, 2022. "L 0 and L 1 Guidance and Path-Following Control for Airborne Wind Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:1390-:d:749298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/4/1390/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/4/1390/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luís Tiago Paiva & Fernando A. C. C. Fontes, 2018. "Optimal Control Algorithms with Adaptive Time-Mesh Refinement for Kite Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Ali Arshad Uppal & Manuel C. R. M. Fernandes & Sérgio Vinha & Fernando A. C. C. Fontes, 2021. "Cascade Control of the Ground Station Module of an Airborne Wind Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Cristina L. Archer & Ken Caldeira, 2009. "Global Assessment of High-Altitude Wind Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Bechtle, Philip & Schelbergen, Mark & Schmehl, Roland & Zillmann, Udo & Watson, Simon, 2019. "Airborne wind energy resource analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1103-1116.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali Arshad Uppal & Manuel C. R. M. Fernandes & Sérgio Vinha & Fernando A. C. C. Fontes, 2021. "Cascade Control of the Ground Station Module of an Airborne Wind Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Ali, Qazi Shahzad & Kim, Man-Hoe, 2021. "Design and performance analysis of an airborne wind turbine for high-altitude energy harvesting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    3. Helena Schmidt & Gerdien de Vries & Reint Jan Renes & Roland Schmehl, 2022. "The Social Acceptance of Airborne Wind Energy: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Lunney, E. & Ban, M. & Duic, N. & Foley, A., 2017. "A state-of-the-art review and feasibility analysis of high altitude wind power in Northern Ireland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 899-911.
    5. Sweder Reuchlin & Rishikesh Joshi & Roland Schmehl, 2023. "Sizing of Hybrid Power Systems for Off-Grid Applications Using Airborne Wind Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Mostafa A. Rushdi & Ahmad A. Rushdi & Tarek N. Dief & Amr M. Halawa & Shigeo Yoshida & Roland Schmehl, 2020. "Power Prediction of Airborne Wind Energy Systems Using Multivariate Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Malz, E.C. & Hedenus, F. & Göransson, L. & Verendel, V. & Gros, S., 2020. "Drag-mode airborne wind energy vs. wind turbines: An analysis of power production, variability and geography," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. Anny Key de Souza Mendonça & Caroline Rodrigues Vaz & Álvaro Guillermo Rojas Lezana & Cristiane Alves Anacleto & Edson Pacheco Paladini, 2017. "Comparing Patent and Scientific Literature in Airborne Wind Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-22, May.
    9. Malz, E.C. & Verendel, V. & Gros, S., 2020. "Computing the power profiles for an Airborne Wind Energy system based on large-scale wind data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 766-778.
    10. De Lellis, M. & Mendonça, A.K. & Saraiva, R. & Trofino, A. & Lezana, Á., 2016. "Electric power generation in wind farms with pumping kites: An economical analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 163-172.
    11. Rishikesh Joshi & Michiel Kruijff & Roland Schmehl, 2023. "Value-Driven System Design of Utility-Scale Airborne Wind Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Bórawski, Piotr & Bełdycka-Bórawska, Aneta & Jankowski, Krzysztof Jóżef & Dubis, Bogdan & Dunn, James W., 2020. "Development of wind energy market in the European Union," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 691-700.
    13. Fagiano, L. & Schnez, S., 2017. "On the take-off of airborne wind energy systems based on rigid wings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 473-488.
    14. Xinyu Long & Mingwei Sun & Minnan Piao & Zengqiang Chen, 2021. "Parameterized Trajectory Optimization and Tracking Control of High Altitude Parafoil Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Jelle A. W. Poland & Roland Schmehl, 2023. "Modelling Aero-Structural Deformation of Flexible Membrane Kites," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-24, July.
    16. Watson, Simon & Moro, Alberto & Reis, Vera & Baniotopoulos, Charalampos & Barth, Stephan & Bartoli, Gianni & Bauer, Florian & Boelman, Elisa & Bosse, Dennis & Cherubini, Antonello & Croce, Alessandro , 2019. "Future emerging technologies in the wind power sector: A European perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Shahzad Ali, Qazi & Kim, Man-Hoe, 2022. "Quantifying impacts of shell augmentation on power output of airborne wind energy system at elevated heights," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    18. Roystan Vijay Castelino & Pankaj Kumar & Yashwant Kashyap & Anabalagan Karthikeyan & Manjunatha Sharma K. & Debabrata Karmakar & Panagiotis Kosmopoulos, 2023. "Exploring the Potential of Kite-Based Wind Power Generation: An Emulation-Based Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, July.
    19. Bechtle, Philip & Schelbergen, Mark & Schmehl, Roland & Zillmann, Udo & Watson, Simon, 2019. "Airborne wind energy resource analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1103-1116.
    20. Mostafa A. Rushdi & Tarek N. Dief & Shigeo Yoshida & Roland Schmehl, 2020. "Towing Test Data Set of the Kyushu University Kite System," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:1390-:d:749298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.