IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i3p746-d729181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measure of Customer Satisfaction in the Residential Electricity Distribution Service Using Structural Equation Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Agenor S. Santos Neto

    (Studies and Researches in Science and Technology Group (GCITE), Federal Institute of Goias, Goiania 74605-010, Brazil
    Electrical, Mechanical & Computer Engineering School, Federal University of Goias, Goiania 74605-010, Brazil)

  • Marcio R. C. Reis

    (Studies and Researches in Science and Technology Group (GCITE), Federal Institute of Goias, Goiania 74605-010, Brazil
    Electrical, Mechanical & Computer Engineering School, Federal University of Goias, Goiania 74605-010, Brazil)

  • António Paulo Coimbra

    (Institute of Systems and Robotics (ISR), University of Coimbra, 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Julio C. V. Soares

    (Faculty of Science and Technology, Federal University of Goias, Goiania 74605-010, Brazil)

  • Wesley P. Calixto

    (Studies and Researches in Science and Technology Group (GCITE), Federal Institute of Goias, Goiania 74605-010, Brazil
    Electrical, Mechanical & Computer Engineering School, Federal University of Goias, Goiania 74605-010, Brazil)

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to apply structural equation modeling with partial least squares, and based on covariance, to assess the satisfaction of residential electricity consumers. The methodology used compares the results of both structural equation models to indicate the model that best fits the problem of measuring the satisfaction of residential consumers with electricity concessionaires and licensees. The sample used in the survey contained questionnaire responses from 86,175 individuals considering the period from 2014 to 2018. The constructs evaluated were satisfaction, quality, value, loyalty, and trust. A confidence interval analysis shows that all weights are significant, demonstrating the importance of all the indicators that represent the constructs. The trust, quality, and value constructs can explain 74.4% of the satisfaction construct variability, so this relationship’s explanatory capacity is considered substantial. Finally, the evaluation of the performance of the service provided by the electric energy concessionaires/licensees, measured by customer satisfaction, allows for the continuous improvement of services, and meeting, even if minimally, the expectations of its consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Agenor S. Santos Neto & Marcio R. C. Reis & António Paulo Coimbra & Julio C. V. Soares & Wesley P. Calixto, 2022. "Measure of Customer Satisfaction in the Residential Electricity Distribution Service Using Structural Equation Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-30, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:746-:d:729181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/746/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/746/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fumagalli, Elena & Garrone, Paola & Grilli, Luca, 2007. "Service quality in the electricity industry: The role of privatization and managerial behavior," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 6212-6224, December.
    2. Uzir, Md. Uzir Hossain & Al Halbusi, Hussam & Thurasamy, Ramayah & Thiam Hock, Rodney Lim & Aljaberi, Musheer A. & Hasan, Najmul & Hamid, Mahmud, 2021. "The effects of service quality, perceived value and trust in home delivery service personnel on customer satisfaction: Evidence from a developing country," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Pereira Jr., Amaro Olimpio & Soares, Jeferson Borghetti & de Oliveira, Ricardo Gorini & de Queiroz, Renato Pinto, 2008. "Energy in Brazil: Toward sustainable development?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 73-83, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuan, Peng & Pu, Yuran & Liu, Chang, 2021. "Improving electricity supply reliability in China: Cost and incentive regulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. Caroline Stiel, 2017. "Modern Public Enterprises: Organisational Innovation and Productivity," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1713, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Muller, Renan Bergonsi & Rego, Erik Eduardo, 2021. "Privatization of electricity distribution in Brazil: Long-term effects on service quality and financial indicators," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    4. Zhang, Yaqiong & Wang, Shifu, 2023. "The influence of anthropomorphic appearance of artificial intelligence products on consumer behavior and brand evaluation under different product types," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    5. Fenrick, Steve A. & Getachew, Lullit, 2012. "Cost and reliability comparisons of underground and overhead power lines," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 31-37.
    6. Silva, Wellington Costa & Castro, Maria Priscila Pessanha & Perez, Victor Haber & Machado, Francisco A. & Mota, Leonardo & Sthel, Marcelo Silva, 2016. "Thermal degradation of ethanolic biodiesel: Physicochemical and thermal properties evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1093-1099.
    7. Kumar, Avinash & Chakraborty, Shibashish & Bala, Pradip Kumar, 2023. "Text mining approach to explore determinants of grocery mobile app satisfaction using online customer reviews," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    8. Sarkar, Biswajit & Dey, Bikash Koli, 2023. "Is online-to-offline customer care support essential for consumer service?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    9. Barbosa, Ailson de Souza & Shayani, Rafael Amaral & Oliveira, Marco Aurélio Gonçalves de, 2018. "A multi-criteria decision analysis method for regulatory evaluation of electricity distribution service quality," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 38-48.
    10. Tahvanainen, Kaisa & Honkapuro, Samuli & Partanen, Jarmo & Viljainen, Satu, 2012. "Experiences of modern rate of return regulation in Finland," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 32-39.
    11. Yang, Xi & Zhao, Quanwu & Sun, Heshan, 2022. "Seekers’ complaint behavior in crowdsourcing: An uncertainty perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    12. Selim, Hassan & Eid, Riyad & Agag, Gomaa & Shehawy, Yasser Moustafa, 2022. "Cross-national differences in travelers’ continuance of knowledge sharing in online travel communities," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    13. Waseem Ahmad Khan & Zain Ul Abideen, 2023. "Effects of behavioural intention on usage behaviour of digital wallet: the mediating role of perceived risk and moderating role of perceived service quality and perceived trust," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Victor William Bwachele & Yee-Lee Chong & Gengeswari Krishnapillai, 2023. "Perceived service quality and student satisfaction in higher learning institutions in Tanzania," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Dastane, Omkar & Goi, Chai Lee & Rabbanee, Fazlul, 2023. "The development and validation of a scale to measure perceived value of mobile commerce (MVAL-SCALE)," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    16. Uzir, Md Uzir Hossain & Al Halbusi, Hussam & Lim, Rodney & Jerin, Ishraq & Abdul Hamid, Abu Bakar & Ramayah, Thurasamy & Haque, Ahasanul, 2021. "Applied Artificial Intelligence and user satisfaction: Smartwatch usage for healthcare in Bangladesh during COVID-19," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    17. Lu, Baozhou & Yan, Lixiao & Chen, Zhipeng, 2022. "Perceived values, platform attachment and repurchase intention in on-demand service platforms: A cognition-affection-conation perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    18. Minqin Yi & Ming Chen & Jilang Yang, 2024. "Understanding the self-perceived customer experience and repurchase intention in live streaming shopping: evidence from China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Petcharat, Thanatchaphan & Jattamart, Aungkana & Leelasantitham, Adisorn, 2023. "A conceptual model to imply a negative innovation assessment framework on consumer behaviors through the electronic business platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    20. Heechul Min, 2015. "Consumer benefits of reforming a state-dominated industry," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 58-77, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:746-:d:729181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.