IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i4p926-d496909.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Conventional and Variable Borehole Heat Exchangers for Use in a Desiccant Assisted Air Conditioning System

Author

Listed:
  • Finn Richter

    (Institute of Engineering Thermodynamics, Hamburg University of Technology, Denickestrasse 17, 21073 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Peter Niemann

    (Institute of Engineering Thermodynamics, Hamburg University of Technology, Denickestrasse 17, 21073 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Matthias Schuck

    (Institute of Geotechnical Engineering and Construction Management, Hamburg University of Technology, Harbuger Schlossstrasse 20, 21079 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Jürgen Grabe

    (Institute of Geotechnical Engineering and Construction Management, Hamburg University of Technology, Harbuger Schlossstrasse 20, 21079 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Gerhard Schmitz

    (Institute of Engineering Thermodynamics, Hamburg University of Technology, Denickestrasse 17, 21073 Hamburg, Germany)

Abstract

The objective of this work is to analyze a gas injection borehole heat exchanger coupled with a desiccant assisted air conditioning system during cooling and heating operation. A common problem that occurs in air conditioning systems is peak loads, during which the cooling or heating power of the soil can be exceeded. To counteract this drawback, a gas injection borehole heat exchanger, which is capable of creating artificial groundwater flow along the heat exchanger by inducing a pressure difference inside the well, is used. Experimental results of the performance differences between a conventional and a gas injection borehole heat exchanger are presented. Under the same inlet conditions, a reduction in the outlet temperature of up to 2 °C is achieved compared with an equivalent conventional borehole heat exchanger in cooling mode. The maximum cooling power is increased by 26%. As a result, a fast and dynamic responding control of the heat transfer between the heat exchanger and the soil is possible. During winter operation, despite the lower drilling depth of the gas injection borehole heat exchanger system, the performance is within the range of a conventional system. The power increase is limited to around 0.2 kW th at a steady state. In conclusion, gas injection borehole heat exchangers can be promising in terms of reliable peak load handling within large geothermal fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Finn Richter & Peter Niemann & Matthias Schuck & Jürgen Grabe & Gerhard Schmitz, 2021. "Comparison of Conventional and Variable Borehole Heat Exchangers for Use in a Desiccant Assisted Air Conditioning System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:926-:d:496909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/926/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/926/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Naicker, Selvaraj S. & Rees, Simon J., 2018. "Performance analysis of a large geothermal heating and cooling system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 429-442.
    2. Tomislav Kurevija & Adib Kalantar & Marija Macenić & Josipa Hranić, 2019. "Investigation of Steady-State Heat Extraction Rates for Different Borehole Heat Exchanger Configurations from the Aspect of Implementation of New TurboCollector™ Pipe System Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Speerforck, Arne & Schmitz, Gerhard, 2016. "Experimental investigation of a ground-coupled desiccant assisted air conditioning system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 575-585.
    4. Cui, Yuanlong & Zhu, Jie & Twaha, Ssennoga & Riffat, Saffa, 2018. "A comprehensive review on 2D and 3D models of vertical ground heat exchangers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 84-114.
    5. Eicker, Ursula & Vorschulze, Christoph, 2009. "Potential of geothermal heat exchangers for office building climatisation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 1126-1133.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adriana Greco & Edison Gundabattini & Darius Gnanaraj Solomon & Raja Singh Rassiah & Claudia Masselli, 2022. "A Review on Geothermal Renewable Energy Systems for Eco-Friendly Air-Conditioning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Speerforck, Arne & Ling, Jiazhen & Aute, Vikrant & Radermacher, Reinhard & Schmitz, Gerhard, 2017. "Modeling and simulation of a desiccant assisted solar and geothermal air conditioning system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2321-2336.
    2. Luka Boban & Dino Miše & Stjepan Herceg & Vladimir Soldo, 2021. "Application and Design Aspects of Ground Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-31, April.
    3. Tomasz Sliwa & Aneta Sapińska-Śliwa & Andrzej Gonet & Tomasz Kowalski & Anna Sojczyńska, 2021. "Geothermal Boreholes in Poland—Overview of the Current State of Knowledge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Gao, D.C. & Sun, Y.J. & Ma, Z. & Ren, H., 2021. "A review on integration and design of desiccant air-conditioning systems for overall performance improvements," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. Jani, D.B. & Mishra, Manish & Sahoo, P.K., 2017. "Application of artificial neural network for predicting performance of solid desiccant cooling systems – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 352-366.
    6. Tomasz Sliwa & Kinga Jarosz & Marc A. Rosen & Anna Sojczyńska & Aneta Sapińska-Śliwa & Andrzej Gonet & Karolina Fąfera & Tomasz Kowalski & Martyna Ciepielowska, 2020. "Influence of Rotation Speed and Air Pressure on the Down the Hole Drilling Velocity for Borehole Heat Exchanger Installation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Speerforck, Arne & Schmitz, Gerhard, 2016. "Experimental investigation of a ground-coupled desiccant assisted air conditioning system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 575-585.
    8. Gao, Jiajia & Li, Anbang & Xu, Xinhua & Gang, Wenjie & Yan, Tian, 2018. "Ground heat exchangers: Applications, technology integration and potentials for zero energy buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PA), pages 337-349.
    9. Shan, Kui & Wang, Shengwei, 2017. "Energy efficient design and control of cleanroom environment control systems in subtropical regions – A comparative analysis and on-site validation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 582-595.
    10. Alaie, Omid & Maddahian, Reza & Heidarinejad, Ghassem, 2021. "Investigation of thermal interaction between shallow boreholes in a GSHE using the FLS-STRCM model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1137-1150.
    11. Xu, Lingling & Pu, Liang & Angelo, Zarrella & Zhang, Derun & Dai, Minghao & Zhang, Shengqi, 2022. "An experimental investigation on performance of microencapsulated phase change material slurry in ground heat exchanger," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 296-305.
    12. Aizhao Zhou & Xianwen Huang & Wei Wang & Pengming Jiang & Xinwei Li, 2021. "Thermo-Hydraulic Performance of U-Tube Borehole Heat Exchanger with Different Cross-Sections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Riccardo Fraboni & Gianluca Grazieschi & Simon Pezzutto & Benjamin Mitterrutzner & Eric Wilczynski, 2023. "Environmental Assessment of Residential Space Heating and Cooling Technologies in Europe: A Review of 11 European Member States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, February.
    14. Paolo Maria Congedo & Caterina Lorusso & Maria Grazia De Giorgi & Riccardo Marti & Delia D’Agostino, 2016. "Horizontal Air-Ground Heat Exchanger Performance and Humidity Simulation by Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.
    15. Shamim, Jubair A. & Hsu, Wei-Lun & Paul, Soumyadeep & Yu, Lili & Daiguji, Hirofumi, 2021. "A review of solid desiccant dehumidifiers: Current status and near-term development goals in the context of net zero energy buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Liu, Zhijian & Li, Yuanwei & Xu, Wei & Yin, Hang & Gao, Jun & Jin, Guangya & Lun, Liyong & Jin, Guohui, 2019. "Performance and feasibility study of hybrid ground source heat pump system assisted with cooling tower for one office building based on one Shanghai case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 28-37.
    17. Peter Niemann & Finn Richter & Arne Speerforck & Gerhard Schmitz, 2019. "Desiccant-Assisted Air Conditioning System Relying on Solar and Geothermal Energy during Summer and Winter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Adriana Greco & Edison Gundabattini & Darius Gnanaraj Solomon & Raja Singh Rassiah & Claudia Masselli, 2022. "A Review on Geothermal Renewable Energy Systems for Eco-Friendly Air-Conditioning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Arghand, Taha & Javed, Saqib & Trüschel, Anders & Dalenbäck, Jan-Olof, 2021. "Cooling of office buildings in cold climates using direct ground-coupled active chilled beams," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 122-132.
    20. Yıldız, Ahmet & Ozgener, Onder & Ozgener, Leyla, 2012. "Energetic performance analysis of a solar photovoltaic cell (PV) assisted closed loop earth-to-air heat exchanger for solar greenhouse cooling: An experimental study for low energy architecture in Aeg," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 281-287.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:926-:d:496909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.