IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i2p470-d481925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Operation Scheduling Considering Cycle Aging of Battery Energy Storage Systems on Stochastic Unit Commitments in Microgrids

Author

Listed:
  • Yong-Rae Lee

    (Department of Energy System Engineering, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 006974, Korea)

  • Hyung-Joon Kim

    (Department of Energy System Engineering, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 006974, Korea)

  • Mun-Kyeom Kim

    (Department of Energy System Engineering, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 006974, Korea)

Abstract

As renewable penetration increases in microgrids (MGs), the use of battery energy storage systems (BESSs) has become indispensable for optimal MG operation. Although BESSs are advantageous for economic and stable MG operation, their life degradation should be considered for maximizing cost savings. This paper proposes an optimal BESS scheduling for MGs to solve the stochastic unit commitment problem, considering the uncertainties in renewables and load. Through the proposed BESS scheduling, the life degradation of BESSs is minimized, and MG operation becomes economically feasible. To address the aforementioned uncertainties, a scenario-based method was applied using Monte Carlo simulation and the K-means clustering algorithm for scenario generation and reduction, respectively. By implementing the rainflow-counting algorithm, the BESS charge/discharge state profile was obtained. To formulate the cycle aging stress function and examine the life cycle cost (LCC) of a BESS more realistically, the nonlinear cycle aging stress function was partially linearized. Benders decomposition was adopted for minimizing the BESS cycle aging, total operating cost, and LCC. To this end, the general problem was divided into a master problem and subproblems to consider uncertainties and optimize the BESS charging/discharging scheduling problem via parallel processing. To demonstrate the effectiveness and benefits of the proposed BESS optimal scheduling in MG operation, different case studies were analyzed. The simulation results confirmed the superiority and improved performance of the proposed scheduling.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong-Rae Lee & Hyung-Joon Kim & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2021. "Optimal Operation Scheduling Considering Cycle Aging of Battery Energy Storage Systems on Stochastic Unit Commitments in Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:470-:d:481925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/2/470/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/2/470/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yohwan Choi & Hongseok Kim, 2016. "Optimal Scheduling of Energy Storage System for Self-Sustainable Base Station Operation Considering Battery Wear-Out Cost," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Soshinskaya, Mariya & Crijns-Graus, Wina H.J. & Guerrero, Josep M. & Vasquez, Juan C., 2014. "Microgrids: Experiences, barriers and success factors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 659-672.
    3. Kim, H.Y. & Kim, M.K., 2017. "Optimal generation rescheduling for meshed AC/HIS grids with multi-terminal voltage source converter high voltage direct current and battery energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 309-321.
    4. Alvarado-Barrios, Lázaro & Rodríguez del Nozal, Álvaro & Boza Valerino, Juan & García Vera, Ignacio & Martínez-Ramos, Jose L., 2020. "Stochastic unit commitment in microgrids: Influence of the load forecasting error and the availability of energy storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2060-2069.
    5. Vatanpour, Mohsen & Sadeghi Yazdankhah, Ahmad, 2018. "The impact of energy storage modeling in coordination with wind farm and thermal units on security and reliability in a stochastic unit commitment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 476-490.
    6. Kyu-Hyung Jo & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2018. "Stochastic Unit Commitment Based on Multi-Scenario Tree Method Considering Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Uddin, Moslem & Romlie, M.F. & Abdullah, M.F. & Tan, ChiaKwang & Shafiullah, GM & Bakar, A.H.A., 2020. "A novel peak shaving algorithm for islanded microgrid using battery energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    8. Ho-Sung Ryu & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2020. "Two-Stage Optimal Microgrid Operation with a Risk-Based Hybrid Demand Response Program Considering Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.
    9. Rae-Kyun Kim & Mark B. Glick & Keith R. Olson & Yun-Su Kim, 2020. "MILP-PSO Combined Optimization Algorithm for an Islanded Microgrid Scheduling with Detailed Battery ESS Efficiency Model and Policy Considerations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yong-Rae Lee & Hyung-Joon Kim & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2022. "Correction: Lee et al. Optimal Operation Scheduling Considering Cycle Aging of Battery Energy Storage Systems on Stochastic Unit Commitments in Microgrids. Energies 2021, 14 , 470," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-2, March.
    2. Wonpoong Lee & Myeongseok Chae & Dongjun Won, 2022. "Optimal Scheduling of Energy Storage System Considering Life-Cycle Degradation Cost Using Reinforcement Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manzano, J.M. & Salvador, J.R. & Romaine, J.B. & Alvarado-Barrios, L., 2022. "Economic predictive control for isolated microgrids based on real world demand/renewable energy data and forecast errors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 647-658.
    2. Harsh, Pratik & Das, Debapriya, 2022. "Optimal coordination strategy of demand response and electric vehicle aggregators for the energy management of reconfigured grid-connected microgrid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. L. Alvarado-Barrios & A. Rodríguez del Nozal & A. Tapia & J. L. Martínez-Ramos & D. G. Reina, 2019. "An Evolutionary Computational Approach for the Problem of Unit Commitment and Economic Dispatch in Microgrids under Several Operation Modes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Hojin Kim & Jaewoo So & Hongseok Kim, 2022. "Carbon-Neutral Cellular Network Operation Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, June.
    5. Kim, Minsoo & Park, Taeseop & Jeong, Jaeik & Kim, Hongseok, 2023. "Stochastic optimization of home energy management system using clustered quantile scenario reduction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    6. Iolanda Saviuc & Herbert Peremans & Steven Van Passel & Kevin Milis, 2019. "Economic Performance of Using Batteries in European Residential Microgrids under the Net-Metering Scheme," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-28, January.
    7. Jungsub Sim & Minsoo Kim & Dongjoo Kim & Hongseok Kim, 2021. "Cloud Energy Storage System Operation with Capacity P2P Transaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Zhao, Bo & Chen, Jian & Zhang, Leiqi & Zhang, Xuesong & Qin, Ruwen & Lin, Xiangning, 2018. "Three representative island microgrids in the East China Sea: Key technologies and experiences," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 262-274.
    9. Avilés A., Camilo & Oliva H., Sebastian & Watts, David, 2019. "Single-dwelling and community renewable microgrids: Optimal sizing and energy management for new business models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    10. Luis Montero & Antonio Bello & Javier Reneses, 2022. "A Review on the Unit Commitment Problem: Approaches, Techniques, and Resolution Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-40, February.
    11. Bui, Duong Minh & Chen, Shi-Lin & Lien, Keng-Yu & Chang, Yung-Ruei & Lee, Yih-Der & Jiang, Jheng-Lun, 2017. "Investigation on transient behaviours of a uni-grounded low-voltage AC microgrid and evaluation on its available fault protection methods: Review and proposals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1417-1452.
    12. Kirchhoff, Hannes & Strunz, Kai, 2019. "Key drivers for successful development of peer-to-peer microgrids for swarm electrification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(C), pages 46-62.
    13. Angel L. Cedeño & Reinier López Ahuar & José Rojas & Gonzalo Carvajal & César Silva & Juan C. Agüero, 2022. "Model Predictive Control for Photovoltaic Plants with Non-Ideal Energy Storage Using Mixed Integer Linear Programming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, September.
    14. Quynh T.T Tran & Eleonora Riva Sanseverino & Gaetano Zizzo & Maria Luisa Di Silvestre & Tung Lam Nguyen & Quoc-Tuan Tran, 2020. "Real-Time Minimization Power Losses by Driven Primary Regulation in Islanded Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Ahmed M. Hussien & Jonghoon Kim & Abdulaziz Alkuhayli & Mohammed Alharbi & Hany M. Hasanien & Marcos Tostado-Véliz & Rania A. Turky & Francisco Jurado, 2022. "Adaptive PI Control Strategy for Optimal Microgrid Autonomous Operation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Konečná, Eva & Teng, Sin Yong & Máša, Vítězslav, 2020. "New insights into the potential of the gas microturbine in microgrids and industrial applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    17. Hirsch, Adam & Parag, Yael & Guerrero, Josep, 2018. "Microgrids: A review of technologies, key drivers, and outstanding issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 402-411.
    18. Thomas Sachs & Anna Gründler & Milos Rusic & Gilbert Fridgen, 2019. "Framing Microgrid Design from a Business and Information Systems Engineering Perspective," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(6), pages 729-744, December.
    19. Miguel Carpintero-Rentería & David Santos-Martín & Josep M. Guerrero, 2019. "Microgrids Literature Review through a Layers Structure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-22, November.
    20. Zhou, Yuekuan & Cao, Sunliang & Hensen, Jan L.M., 2021. "An energy paradigm transition framework from negative towards positive district energy sharing networks—Battery cycling aging, advanced battery management strategies, flexible vehicles-to-buildings in," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:470-:d:481925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.