IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i21p6885-d661025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Localized Temperature Difference on Hydrogen Fermentation

Author

Listed:
  • Seongwon Im

    (Department of Smart-City Engineering, Inha University, 100 Inharo, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea)

  • Mo-Kwon Lee

    (Department of Smart-City Engineering, Inha University, 100 Inharo, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea
    Department of Environmental Health, Daejeon Health Institute of Technology, 21 Chungjeong-ro, Dong-gu, Daejeon 34504, Korea)

  • Alsayed Mostafa

    (Department of Smart-City Engineering, Inha University, 100 Inharo, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea)

  • Om Prakash

    (Department of Smart-City Engineering, Inha University, 100 Inharo, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea)

  • Kyeong-Ho Lim

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kongju National University, Cheonan, Chungnam 31080, Korea)

  • Dong-Hoon Kim

    (Department of Smart-City Engineering, Inha University, 100 Inharo, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea)

Abstract

In a lab-scale bioreactor system, (20 L of effective volume in our study) controlling a constant temperature inside bioreactor with a total volume 25 L is a simple process, whereas it is a complicated process in the actual full-scale system. There might exist a localized temperature difference inside the reactor, affecting bioenergy yield. In the present work, the temperature at the middle layer of bioreactor was controlled at 35 °C, while the temperature at top and bottom of bioreactor was controlled at 35 ± 0.1, ±1.5, ±3.0, and ±5.0 °C. The H 2 yield of 1.50 mol H 2 /mol hexose added was achieved at ±0.1 and ±1.5 °C, while it dropped to 1.27 and 0.98 mol H 2 /mol hexose added at ±3.0 and ±5.0 °C, respectively, with an increased lactate production. Then, the reactor with automatic agitation speed control was operated. The agitation speed was 10 rpm (for 22 h) under small temperature difference (<±1.5 °C), while it increased to 100 rpm (for 2 h) when the temperature difference between top and bottom of reactor became larger than ±1.5 °C. Such an operation strategy helped to save 28% of energy requirement for agitation while producing a similar amount of H 2 . This work contributes to facilitating the upscaling of the dark fermentation process, where appropriate agitation speed can be controlled based on the temperature difference inside the reactor.

Suggested Citation

  • Seongwon Im & Mo-Kwon Lee & Alsayed Mostafa & Om Prakash & Kyeong-Ho Lim & Dong-Hoon Kim, 2021. "Effect of Localized Temperature Difference on Hydrogen Fermentation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:6885-:d:661025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/6885/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/6885/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weronika Cieciura-Włoch & Michał Binczarski & Jolanta Tomaszewska & Sebastian Borowski & Jarosław Domański & Piotr Dziugan & Izabela Witońska, 2019. "The Use of Acidic Hydrolysates after Furfural Production from Sugar Waste Biomass as a Fermentation Medium in the Biotechnological Production of Hydrogen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Karsten Kieckhäfer & Gunnar Quante & Christoph Müller & Thomas Stefan Spengler & Matthias Lossau & Wolfgang Jonas, 2018. "Simulation-Based Analysis of the Potential of Alternative Fuels towards Reducing CO 2 Emissions from Aviation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Wipa Prapinagsorn & Sureewan Sittijunda & Alissara Reungsang, 2017. "Co-Digestion of Napier Grass and Its Silage with Cow Dung for Methane Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Ghimire, Anish & Frunzo, Luigi & Pirozzi, Francesco & Trably, Eric & Escudie, Renaud & Lens, Piet N.L. & Esposito, Giovanni, 2015. "A review on dark fermentative biohydrogen production from organic biomass: Process parameters and use of by-products," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 73-95.
    5. Srirugsa, Tanawat & Prasertsan, Suteera & Theppaya, Thanansak & Leevijit, Theerayut & Prasertsan, Poonsuk, 2019. "Appropriate mixing speeds of Rushton turbine for biohydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent in a continuous stirred tank reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 823-830.
    6. Wong, Yee Meng & Wu, Ta Yeong & Juan, Joon Ching, 2014. "A review of sustainable hydrogen production using seed sludge via dark fermentation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 471-482.
    7. Andreas Lemmer & Hans-Joachim Naegele & Jana Sondermann, 2013. "How Efficient are Agitators in Biogas Digesters? Determination of the Efficiency of Submersible Motor Mixers and Incline Agitators by Measuring Nutrient Distribution in Full-Scale Agricultural Biogas ," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-19, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Guang & Wang, Jianlong, 2018. "Various additives for improving dark fermentative hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 130-146.
    2. Łukajtis, Rafał & Hołowacz, Iwona & Kucharska, Karolina & Glinka, Marta & Rybarczyk, Piotr & Przyjazny, Andrzej & Kamiński, Marian, 2018. "Hydrogen production from biomass using dark fermentation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 665-694.
    3. Sołowski, Gaweł & Shalaby, Marwa.S. & Abdallah, Heba & Shaban, Ahmed.M. & Cenian, Adam, 2018. "Production of hydrogen from biomass and its separation using membrane technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3152-3167.
    4. Elbeshbishy, Elsayed & Dhar, Bipro Ranjan & Nakhla, George & Lee, Hyung-Sool, 2017. "A critical review on inhibition of dark biohydrogen fermentation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 656-668.
    5. Lopez-Hidalgo, Angel M. & Alvarado-Cuevas, Zazil D. & De Leon-Rodriguez, Antonio, 2018. "Biohydrogen production from mixtures of agro-industrial wastes: Chemometric analysis, optimization and scaling up," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 32-41.
    6. Tian, Hailin & Li, Jie & Yan, Miao & Tong, Yen Wah & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Wang, Xiaonan, 2019. "Organic waste to biohydrogen: A critical review from technological development and environmental impact analysis perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    7. Sylwia Myszograj, 2019. "Biogas and Methane Potential of Pre-Thermally Disintegrated Bio-Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-12, October.
    8. Cieciura-Włoch, Weronika & Borowski, Sebastian & Otlewska, Anna, 2020. "Biohydrogen production from fruit and vegetable waste, sugar beet pulp and corn silage via dark fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1226-1237.
    9. Chen, Yi-di & Li, Suping & Ho, Shih-Hsin & Wang, Chengyu & Lin, Yen-Chang & Nagarajan, Dillirani & Chang, Jo-Shu & Ren, Nan-qi, 2018. "Integration of sludge digestion and microalgae cultivation for enhancing bioenergy and biorefinery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 76-90.
    10. Rajat Kumar Sharma & Mohammad Ali Nazari & Juma Haydary & Triveni Prasad Singh & Sandip Mandal, 2023. "A Review on Advanced Processes of Biohydrogen Generation from Lignocellulosic Biomass with Special Emphasis on Thermochemical Conversion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-27, September.
    11. Trchounian, Karen & Poladyan, Anna & Trchounian, Armen, 2016. "Optimizing strategy for Escherichia coli growth and hydrogen production during glycerol fermentation in batch culture: Effects of some heavy metal ions and their mixtures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 335-340.
    12. Zhang, Zexi & Ding, Ke & Ma, Xiaojun & Tang, Shuai & Wang, Zixin & Lu, Haifeng & Jiang, Weizhong & Si, Buchun, 2023. "Hydrodynamic design of down-flow packed bed reactor regulated the biohydrogen production and microbial enrichment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    13. Tran Thi Giang & Siriporn Lunprom & Qiang Liao & Alissara Reungsang & Apilak Salakkam, 2019. "Enhancing Hydrogen Production from Chlorella sp. Biomass by Pre-Hydrolysis with Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation (PSSF)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Vasmara, Ciro & Marchetti, Rosa & Carminati, Domenico, 2021. "Wastewater from the production of lactic acid bacteria as feedstock in anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    15. Vaez, Elhamossadat & Zilouei, Hamid, 2020. "Towards the development of biofuel production from paper mill effluent," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1408-1415.
    16. Carrillo-Reyes, Julián & Cortés-Carmona, Miguel Angel & Bárcenas-Ruiz, Christian Daniela & Razo-Flores, Elías, 2016. "Cell wash-out enrichment increases the stability and performance of biohydrogen producing packed-bed reactors and the community transition along the operation time," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 266-273.
    17. Ghimire, Anish & Frunzo, Luigi & Pirozzi, Francesco & Trably, Eric & Escudie, Renaud & Lens, Piet N.L. & Esposito, Giovanni, 2015. "A review on dark fermentative biohydrogen production from organic biomass: Process parameters and use of by-products," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 73-95.
    18. Chalima, Angelina & Hatzidaki, Angeliki & Karnaouri, Anthi & Topakas, Evangelos, 2019. "Integration of a dark fermentation effluent in a microalgal-based biorefinery for the production of high-added value omega-3 fatty acids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 130-138.
    19. Karolina Kucharska & Patrycja Makoś-Chełstowska & Edyta Słupek & Jacek Gębicki, 2021. "Management of Dark Fermentation Broth via Bio Refining and Photo Fermentation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.
    20. Karim, Ahasanul & Islam, M. Amirul & Mishra, Puranjan & Yousuf, Abu & Faizal, Che Ku Mohammad & Khan, Md. Maksudur Rahman, 2021. "Technical difficulties of mixed culture driven waste biomass-based biohydrogen production: Sustainability of current pretreatment techniques and future prospective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:6885-:d:661025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.