IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i16p4998-d614611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Assessment on Different Synthetic Routes of ZIF-8 Nanomaterials

Author

Listed:
  • Vasileios Ntouros

    (Group Building Environmental Research, Department of Physics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, University Campus, 157 84 Athens, Greece)

  • Ioannis Kousis

    (CIRIAF, Interuniversity Research Center, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 67, 06125 Perugia, Italy
    Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 97, 06125 Perugia, Italy)

  • Dimitra Papadaki

    (Group Building Environmental Research, Department of Physics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, University Campus, 157 84 Athens, Greece)

  • Anna Laura Pisello

    (CIRIAF, Interuniversity Research Center, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 67, 06125 Perugia, Italy
    Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 97, 06125 Perugia, Italy)

  • Margarita Niki Assimakopoulos

    (Group Building Environmental Research, Department of Physics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, University Campus, 157 84 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

In the last twenty years, research activity around the environmental applications of metal–organic frameworks has bloomed due to their CO 2 capture ability, tunable properties, porosity, and well-defined crystalline structure. Thus, hundreds of MOFs have been developed. However, the impact of their production on the environment has not been investigated as thoroughly as their potential applications. In this work, the environmental performance of various synthetic routes of MOF nanoparticles, in particular ZIF-8, is assessed through a life cycle assessment. For this purpose, five representative synthesis routes were considered, and synthesis data were obtained based on available literature. The synthesis included different solvents (de-ionized water, methanol, dimethylformamide) as well as different synthetic steps (i.e., hours of drying, stirring, precursor). The findings revealed that the main environmental weak points identified during production were: (a) the use of dimethylformamide (DMF) and methanol (MeOH) as substances impacting environmental sustainability, which accounted for more than 85% of the overall environmental impacts in those synthetic routes where they were utilized as solvents and as cleaning agents at the same time; (b) the electricity consumption, especially due to the Greek energy mix which is fossil-fuel dependent, and accounted for up to 13% of the overall environmental impacts in some synthetic routes. Nonetheless, for the optimization of the impacts provided by the energy use, suggestions are made based on the use of alternative, cleaner renewable energy sources, which (for the case of wind energy) will decrease the impacts by up to 2%.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasileios Ntouros & Ioannis Kousis & Dimitra Papadaki & Anna Laura Pisello & Margarita Niki Assimakopoulos, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment on Different Synthetic Routes of ZIF-8 Nanomaterials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:4998-:d:614611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/16/4998/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/16/4998/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bisi Olaniyan & Basudeb Saha, 2020. "Comparison of Catalytic Activity of ZIF-8 and Zr/ZIF-8 for Greener Synthesis of Chloromethyl Ethylene Carbonate by CO 2 Utilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Zerrin Günkaya & Alp Özdemir & Aysun Özkan & Müfide Banar, 2016. "Environmental Performance of Electricity Generation Based on Resources: A Life Cycle Assessment Case Study in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Arnall, Alexander & Parr, Douglass, 2005. "Moving the nanoscience and technology (NST) debate forwards: short-term impacts, long-term uncertainty and the social constitution," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 23-38.
    4. Lucy Ngatia & Johnny Grace III & Daniel Moriasi & Robert Taylor, 2019. "Nitrogen and Phosphorus Eutrophication in Marine Ecosystems," Chapters, in: Houma Bachari Fouzia (ed.), Monitoring of Marine Pollution, IntechOpen.
    5. Jan Najser & Petr Buryan & Sergej Skoblia & Jaroslav Frantik & Jan Kielar & Vaclav Peer, 2019. "Problems Related to Gasification of Biomass—Properties of Solid Pollutants in Raw Gas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Barbara Skowera & Zbigniew Zuśka & Alicja Baranowska, 2020. "Temporal Variability of Tropospheric Ozone Pollution in the Agricultural Region of Central-Eastern Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Renó, Maria Luiza Grillo & Lora, Electo Eduardo Silva & Palacio, José Carlos Escobar & Venturini, Osvaldo José & Buchgeister, Jens & Almazan, Oscar, 2011. "A LCA (life cycle assessment) of the methanol production from sugarcane bagasse," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3716-3726.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mattia Manni & Franco Cotana, 2022. "Life Cycle Thinking a Sustainable Built Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-2, May.
    2. Vasileios Ntouros & Ioannis Kousis & Anna Laura Pisello & Margarita Niki Assimakopoulos, 2022. "Binding Materials for MOF Monolith Shaping Processes: A Review towards Real Life Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Busola D. Akintayo & Oluwafemi E. Ige & Olubayo M. Babatunde & Oludolapo A. Olanrewaju, 2023. "Evaluation and Prioritization of Power-Generating Systems Using a Life Cycle Assessment and a Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Shafie, S.M. & Mahlia, T.M.I. & Masjuki, H.H., 2013. "Life cycle assessment of rice straw co-firing with coal power generation in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 284-294.
    3. Zhen, Xudong & Wang, Yang, 2013. "Study of ignition in a high compression ratio SI (spark ignition) methanol engine using LES (large eddy simulation) with detailed chemical kinetics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 549-558.
    4. Manju Dhakad Tanwar & Felipe Andrade Torres & Ali Mubarak Alqahtani & Pankaj Kumar Tanwar & Yashas Bhand & Omid Doustdar, 2023. "Promising Bioalcohols for Low-Emission Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Bisi Olaniyan & Basudeb Saha, 2020. "Multiobjective Optimization for the Greener Synthesis of Chloromethyl Ethylene Carbonate by CO 2 and Epichlorohydrin via Response Surface Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, February.
    6. Jiří Jaromír Klemeš & Petar Sabev Varbanov & Paweł Ocłoń & Hon Huin Chin, 2019. "Towards Efficient and Clean Process Integration: Utilisation of Renewable Resources and Energy-Saving Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-32, October.
    7. Poh Kam Wong & Yuen Ping Ho & Casey K. Chan, 2007. "Internationalization and evolution of application areas of an emerging technology: The case of nanotechnology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 70(3), pages 715-737, March.
    8. Francesco Asdrubali & Franco Cotana & Federico Rossi & Andrea Presciutti & Antonella Rotili & Claudia Guattari, 2015. "Life Cycle Assessment of New Oxy-Fuels from Biodiesel-Derived Glycerol," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Alizadeh, Sadegh & Avami, Akram, 2021. "Development of a framework for the sustainability evaluation of renewable and fossil fuel power plants using integrated LCA-emergy analysis: A case study in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1548-1564.
    10. Somorin, Tosin Onabanjo & Di Lorenzo, Giuseppina & Kolios, Athanasios J., 2017. "Life-cycle assessment of self-generated electricity in Nigeria and Jatropha biodiesel as an alternative power fuel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 966-979.
    11. Wiek, Arnim & Zemp, Stefan & Siegrist, Michael & Walter, Alexander I., 2007. "Sustainable governance of emerging technologies—Critical constellations in the agent network of nanotechnology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 388-406.
    12. Karunakaran Gowri Ahila & Balasubramani Ravindran & Vasanthy Muthunarayanan & Dinh Duc Nguyen & Xuan Cuong Nguyen & Soon Woong Chang & Van Khanh Nguyen & Chandran Thamaraiselvi, 2020. "Phytoremediation Potential of Freshwater Macrophytes for Treating Dye-Containing Wastewater," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Ji, Xi & Long, Xianling, 2016. "A review of the ecological and socioeconomic effects of biofuel and energy policy recommendations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 41-52.
    14. Sarkar, Susanjib & Kumar, Amit & Sultana, Arifa, 2011. "Biofuels and biochemicals production from forest biomass in Western Canada," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 6251-6262.
    15. Blanco Orozco, Napoleón Vicente & Zuniga Gonzalez, Carlos Alberto, 2013. "Environmental Bio Economic Impact in Nicaragua," MPRA Paper 49357, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 12 Jun 2013.
    16. Bowman, Diana M., 2007. "Patently obvious: Intellectual property rights and nanotechnology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 307-315.
    17. Kainthola, Jyoti & Kalamdhad, Ajay S. & Goud, Vaibhav V., 2020. "Optimization of process parameters for accelerated methane yield from anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and food waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1352-1359.
    18. Xiongchao Lin & Wenshuai Xi & Jinze Dai & Caihong Wang & Yonggang Wang, 2020. "Prediction of Slag Characteristics Based on Artificial Neural Network for Molten Gasification of Hazardous Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, October.
    19. Alexandre Bevilacqua Leoneti & Valquiria Aragão-Leoneti & Simone Vasconcelos Ribeiro Galina & Geciane Silveira Porto, 2017. "The methylic versus the ethylic route: considerations about the sustainability of Brazilian biodiesel production," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 637-651, April.
    20. Chen, Yingchao & Feng, Lianyong & Wang, Jianliang & Höök, Mikael, 2017. "Emergy-based energy return on investment method for evaluating energy exploitation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 540-549.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:4998-:d:614611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.