IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i6p1335-d332076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geological and Thermodynamic Analysis of Low Enthalpy Geothermal Resources to Electricity Generation Using ORC and Kalina Cycle Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Michał Kaczmarczyk

    (Department of Fossil Fuels, Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

  • Barbara Tomaszewska

    (Department of Fossil Fuels, Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

  • Leszek Pająk

    (Department of Fossil Fuels, Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

The article presents an assessment of the potential for using low enthalpy geothermal resources for electricity generation on the basis of the Małopolskie Voivodeship (southern Poland). Identification the locations providing the best prospects with the highest efficiency and possible gross power output. Thermodynamic calculations of power plants were based on data from several geothermal wells: the Bańska PGP-1, Bańska IG-1, Bańska PGP-3 and Chochołów PIG-1 which are working wells located in one of the best geothermal reservoirs in Poland. As the temperature of geothermal waters from the wells does not exceed 86 °C, considerations include the use of binary technologies—the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and Kalina Cycle. The potential gross capacity calculated for existing geothermal wells will not exceed 900 kW for ORC and 1.6 MW for Kalina Cycle. In the case of gross electricity, the total production will not exceed 3.3 GWh/year using the ORC, and will not exceed 6.3 GWh/year for the Kalina Cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Michał Kaczmarczyk & Barbara Tomaszewska & Leszek Pająk, 2020. "Geological and Thermodynamic Analysis of Low Enthalpy Geothermal Resources to Electricity Generation Using ORC and Kalina Cycle Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:6:p:1335-:d:332076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/6/1335/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/6/1335/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guzović, Zvonimir & Majcen, Boris & Cvetković, Svetislav, 2012. "Possibilities of electricity generation in the Republic of Croatia from medium-temperature geothermal sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 404-414.
    2. Michał Kaczmarczyk & Anna Sowiżdżał & Barbara Tomaszewska, 2020. "Energetic and Environmental Aspects of Individual Heat Generation for Sustainable Development at a Local Scale—A Case Study from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Buczkowski, Roman & Kujawski, Wojciech & Cichosz, Marcin & Piechota, Grzegorz, 2012. "Geoenergy in Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2545-2557.
    4. Yari, M. & Mehr, A.S. & Zare, V. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Rosen, M.A., 2015. "Exergoeconomic comparison of TLC (trilateral Rankine cycle), ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and Kalina cycle using a low grade heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 712-722.
    5. Bujakowski, Wiesław & Tomaszewska, Barbara & Miecznik, Maciej, 2016. "The Podhale geothermal reservoir simulation for long-term sustainable production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 420-430.
    6. Mehri Akbari & Seyed M. S. Mahmoudi & Mortaza Yari & Marc A. Rosen, 2014. "Energy and Exergy Analyses of a New Combined Cycle for Producing Electricity and Desalinated Water Using Geothermal Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-25, April.
    7. Yue, Chen & Han, Dong & Pu, Wenhao & He, Weifeng, 2015. "Thermal matching performance of a geothermal ORC system using zeotropic working fluids," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 746-754.
    8. Liu, Bo-Tau & Chien, Kuo-Hsiang & Wang, Chi-Chuan, 2004. "Effect of working fluids on organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 1207-1217.
    9. Chamorro, César R. & García-Cuesta, José L. & Mondéjar, María E. & Pérez-Madrazo, Alfonso, 2014. "Enhanced geothermal systems in Europe: An estimation and comparison of the technical and sustainable potentials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 250-263.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agnieszka Operacz & Bogusław Bielec & Barbara Tomaszewska & Michał Kaczmarczyk, 2020. "Physicochemical Composition Variability and Hydraulic Conditions in a Geothermal Borehole—The Latest Study in Podhale Basin, Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Agnieszka Operacz & Agnieszka Zachora-Buławska & Izabela Strzelecka & Mariusz Buda & Bogusław Bielec & Karolina Migdał & Tomasz Operacz, 2022. "The Standard Geothermal Plant as an Innovative Combined Renewable Energy Resources System: The Case from South Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Michał Kaczmarczyk & Barbara Tomaszewska & Agnieszka Operacz, 2020. "Sustainable Utilization of Low Enthalpy Geothermal Resources to Electricity Generation through a Cascade System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sadeghi, Mohsen & Nemati, Arash & ghavimi, Alireza & Yari, Mortaza, 2016. "Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of various ORC (organic Rankine cycle) configurations using zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 791-802.
    2. Cem Öksel & Ali Koç, 2022. "Modeling of a Combined Kalina and Organic Rankine Cycle System for Waste Heat Recovery from Biogas Engine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Akbari Kordlar, M., 2018. "A new flexible geothermal based cogeneration system producing power and refrigeration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 499-512.
    4. Michał Kaczmarczyk & Barbara Tomaszewska & Agnieszka Operacz, 2020. "Sustainable Utilization of Low Enthalpy Geothermal Resources to Electricity Generation through a Cascade System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Wang, Yongzhen & Li, Chengjun & Zhao, Jun & Wu, Boyuan & Du, Yanping & Zhang, Jing & Zhu, Yilin, 2021. "The above-ground strategies to approach the goal of geothermal power generation in China: State of art and future researches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    6. Magdalena Tyszer & Wiesław Bujakowski & Barbara Tomaszewska & Bogusław Bielec, 2020. "Geothermal Water Management Using the Example of the Polish Lowland (Poland)—Key Aspects Related to Co-Management of Drinking and Geothermal Water," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    7. Rašković, Predrag & Guzović, Zvonimir & Cvetković, Svetislav, 2013. "Performance analysis of electricity generation by the medium temperature geothermal resources: Velika Ciglena case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-31.
    8. Agnieszka Operacz & Bogusław Bielec & Barbara Tomaszewska & Michał Kaczmarczyk, 2020. "Physicochemical Composition Variability and Hydraulic Conditions in a Geothermal Borehole—The Latest Study in Podhale Basin, Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Liao, Gaoliang & E, Jiaqiang & Zhang, Feng & Chen, Jingwei & Leng, Erwei, 2020. "Advanced exergy analysis for Organic Rankine Cycle-based layout to recover waste heat of flue gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    10. Collings, Peter & Yu, Zhibin & Wang, Enhua, 2016. "A dynamic organic Rankine cycle using a zeotropic mixture as the working fluid with composition tuning to match changing ambient conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 581-591.
    11. Dominika Matuszewska & Marta Kuta & Piotr Olczak, 2020. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Mobilized Thermal Energy Storage System Using Geothermal Source in Polish Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, July.
    12. He, Chao & Liu, Chao & Zhou, Mengtong & Xie, Hui & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Wu, Shuangying & Li, Yourong, 2014. "A new selection principle of working fluids for subcritical organic Rankine cycle coupling with different heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 283-291.
    13. Li, Tailu & Zhu, Jialing & Hu, Kaiyong & Kang, Zhenhua & Zhang, Wei, 2014. "Implementation of PDORC (parallel double-evaporator organic Rankine cycle) to enhance power output in oilfield," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 680-687.
    14. Vélez, Fredy & Segovia, José J. & Martín, M. Carmen & Antolín, Gregorio & Chejne, Farid & Quijano, Ana, 2012. "A technical, economical and market review of organic Rankine cycles for the conversion of low-grade heat for power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 4175-4189.
    15. Piotr Gradziuk & Aleksandra Siudek & Anna M. Klepacka & Wojciech J. Florkowski & Anna Trocewicz & Iryna Skorokhod, 2022. "Heat Pump Installation in Public Buildings: Savings and Environmental Benefits in Underserved Rural Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-16, October.
    16. Anvari, Simin & Mahian, Omid & Taghavifar, Hadi & Wongwises, Somchai & Desideri, Umberto, 2020. "4E analysis of a modified multigeneration system designed for power, heating/cooling, and water desalination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    17. Zhao, Tingting & Jiang, Weitao & Niu, Dong & Liu, Hongzhong & Chen, Bangdao & Shi, Yongsheng & Yin, Lei & Lu, Bingheng, 2017. "Flexible pyroelectric device for scavenging thermal energy from chemical process and as self-powered temperature monitor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 754-760.
    18. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    19. Pili, Roberto & Romagnoli, Alessandro & Jiménez-Arreola, Manuel & Spliethoff, Hartmut & Wieland, Christoph, 2019. "Simulation of Organic Rankine Cycle – Quasi-steady state vs dynamic approach for optimal economic performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 619-640.
    20. Piotr Rusiniak & Katarzyna Wątor & Ewa Kmiecik, 2020. "Inorganic Chromium Speciation in Geothermal Water of the Podhale Trough (Southern Poland) Used for Recreational Purposes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:6:p:1335-:d:332076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.