IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i6p1317-d331607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic and Exergo-Advance Analysis of a Waste Heat Recovery System Based on Regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle under Organic Fluids with Low Global Warming Potential

Author

Listed:
  • Guillermo Valencia Ochoa

    (Programa de Ingeniería Mecánica, Universidad del Atlántico, Carrera 30 Número 8-49, Puerto Colombia, Barranquilla 080007, Colombia)

  • Cesar Isaza-Roldan

    (Programa de Ingeniería Mecánica, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín 050004, Colombia)

  • Jorge Duarte Forero

    (Programa de Ingeniería Mecánica, Universidad del Atlántico, Carrera 30 Número 8-49, Puerto Colombia, Barranquilla 080007, Colombia)

Abstract

The waste heat recovery system (WHRS) is a good alternative to provide a solution to the waste energy emanated in the exhaust gases of the internal combustion engine (ICE). Therefore, it is useful to carry out research to improve the thermal efficiency of the ICE through a WHRS based on the organic Rankine cycle (ORC), since this type of system takes advantage of the heat of the exhaust gases to generate electrical energy. The organic working fluid selection was developed according to environmental criteria, operational parameters, thermodynamic conditions of the gas engine, and investment costs. An economic analysis is presented for the systems operating with three selected working fluids: toluene, acetone, and heptane, considering the main costs involved in the design and operation of the thermal system. Furthermore, an exergo-advanced study is presented on the WHRS based on ORC integrated to the ICE, which is a Jenbacher JMS 612 GS-N of 2 MW power fueled with natural gas. This advanced exergetic analysis allowed us to know the opportunities for improvement of the equipment and the increase in the thermodynamic performance of the ICE. The results show that when using acetone as the organic working fluid, there is a greater tendency of improvement of endogenous character in Pump 2 of around 80%. When using heptane it was manifested that for the turbine there are near to 77% opportunities for improvement, and the use of toluene in the turbine gave a rate of improvement of 70%. Finally, some case studies are presented to study the effect of condensation temperature, the pinch point temperature in the evaporator, and the pressure ratio on the direct, indirect, and fixed investment costs, where the higher investment costs were presented with the acetone, and lower costs when using the toluene as working fluid.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Cesar Isaza-Roldan & Jorge Duarte Forero, 2020. "Economic and Exergo-Advance Analysis of a Waste Heat Recovery System Based on Regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle under Organic Fluids with Low Global Warming Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:6:p:1317-:d:331607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/6/1317/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/6/1317/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lai, Ngoc Anh & Wendland, Martin & Fischer, Johann, 2011. "Working fluids for high-temperature organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 199-211.
    2. Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Carlos Acevedo Peñaloza & Jorge Duarte Forero, 2019. "Thermo-Economic Assessment of a Gas Microturbine-Absorption Chiller Trigeneration System under Different Compressor Inlet Air Temperatures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Carlos Acevedo Peñaloza & Jorge Duarte Forero, 2019. "Thermoeconomic Optimization with PSO Algorithm of Waste Heat Recovery Systems Based on Organic Rankine Cycle System for a Natural Gas Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Eyerer, Sebastian & Wieland, Christoph & Vandersickel, Annelies & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2016. "Experimental study of an ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) and analysis of R1233zd-E as a drop-in replacement for R245fa for low temperature heat utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 660-671.
    5. Toffolo, Andrea & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Manente, Giovanni & Paci, Marco, 2014. "A multi-criteria approach for the optimal selection of working fluid and design parameters in Organic Rankine Cycle systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 219-232.
    6. Fadiran, Gideon & Adebusuyi, Adebisi T. & Fadiran, David, 2019. "Natural gas consumption and economic growth: Evidence from selected natural gas vehicle markets in Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 467-477.
    7. Petrakopoulou, Fontina & Tsatsaronis, George & Morosuk, Tatiana & Carassai, Anna, 2012. "Conventional and advanced exergetic analyses applied to a combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 146-152.
    8. Kelly, S. & Tsatsaronis, G. & Morosuk, T., 2009. "Advanced exergetic analysis: Approaches for splitting the exergy destruction into endogenous and exogenous parts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 384-391.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alvin Kiprono Bett & Saeid Jalilinasrabady, 2021. "Optimization of ORC Power Plants for Geothermal Application in Kenya by Combining Exergy and Pinch Point Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Konstantin Osintsev & Sergei Aliukov & Sulpan Kuskarbekova & Tatyana Tarasova & Aleksandr Karelin & Vladimir Konchakov & Olga Kornyakova, 2023. "Increasing Thermal Efficiency: Methods, Case Studies, and Integration of Heat Exchangers with Renewable Energy Sources and Heat Pumps for Desalination," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-36, June.
    3. Edwin Espinel Blanco & Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Jorge Duarte Forero, 2020. "Thermodynamic, Exergy and Environmental Impact Assessment of S-CO 2 Brayton Cycle Coupled with ORC as Bottoming Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Meriño Stand, L. & Valencia Ochoa, G. & Duarte Forero, J., 2021. "Energy and exergy assessment of a combined supercritical Brayton cycle-orc hybrid system using solar radiation and coconut shell biomass as energy source," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 119-142.
    5. Konstantin Osintsev & Sergei Aliukov, 2022. "ORC Technology Based on Advanced Li-Br Absorption Refrigerator with Solar Collectors and a Contact Heat Exchanger for Greenhouse Gas Capture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Farid Antonio Barrozo Budes & Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Luis Guillermo Obregon & Adriana Arango-Manrique & José Ricardo Núñez Álvarez, 2020. "Energy, Economic, and Environmental Evaluation of a Proposed Solar-Wind Power On-grid System Using HOMER Pro ® : A Case Study in Colombia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Dora Villada-Castillo & Guillermo Valencia-Ochoa & Jorge Duarte-Forero, 2023. "Thermohydraulic and Economic Evaluation of a New Design for Printed Circuit Heat Exchangers in Supercritical CO 2 Brayton Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bakhshmand, Sina Kazemi & Saray, Rahim Khoshbakhti & Bahlouli, Keyvan & Eftekhari, Hajar & Ebrahimi, Afshin, 2015. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a triple-pressure combined cycle plant using evolutionary algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 555-567.
    2. Li, Jing & Alvi, Jahan Zeb & Pei, Gang & Su, Yuehong & Li, Pengcheng & Gao, Guangtao & Ji, Jie, 2016. "Modelling of organic Rankine cycle efficiency with respect to the equivalent hot side temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 668-683.
    3. Mosaffa, A.H. & Garousi Farshi, L. & Infante Ferreira, C.A. & Rosen, M.A., 2014. "Advanced exergy analysis of an air conditioning system incorporating thermal energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 945-952.
    4. Wang, Zhiwen & Xiong, Wei & Ting, David S.-K. & Carriveau, Rupp & Wang, Zuwen, 2016. "Conventional and advanced exergy analyses of an underwater compressed air energy storage system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 810-822.
    5. Katulić, Stjepko & Čehil, Mislav & Schneider, Daniel Rolph, 2018. "Thermodynamic efficiency improvement of combined cycle power plant's bottom cycle based on organic working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 36-50.
    6. Boyaghchi, Fateme Ahmadi & Molaie, Hanieh, 2015. "Advanced exergy and environmental analyses and multi objective optimization of a real combined cycle power plant with supplementary firing using evolutionary algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2267-2279.
    7. Şöhret, Yasin & Açıkkalp, Emin & Hepbasli, Arif & Karakoc, T. Hikmet, 2015. "Advanced exergy analysis of an aircraft gas turbine engine: Splitting exergy destructions into parts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1219-1228.
    8. Erbay, Zafer & Hepbasli, Arif, 2017. "Assessment of cost sources and improvement potentials of a ground-source heat pump food drying system through advanced exergoeconomic analysis method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 502-515.
    9. Burak Yuksel & Ozgur Balli & Huseyin Gunerhan & Arif Hepbasli, 2020. "Comparative Performance Metric Assessment of A Military Turbojet Engine Utilizing Hydrogen And Kerosene Fuels Through Advanced Exergy Analysis Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H. & Navid, P. & Blanco Marigorta, A.M. & Amidpour, M. & Hamedi, M.H., 2013. "New procedure for optimal design and evaluation of cogeneration system based on advanced exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 314-333.
    11. Petrakopoulou, Fontina & Tsatsaronis, George & Morosuk, Tatiana & Paitazoglou, Christopher, 2012. "Environmental evaluation of a power plant using conventional and advanced exergy-based methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 23-30.
    12. Ebrahimi, Mehdi & Carriveau, Rupp & Ting, David S.-K. & McGillis, Andrew, 2019. "Conventional and advanced exergy analysis of a grid connected underwater compressed air energy storage facility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1198-1208.
    13. Burak Yuksel & Huseyin Gunerhan & Arif Hepbasli, 2020. "Assessing Exergy-Based Economic and Sustainability Analyses of a Military Gas Turbine Engine Fueled with Various Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-28, July.
    14. Mortazavi, Arsham & Ameri, Mehran, 2018. "Conventional and advanced exergy analysis of solar flat plate air collectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 277-288.
    15. Han, Xiaoqu & Liu, Ming & Wu, Kaili & Chen, Weixiong & Xiao, Feng & Yan, Junjie, 2016. "Exergy analysis of the flue gas pre-dried lignite-fired power system based on the boiler with open pulverizing system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 285-300.
    16. Onur Vahip Güler & Emine Yağız Gürbüz & Aleksandar G. Georgiev & Ali Keçebaş, 2023. "Advanced Exergoeconomic Assessment of CO 2 Emissions, Geo-Fluid and Electricity in Dual Loop Geothermal Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-24, April.
    17. Soltani, S. & Yari, M. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Morosuk, T. & Rosen, M.A., 2013. "Advanced exergy analysis applied to an externally-fired combined-cycle power plant integrated with a biomass gasification unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 775-780.
    18. Sun, Zhili & Wang, Qifan & Xie, Zhiyuan & Liu, Shengchun & Su, Dandan & Cui, Qi, 2019. "Energy and exergy analysis of low GWP refrigerants in cascade refrigeration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1170-1180.
    19. Mossi Idrissa, A.K. & Goni Boulama, K., 2019. "Advanced exergy analysis of a combined Brayton/Brayton power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 724-737.
    20. Dora Villada-Castillo & Guillermo Valencia-Ochoa & Jorge Duarte-Forero, 2023. "Thermohydraulic and Economic Evaluation of a New Design for Printed Circuit Heat Exchangers in Supercritical CO 2 Brayton Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:6:p:1317-:d:331607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.