IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i23p6404-d456669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of Restricting Parameters on Steps toward the Intermediate-Temperature Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cell

Author

Listed:
  • Yongqing Wang

    (School of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Bo An

    (School of Mechanics and Safety Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
    Key Laboratory of Process Heat Transfer and Energy Saving of Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Ke Wang

    (School of Mechanics and Safety Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
    Key Laboratory of Process Heat Transfer and Energy Saving of Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Yan Cao

    (Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Fan Gao

    (School of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
    Key Laboratory of Process Heat Transfer and Energy Saving of Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

Abstract

To identify critical parameters upon variable operational temperatures in a planar SOFC, an experimentally agreeable model was established. The significance of temperature effect on the performance of SOFC components was investigated, and the effect of activation energy during the development of intermediate electrode materials was evaluated. It is found the ionic conductivity of electrolytes is identified to be unavoidably concerned in the development of the intermediate-temperature SOFC. The drop of the ionic conductivity of the electrolyte decreases the overall current density 63% and 80% at temperatures reducing to 700 °C and 650 °C from 800 °C. However, there exists a critical value on the defined ratio between the electric resistance of the electrolyte in the overall internal resistance of SOFC, above which the further increase in the ionic conductivity would not significantly improve the performance. The lower the operational temperature, the higher critical ratio of the electrical resistance in the overall internal resistance of the cell. The minimal decrease in the activation energy during the development of intermediate electrode materials can significantly enhance the overall performance. Considering the development trend toward the intermediate temperature SOFC, advanced electrode material with the decreased activation energy should be primarily focused. The result provides a guidance reference for developing SOFC with the operational temperature toward the intermediate temperature.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongqing Wang & Bo An & Ke Wang & Yan Cao & Fan Gao, 2020. "Identification of Restricting Parameters on Steps toward the Intermediate-Temperature Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cell," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:23:p:6404-:d:456669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6404/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6404/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. El-Hay, E.A. & El-Hameed, M.A. & El-Fergany, A.A., 2019. "Optimized Parameters of SOFC for steady state and transient simulations using interior search algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 451-461.
    2. He, Zhongjie & Birgersson, E. & Li, Hua, 2014. "Reduced non-isothermal model for the planar solid oxide fuel cell and stack," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 478-492.
    3. Hajimolana, S. Ahmad & Hussain, M. Azlan & Daud, W.M. Ashri Wan & Soroush, M. & Shamiri, A., 2011. "Mathematical modeling of solid oxide fuel cells: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 1893-1917, May.
    4. Khazaee, I. & Rava, A., 2017. "Numerical simulation of the performance of solid oxide fuel cell with different flow channel geometries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 235-244.
    5. Jee Min Park & Dae Yun Kim & Jong Dae Baek & Yong-Jin Yoon & Pei-Chen Su & Seong Hyuk Lee, 2018. "Effect of Electrolyte Thickness on Electrochemical Reactions and Thermo-Fluidic Characteristics inside a SOFC Unit Cell," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Safari, Amin & Shahsavari, Hossein & Salehi, Javad, 2018. "A mathematical model of SOFC power plant for dynamic simulation of multi-machine power systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 397-413.
    7. Shixue Liu & Wei Kong & Zijing Lin, 2009. "A Microscale Modeling Tool for the Design and Optimization of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Lee, Yeageun & Park, Joonho & Yu, Wonjong & Tanveer, Waqas Hassan & Lee, Yoon Ho & Cho, Gu Young & Park, Taehyun & Zheng, Chunhua & Lee, Wonyoung & Cha, Suk Won, 2018. "Nickel-based bilayer thin-film anodes for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1133-1138.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongqing Wang & Xingchen Li & Zhenning Guo & Ke Wang & Yan Cao, 2021. "Effect of the Reactant Transportation on Performance of a Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cell," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Jee Min Park & Dae Yun Kim & Jong Dae Baek & Yong-Jin Yoon & Pei-Chen Su & Seong Hyuk Lee, 2018. "Effect of Electrolyte Thickness on Electrochemical Reactions and Thermo-Fluidic Characteristics inside a SOFC Unit Cell," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Wang, Chaoyang & Chen, Ming & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie, 2020. "Dynamic modeling and parameter analysis study on reversible solid oxide cells during mode switching transient processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    4. Xu, Yuan-wu & Wu, Xiao-long & Zhong, Xiao-bo & Zhao, Dong-qi & Sorrentino, Marco & Jiang, Jianhua & Jiang, Chang & Fu, Xiaowei & Li, Xi, 2021. "Mechanism model-based and data-driven approach for the diagnosis of solid oxide fuel cell stack leakage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    5. Guk, Erdogan & Venkatesan, Vijay & Babar, Shumaila & Jackson, Lisa & Kim, Jung-Sik, 2019. "Parameters and their impacts on the temperature distribution and thermal gradient of solid oxide fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 164-173.
    6. Wei Kong & Xiang Gao & Shixue Liu & Shichuan Su & Daifen Chen, 2014. "Optimization of the Interconnect Ribs for a Cathode-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cell," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Liu, Lijun & Qian, Jin & Hua, Li & Zhang, Bin, 2022. "System estimation of the SOFCs using fractional-order social network search algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    8. Tanveer, Waqas Hassan & Rezk, Hegazy & Nassef, Ahmed & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali & Kolosz, Ben & Karuppasamy, K. & Aslam, Jawad & Gilani, Syed Omer, 2020. "Improving fuel cell performance via optimal parameters identification through fuzzy logic based-modeling and optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    9. Zarabi Golkhatmi, Sanaz & Asghar, Muhammad Imran & Lund, Peter D., 2022. "A review on solid oxide fuel cell durability: Latest progress, mechanisms, and study tools," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    10. Rhushikesh Ghotkar & Ryan J. Milcarek, 2022. "Modeling of the Kinetic Factors in Flame-Assisted Fuel Cells," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Ramadhani, F. & Hussain, M.A. & Mokhlis, H. & Hajimolana, S., 2017. "Optimization strategies for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) application: A literature survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 460-484.
    12. Zhen Zhang & Chengzhi Guan & Leidong Xie & Jian-Qiang Wang, 2022. "Design and Analysis of a Novel Opposite Trapezoidal Flow Channel for Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell Stack," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Khazaee, I. & Rava, A., 2017. "Numerical simulation of the performance of solid oxide fuel cell with different flow channel geometries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 235-244.
    14. Chakrabarti, Mohammed Harun & Mjalli, Farouq Sabri & AlNashef, Inas Muen & Hashim, Mohd. Ali & Hussain, Mohd. Azlan & Bahadori, Laleh & Low, Chee Tong John, 2014. "Prospects of applying ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents for renewable energy storage by means of redox flow batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 254-270.
    15. Zeng, Zezhi & Qian, Yuping & Zhang, Yangjun & Hao, Changkun & Dan, Dan & Zhuge, Weilin, 2020. "A review of heat transfer and thermal management methods for temperature gradient reduction in solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) stacks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    16. He, Zhongjie & Li, Hua & Birgersson, E., 2016. "Correlating variability of modeling parameters with cell performance: Monte Carlo simulation of a quasi-3D planar solid oxide fuel cell," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1301-1315.
    17. Gong, Chengyuan & Tu, Zhengkai & Hwa Chan, Siew, 2023. "A novel flow field design with flow re-distribution for advanced thermal management in Solid oxide fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    18. Rossi, Iacopo & Traverso, Alberto & Tucker, David, 2019. "SOFC/Gas Turbine Hybrid System: A simplified framework for dynamic simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1543-1550.
    19. Hong Liu & Zoheb Akhtar & Peiwen Li & Kai Wang, 2014. "Mathematical Modeling Analysis and Optimization of Key Design Parameters of Proton-Conductive Solid Oxide Fuel Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, January.
    20. Eveloy, Valerie & Rodgers, Peter & Al Alili, Ali, 2017. "Multi-objective optimization of a pressurized solid oxide fuel cell – gas turbine hybrid system integrated with seawater reverse osmosis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 594-614.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:23:p:6404-:d:456669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.