IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2019i1p154-d302845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potable Reuse of Coalbed Methane-Produced Waters in Developing Country Contexts—Could the Benefits Outweigh the Costs to Facilitate Coal Transitions?

Author

Listed:
  • Udayan Singh

    (Department of Engineering Systems and Environment, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA)

  • Lisa M. Colosi

    (Department of Engineering Systems and Environment, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA)

Abstract

Development of coalbed methane (CBM) projects is critical to the achievement of climate change goals because it will help facilitate coal-to-gas transitions in Asia-Pacific countries with low conventional gas reserves. However, growth in CBM in these regions will necessitate strategic, sustainable approaches to produced water management. We posit that it may be possible to deliver synergistic water, energy, and health benefits by reusing CBM-produced waters as potable water supply in water-stressed coal-bearing regions. The goal of this study is to probabilistically evaluate life cycle costs and benefits of using reverse osmosis to treat CBM-produced water in the Damodar Valley coalfields in eastern India. Two treatment configurations are assessed, namely, centralized, and decentralized (i.e., in-home). We find that both configurations offer good cost-effectiveness based on two separately computed metrics to account for the value of health improvement benefits (i.e., disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted or monetized health benefits). We also observe that centralized systems are more cost-effective than decentralized, because they reduce capital cost and use-phase energy consumption per unit-volume treated. Average estimated values for the cost–benefit ratio are <0.5 and 1.0 for centralized and decentralized, respectively. Normalizing by anticipated health benefits, cost-effectiveness metrics are <$30/DALY for the centralized system versus <$200/DALY for the decentralized system. These results are highly sensitive to the value of statistical life and baseline water access. A related analysis taking into account both CBM-produced waters and mine waters revealed that deployment of reverse osmosis (RO) could provide drinking to approximately 3.5 million people over 20 years in the Damodar Valley region. These results have interesting implications not only for the study region but also for other CBM-producing countries experiencing chronic severe water stress.

Suggested Citation

  • Udayan Singh & Lisa M. Colosi, 2019. "Potable Reuse of Coalbed Methane-Produced Waters in Developing Country Contexts—Could the Benefits Outweigh the Costs to Facilitate Coal Transitions?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:154-:d:302845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/1/154/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/1/154/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel Shillcutt & Damian Walker & Catherine Goodman & Anne Mills, 2009. "Cost Effectiveness in Low- and Middle-Income Countries," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 27(11), pages 903-917, November.
    2. Krishna Malakar & Trupti Mishra & Anand Patwardhan, 2018. "Inequality in water supply in India: an assessment using the Gini and Theil indices," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 841-864, April.
    3. Cropper, Maureen L. & Guttikunda, Sarath & Jawahar, Puja & Lazri, Zachary & Malik, Kabir & Song, Xiao-Peng & Yao, Xinlu, 2019. "Applying Benefit-Cost Analysis to Air Pollution Control in the Indian Power Sector," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(S1), pages 185-205, April.
    4. Nandi, Arindam & Megiddo, Itamar & Ashok, Ashvin & Verma, Amit & Laxminarayan, Ramanan, 2017. "Reduced burden of childhood diarrheal diseases through increased access to water and sanitation in India: A modeling analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 181-192.
    5. Measrainsey Meng & Mo Chen & Kelly T. Sanders, 2016. "Evaluating the Feasibility of Using Produced Water from Oil and Natural Gas Production to Address Water Scarcity in California’s Central Valley," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yi Ge & Guangfei Yang & Yi Chen & Wen Dou, 2019. "Examining Social Vulnerability and Inequality: A Joint Analysis through a Connectivity Lens in the Urban Agglomerations of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Elisa Sicuri & Silke Fernandes & Eusebio Macete & Raquel González & Ghyslain Mombo-Ngoma & Achille Massougbodgi & Salim Abdulla & August Kuwawenaruwa & Abraham Katana & Meghna Desai & Michel Cot & Mic, 2015. "Economic Evaluation of an Alternative Drug to Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine as Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Neily Zakiyah & Antoinette D I van Asselt & Frank Roijmans & Maarten J Postma, 2016. "Economic Evaluation of Family Planning Interventions in Low and Middle Income Countries; A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Mansi Vijaybhai Dhami & Felix Akpojene Ogbo & Thierno M.O. Diallo & Kingsley E. Agho & on behalf of the Global Maternal and Child Health Research Collaboration (GloMACH), 2020. "Regional Analysis of Associations between Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices and Diarrhoea in Indian Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-15, July.
    5. B. Kelsey Jack & Seema Jayachandran & Namrata Kala & Rohini Pande, 2022. "Money (Not) to Burn: Payments for Ecosystem Services to Reduce Crop Residue Burning," NBER Working Papers 30690, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Zhao, Congyu & Jia, Rongwen & Dong, Kangyin, 2023. "Does financial inclusion achieve the dual dividends of narrowing carbon inequality within cities and between cities? Empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    7. Standaert, Baudouin & Schecroun, Nadia & Ethgen, Olivier & Topachevskyi, Oleksandr & Morioka, Yoriko & Van Vlaenderen, Ilse, 2017. "Optimising the introduction of multiple childhood vaccines in Japan: A model proposing the introduction sequence achieving the highest health gains," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(12), pages 1303-1312.
    8. Nadia Yakhelef & Martine Audibert & Gabriella Ferlazzo & Joseph Sitienei & Steve Wanjala & Francis Varaine & Maryline Bonnet & Helena Huerga, 2020. "Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic algorithms including lateral-flow urine lipoarabinomannan for HIV-positive patients with symptoms of tuberculosis," Post-Print halshs-03170014, HAL.
    9. Gesine Meyer-Rath & Craig van Rensburg & Bruce Larson & Lise Jamieson & Sydney Rosen, 2017. "Revealed willingness-to-pay versus standard cost-effectiveness thresholds: Evidence from the South African HIV Investment Case," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-9, October.
    10. Stephanie Bogdewic & Rohit Ramaswamy & David M Goodman & Emmanuel K Srofenyoh & Sebnem Ucer & Medge D Owen, 2020. "The cost-effectiveness of a program to reduce intrapartum and neonatal mortality in a referral hospital in Ghana," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Khachapon Nimdet & Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk & Kittaya Vichansavakul & Surachat Ngorsuraches, 2015. "A Systematic Review of Studies Eliciting Willingness-to-Pay per Quality-Adjusted Life Year: Does It Justify CE Threshold?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Narasimha D. Rao & Gregor Kiesewetter & Jihoon Min & Shonali Pachauri & Fabian Wagner, 2021. "Household contributions to and impacts from air pollution in India," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(10), pages 859-867, October.
    13. Kota Ogasawara & Yukitoshi Matsushita, 2019. "Heterogeneous treatment effects of safe water on infectious disease: Do meteorological factors matter?," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 13(1), pages 55-82, January.
    14. Hoffmann, Vivian & Jones, Kelly, 2021. "Improving food safety on the farm: Experimental evidence from Kenya on incentives and subsidies for technology adoption," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    15. Dandan Zhang & Juqin Shen & Pengfei Liu & Qian Zhang & Fuhua Sun, 2020. "Use of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Environmental Gini Coefficient for Allocation of Regional Flood Drainage Rights," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Can Zhang & Jixia Li & Tengfei Liu & Mengzhi Xu & Huachun Wang & Xu Li, 2022. "The Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of the Chinese Cities’ Ecological Welfare Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-27, October.
    17. Maureen Cropper & Yongjoon Park, 2022. "The health benefits of air pollution control in India," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 245-263, December.
    18. Greg Plosker, 2011. "Rotavirus Vaccine RIX4414 (Rotarix™)," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 29(11), pages 989-1009, November.
    19. Echchelh, Alban & Hess, Tim & Sakrabani, Ruben, 2020. "Agro-environmental sustainability and financial cost of reusing gasfield-produced water for agricultural irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    20. Gwenan M Knight & Gabriela B Gomez & Peter J Dodd & David Dowdy & Alice Zwerling & William A Wells & Frank Cobelens & Anna Vassall & Richard G White, 2015. "The Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of a Four-Month Regimen for First-Line Treatment of Active Tuberculosis in South Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:154-:d:302845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.