IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i7p1829-d157624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Evaluation of Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure with Algal Digestate

Author

Listed:
  • Na Duan

    (College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xia Ran

    (College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Ruirui Li

    (College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Panagiotis G. Kougias

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark)

  • Yuanhui Zhang

    (College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
    Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA)

  • Cong Lin

    (College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Hongbin Liu

    (Key Laboratory of Nonpoint Source Pollution Control, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

Dilution is considered to be a fast and easily applicable pretreatment for anaerobic digestion (AD) of chicken manure (CM), however, dilution with fresh water is uneconomical because of the water consumption. The present investigation was targeted at evaluating the feasibility and process performance of AD of CM diluted with algal digestate water (AW) for methane production to replace tap water (TW). Moreover, the kinetics parameters and mass flow of the AD process were also comparatively analyzed. The highest methane production of diluted CM (104.39 mL/g volatile solid (VS)) was achieved with AW under a substrate concentration of 8% total solid (TS). The result was markedly higher in comparison with the group with TW (79.54–93.82 mL/gVS). Apart from the methane production, considering its energy and resource saving, nearly 20% of TW replaced by AW, it was promising substitution to use AW for TW to dilute CM. However, the process was susceptible to substrate concentration, inoculum, as well as total ammonia and free ammonia concentration.

Suggested Citation

  • Na Duan & Xia Ran & Ruirui Li & Panagiotis G. Kougias & Yuanhui Zhang & Cong Lin & Hongbin Liu, 2018. "Performance Evaluation of Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure with Algal Digestate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-11, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:7:p:1829-:d:157624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/7/1829/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/7/1829/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsapekos, P. & Kougias, P.G. & Egelund, H. & Larsen, U. & Pedersen, J. & Trénel, P. & Angelidaki, I., 2017. "Mechanical pretreatment at harvesting increases the bioenergy output from marginal land grasses," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 914-921.
    2. Matheri, A.N. & Ndiweni, S.N. & Belaid, M. & Muzenda, E. & Hubert, R., 2017. "Optimising biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure and organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 756-764.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dae-Yeol Cheong & Jeffrey Todd Harvey & Jinsu Kim & Changsoo Lee, 2019. "Improving Biomethanation of Chicken Manure by Co-Digestion with Ethanol Plant Effluent," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Nicoletta Gronchi & Lorenzo Favaro & Lorenzo Cagnin & Silvia Brojanigo & Valentino Pizzocchero & Marina Basaglia & Sergio Casella, 2019. "Novel Yeast Strains for the Efficient Saccharification and Fermentation of Starchy By-Products to Bioethanol," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Alberto Benato & Alarico Macor, 2019. "Italian Biogas Plants: Trend, Subsidies, Cost, Biogas Composition and Engine Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-31, March.
    4. Xiaoshan Meng & Yuxiu Zhang & Qianwen Sui & Junya Zhang & Rui Wang & Dawei Yu & Yawei Wang & Yuansong Wei, 2018. "Biochemical Conversion and Microbial Community in Response to Ternary pH Buffer System during Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Manure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Claudia Maurer & Julia Seiler-Petzold & Rudolf Schulz & Joachim Müller, 2019. "Short-Term Nitrogen Uptake of Barley from Differently Processed Biogas Digestate in Pot Experiments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Dimitar Karakashev & Yifeng Zhang, 2018. "BioEnergy and BioChemicals Production from Biomass and Residual Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-6, August.
    7. Shabib, Ahmad & Abdallah, Mohamed & Shanableh, Abdallah & Sartaj, Majid, 2022. "Effect of substrates and voltages on the performance of bio-electrochemical anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 16-27.
    8. Spyridon Achinas & Johan Horjus & Vasileios Achinas & Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink, 2019. "A PESTLE Analysis of Biofuels Energy Industry in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed A. Hassaan & Antonio Pantaleo & Francesco Santoro & Marwa R. Elkatory & Giuseppe De Mastro & Amany El Sikaily & Safaa Ragab & Ahmed El Nemr, 2020. "Techno-Economic Analysis of ZnO Nanoparticles Pretreatments for Biogas Production from Barley Straw," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Ao, Tianjie & Chen, Lin & Chen, Yichao & Liu, Xiaofeng & Wan, Liping & Li, Dong, 2021. "The screening of early warning indicators and microbial community of chicken manure thermophilic digestion at high organic loading rate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    3. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Wainaina, Steven & Rajendran, Karthik & Kumar, Sumit & Quan, Wang & Duan, Yumin & Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar & Chen, Hongyu & Pandey, Ashok & Zhang, Zengqiang , 2019. "A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 115-131.
    4. Huayong Zhang & Di An & Yudong Cao & Yonglan Tian & Jinxian He, 2021. "Modeling the Methane Production Kinetics of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Agricultural Wastes Using Sigmoidal Functions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, January.
    5. Dandikas, Vasilis & Heuwinkel, Hauke & Lichti, Fabian & Eckl, Thomas & Drewes, Jörg E. & Koch, Konrad, 2018. "Correlation between hydrolysis rate constant and chemical composition of energy crops," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 34-42.
    6. Peng, Valerie & Slocum, Alexander, 2020. "Endemic Water and Storm Trash to energy via in-situ processing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. Zhou, Man & Li, Cheng & Ni, Fuquan & Chen, Anjun & Li, Meiliang & Shen, Guanghui & Deng, Yu & Deng, Liangwei, 2022. "Packed activated carbon particles triggered a more robust syntrophic pathway for acetate oxidation-hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis at extremely high ammonia concentrations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 305-317.
    8. Józef Szlachta & Hubert Prask & Małgorzata Fugol & Adam Luberański, 2018. "Effect of Mechanical Pre-Treatment of the Agricultural Substrates on Yield of Biogas and Kinetics of Anaerobic Digestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Navodita Bhatnagar & David Ryan & Richard Murphy & Anne-Marie Enright, 2020. "Trace Element Supplementation and Enzyme Addition to Enhance Biogas Production by Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Litter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, July.
    10. Sunčica Beluhan & Katarina Mihajlovski & Božidar Šantek & Mirela Ivančić Šantek, 2023. "The Production of Bioethanol from Lignocellulosic Biomass: Pretreatment Methods, Fermentation, and Downstream Processing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-38, October.
    11. KeChrist Obileke & Golden Makaka & Nwabunwanne Nwokolo, 2022. "Efficient Methane Production from Anaerobic Digestion of Cow Dung: An Optimization Approach," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, October.
    12. Izabela Konkol & Lesław Świerczek & Adam Cenian, 2023. "Chicken Manure Pretreatment for Enhancing Biogas and Methane Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-13, July.
    13. Kasinath, Archana & Fudala-Ksiazek, Sylwia & Szopinska, Malgorzata & Bylinski, Hubert & Artichowicz, Wojciech & Remiszewska-Skwarek, Anna & Luczkiewicz, Aneta, 2021. "Biomass in biogas production: Pretreatment and codigestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    14. Dehkordi, Seyed Mohammad Mehdi Noorbakhsh & Jahromi, Ahmad Reza Taghipour & Ferdowsi, Ali & Shumal, Mohammad & Dehnavi, Ali, 2020. "Investigation of biogas production potential from mechanical separated municipal solid waste as an approach for developing countries (case study: Isfahan-Iran)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    15. Essam M. Abdelsalam & Mohamed Samer & Mariam A. Amer & Baher M. A. Amer, 2021. "Biogas production using dry fermentation technology through co-digestion of manure and agricultural wastes," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 8746-8757, June.
    16. Jiang, Y. & Xie, S.H. & Dennehy, C. & Lawlor, P.G. & Hu, Z.H. & Wu, G.X. & Zhan, X.M. & Gardiner, G.E., 2020. "Inactivation of pathogens in anaerobic digestion systems for converting biowastes to bioenergy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    17. Wu, Bo & Wang, Yan-Wei & Dai, Yong-Hua & Song, Chao & Zhu, Qi-Li & Qin, Han & Tan, Fu-Rong & Chen, Han-Cheng & Dai, Li-Chun & Hu, Guo-Quan & He, Ming-Xiong, 2021. "Current status and future prospective of bio-ethanol industry in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    18. Muyiwa Lawrence Adedara & Ridwan Taiwo & Hans-Rudolf Bork, 2023. "Municipal Solid Waste Collection and Coverage Rates in Sub-Saharan African Countries: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," Waste, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-25, April.
    19. Rezania, Shahabaldin & Oryani, Bahareh & Cho, Jinwoo & Talaiekhozani, Amirreza & Sabbagh, Farzaneh & Hashemi, Beshare & Rupani, Parveen Fatemeh & Mohammadi, Ali Akbar, 2020. "Different pretreatment technologies of lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production: An overview," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    20. Likang Deng & Jun Li, 2021. "Thread Rolling: An Efficient Mechanical Pretreatment for Corn Stover Saccharification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-9, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:7:p:1829-:d:157624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.