IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i6p1541-d152305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forecasting the Long-Term Wind Data via Measure-Correlate-Predict (MCP) Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Sajid Ali

    (Smart City Construction Engineering, University of Science & Technology (UST), 217, Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34113, Korea
    Environmental & Plant Engineering Research Division, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT), Daehwa-dong 283, Goyangdae-ro, Ilsanseo-Gu, Goyang-si 10223, Korea)

  • Sang-Moon Lee

    (Environmental & Plant Engineering Research Division, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT), Daehwa-dong 283, Goyangdae-ro, Ilsanseo-Gu, Goyang-si 10223, Korea)

  • Choon-Man Jang

    (Smart City Construction Engineering, University of Science & Technology (UST), 217, Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34113, Korea
    Environmental & Plant Engineering Research Division, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT), Daehwa-dong 283, Goyangdae-ro, Ilsanseo-Gu, Goyang-si 10223, Korea)

Abstract

The current study aims to forecast and analyze wind data such as wind speed at a test site called “Urumsill” on Deokjeok Island, South Korea. The measured wind data available at the aforementioned test site are only for two years (2015 and 2016), making it impossible to analyze the long-term wind characteristics. In order to overcome this problem, two measure-correlate-predict (MCP) techniques were adopted using long-term wind data (2000–2016), measured by a meteorological mast (met-mast) installed at a distance of 3 km from the test site. The wind data measured at the test site in 2016 were selected as training data to build the MCP models, whereas wind data of 2015 were used to test the accuracy of MCP models (test data). The wind data at both sites were measured at a height of 10 m and showed a good agreement for the year 2016 (training period). Using the comparison results of the year 2016, wind speed predictions were made for the rest of the years (2000–2016) at the test site. The forecasted values of wind speed had maximum relative error in the range of ±0.8 m/s for the test year of 2105. The predicted wind data values were further analyzed by estimating the mean wind speed, the Weibull shape, and the scale parameters, on a seasonal and an annual basis, in order to understand the wind behavior in the region. The accuracy and presence of possible errors in the forecasted wind data are discussed and presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Sajid Ali & Sang-Moon Lee & Choon-Man Jang, 2018. "Forecasting the Long-Term Wind Data via Measure-Correlate-Predict (MCP) Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:6:p:1541-:d:152305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/6/1541/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/6/1541/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Islam, M.R. & Saidur, R. & Rahim, N.A., 2011. "Assessment of wind energy potentiality at Kudat and Labuan, Malaysia using Weibull distribution function," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 985-992.
    2. Carta, J.A. & Ramírez, P. & Velázquez, S., 2009. "A review of wind speed probability distributions used in wind energy analysis: Case studies in the Canary Islands," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 933-955, June.
    3. Angelis-Dimakis, Athanasios & Biberacher, Markus & Dominguez, Javier & Fiorese, Giulia & Gadocha, Sabine & Gnansounou, Edgard & Guariso, Giorgio & Kartalidis, Avraam & Panichelli, Luis & Pinedo, Irene, 2011. "Methods and tools to evaluate the availability of renewable energy sources," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 1182-1200, February.
    4. Ali, Sajid & Lee, Sang-Moon & Jang, Choon-Man, 2018. "Statistical analysis of wind characteristics using Weibull and Rayleigh distributions in Deokjeok-do Island – Incheon, South Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 652-663.
    5. Sajid Ali & Sang-Moon Lee & Choon-Man Jang, 2017. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Wind Energy Potential at Three Locations in South Korea Using Long-Term Measured Wind Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Oliver Probst & Diego Cárdenas, 2010. "State of the Art and Trends in Wind Resource Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(6), pages 1-55, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Woochul Nam & Ki-Yong Oh, 2020. "Mutually Complementary Measure-Correlate-Predict Method for Enhanced Long-Term Wind-Resource Assessment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Mazhar Hussain Baloch & Dahaman Ishak & Sohaib Tahir Chaudary & Baqir Ali & Ali Asghar Memon & Touqeer Ahmed Jumani, 2019. "Wind Power Integration: An Experimental Investigation for Powering Local Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Mekalathur B Hemanth Kumar & Saravanan Balasubramaniyan & Sanjeevikumar Padmanaban & Jens Bo Holm-Nielsen, 2019. "Wind Energy Potential Assessment by Weibull Parameter Estimation Using Multiverse Optimization Method: A Case Study of Tirumala Region in India," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carta, José A. & Velázquez, Sergio & Cabrera, Pedro, 2013. "A review of measure-correlate-predict (MCP) methods used to estimate long-term wind characteristics at a target site," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 362-400.
    2. El Alimi, Souheil & Maatallah, Taher & Dahmouni, Anouar Wajdi & Ben Nasrallah, Sassi, 2012. "Modeling and investigation of the wind resource in the gulf of Tunis, Tunisia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5466-5478.
    3. Arslan, Talha & Bulut, Y. Murat & Altın Yavuz, Arzu, 2014. "Comparative study of numerical methods for determining Weibull parameters for wind energy potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 820-825.
    4. Jianxing Yu & Yiqin Fu & Yang Yu & Shibo Wu & Yuanda Wu & Minjie You & Shuai Guo & Mu Li, 2019. "Assessment of Offshore Wind Characteristics and Wind Energy Potential in Bohai Bay, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Dong, Yao & Wang, Jianzhou & Jiang, He & Shi, Xiaomeng, 2013. "Intelligent optimized wind resource assessment and wind turbines selection in Huitengxile of Inner Mongolia, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 239-253.
    6. Sajid Ali & Choon-Man Jang, 2020. "Optimum Design of Hybrid Renewable Energy System for Sustainable Energy Supply to a Remote Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Sergei Kolesnik & Yossi Rabinovitz & Michael Byalsky & Asher Yahalom & Alon Kuperman, 2023. "Assessment of Wind Speed Statistics in Samaria Region and Potential Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-35, May.
    8. Masseran, Nurulkamal, 2015. "Evaluating wind power density models and their statistical properties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 533-541.
    9. Fazelpour, Farivar & Markarian, Elin & Soltani, Nima, 2017. "Wind energy potential and economic assessment of four locations in Sistan and Balouchestan province in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 646-667.
    10. Chang, Tian-Pau & Liu, Feng-Jiao & Ko, Hong-Hsi & Cheng, Shih-Ping & Sun, Li-Chung & Kuo, Shye-Chorng, 2014. "Comparative analysis on power curve models of wind turbine generator in estimating capacity factor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 88-95.
    11. Bagci, Kubra & Arslan, Talha & Celik, H. Eray, 2021. "Inverted Kumarswamy distribution for modeling the wind speed data: Lake Van, Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    12. Jiang, Haiyan & Wang, Jianzhou & Wu, Jie & Geng, Wei, 2017. "Comparison of numerical methods and metaheuristic optimization algorithms for estimating parameters for wind energy potential assessment in low wind regions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1199-1217.
    13. Đurišić, Željko & Mikulović, Jovan, 2012. "Assessment of the wind energy resource in the South Banat region, Serbia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3014-3023.
    14. Sajid Ali & Choon-Man Jang, 2019. "Selection of Best-Suited Wind Turbines for New Wind Farm Sites Using Techno-Economic and GIS Analysis in South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.
    15. Usta, Ilhan, 2016. "An innovative estimation method regarding Weibull parameters for wind energy applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 301-314.
    16. Zhou, Zhe & Zhang, Jianyun & Liu, Pei & Li, Zheng & Georgiadis, Michael C. & Pistikopoulos, Efstratios N., 2013. "A two-stage stochastic programming model for the optimal design of distributed energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 135-144.
    17. Mehr Gul & Nengling Tai & Wentao Huang & Muhammad Haroon Nadeem & Moduo Yu, 2020. "Evaluation of Wind Energy Potential Using an Optimum Approach based on Maximum Distance Metric," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, March.
    18. Rahimi, Ehsan & Rabiee, Abdorreza & Aghaei, Jamshid & Muttaqi, Kashem M. & Esmaeel Nezhad, Ali, 2013. "On the management of wind power intermittency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 643-653.
    19. Dinler, Ali, 2013. "A new low-correlation MCP (measure-correlate-predict) method for wind energy forecasting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 152-160.
    20. Ali, Sajid & Lee, Sang-Moon & Jang, Choon-Man, 2018. "Statistical analysis of wind characteristics using Weibull and Rayleigh distributions in Deokjeok-do Island – Incheon, South Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 652-663.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:6:p:1541-:d:152305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.