IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i5p1218-d145581.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ash and Flue Gas from Oil Shale Oxy-Fuel Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion

Author

Listed:
  • Lauri Loo

    (Department of Energy Technology, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia)

  • Alar Konist

    (Department of Energy Technology, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia)

  • Dmitri Neshumayev

    (Department of Energy Technology, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia)

  • Tõnu Pihu

    (Department of Energy Technology, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia)

  • Birgit Maaten

    (Department of Energy Technology, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia)

  • Andres Siirde

    (Department of Energy Technology, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia)

Abstract

Carbon dioxide emissions are considered a major environmental threat. To enable power production from carbon-containing fuels, carbon capture is required. Oxy-fuel combustion technology facilitates carbon capture by increasing the carbon dioxide concentration in flue gas. This study reports the results of calcium rich oil shale combustion in a 60 kW th circulating fluidized bed (CFB) combustor. The focus was on the composition of the formed flue gas and ash during air and oxy-fuel combustion. The fuel was typical Estonian oil shale characterized by high volatile and ash contents. No additional bed material was used in the CFB; the formed ash was enough for the purpose. Two modes of oxy-fuel combustion were investigated and compared with combustion in air. When N 2 in the oxidizer was replaced with CO 2 , the CFB temperatures decreased by up to 100 °C. When oil shale was fired in the CFB with increased O 2 content in CO 2 , the temperatures in the furnace were similar to combustion in air. In air mode, the emissions of SO 2 and NO x were low (<14 and 141 mg/Nm 3 @ 6% O 2 , respectively). Pollutant concentrations in the flue gas during oxy-fuel operations remained low (for OXY30 SO 2 < 14 and NO x 130 mg/Nm 3 @ 6% O 2 and for OXY21 SO 2 23 and NO x 156 mg/Nm 3 @ 6% O 2 ). Analyses of the collected ash samples showed a decreased extent of carbonate minerals decomposition during both oxy-fuel experiments. This results in decreased carbon dioxide emissions. The outcomes show that oxy-fuel CFB combustion of the oil shale ensures sulfur binding and decreases CO 2 production.

Suggested Citation

  • Lauri Loo & Alar Konist & Dmitri Neshumayev & Tõnu Pihu & Birgit Maaten & Andres Siirde, 2018. "Ash and Flue Gas from Oil Shale Oxy-Fuel Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:5:p:1218-:d:145581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/5/1218/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/5/1218/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roos, Inge & Soosaar, Sulev & Volkova, Anna & Streimikene, Dalia, 2012. "Greenhouse gas emission reduction perspectives in the Baltic States in frames of EU energy and climate policy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 2133-2146.
    2. Leckner, Bo & Gómez-Barea, Alberto, 2014. "Oxy-fuel combustion in circulating fluidized bed boilers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 308-318.
    3. Junjiao Zhang & Yongping Yang & Xiaoying Hu & Changqing Dong & Qiang Lu & Wu Qin, 2011. "Experimental Research on Heterogeneous N 2 O Decomposition with Ash and Biomass Gasification Gas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(11), pages 1-11, November.
    4. Bobo Zheng & Jiuping Xu, 2014. "Carbon Capture and Storage Development Trends from a Techno-Paradigm Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-30, August.
    5. Kai Lei & Buqing Ye & Jin Cao & Rui Zhang & Dong Liu, 2017. "Combustion Characteristics of Single Particles from Bituminous Coal and Pine Sawdust in O 2 /N 2 , O 2 /CO 2 , and O 2 /H 2 O Atmospheres," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, October.
    6. E.J.(Ben) Anthony, 2013. "Oxyfuel CFBC: status and anticipated development," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 3(2), pages 116-123, April.
    7. Neshumayev, Dmitri & Rummel, Leo & Konist, Alar & Ots, Arvo & Parve, Teet, 2018. "Power plant fuel consumption rate during load cycling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 124-135.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natalia Czaplicka & Donata Konopacka-Łyskawa, 2020. "Utilization of Gaseous Carbon Dioxide and Industrial Ca-Rich Waste for Calcium Carbonate Precipitation: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, November.
    2. Saia, Artjom & Neshumayev, Dmitri & Hazak, Aaro & Sander, Priit & Järvik, Oliver & Konist, Alar, 2022. "Techno-economic assessment of CO2 capture possibilities for oil shale power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Andrey Rogalev & Nikolay Rogalev & Vladimir Kindra & Ivan Komarov & Olga Zlyvko, 2021. "Research and Development of the Oxy-Fuel Combustion Power Cycles with CO 2 Recirculation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Luis Míguez & Jacobo Porteiro & Raquel Pérez-Orozco & Miguel Ángel Gómez, 2018. "Technology Evolution in Membrane-Based CCS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Li, Shiyuan & Xu, Mingxin & Jia, Lufei & Tan, Li & Lu, Qinggang, 2016. "Influence of operating parameters on N2O emission in O2/CO2 combustion with high oxygen concentration in circulating fluidized bed," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 197-209.
    3. Cross, Sam & Hast, Aira & Kuhi-Thalfeldt, Reeli & Syri, Sanna & Streimikiene, Dalia & Denina, Arta, 2015. "Progress in renewable electricity in Northern Europe towards EU 2020 targets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1768-1780.
    4. Wil Burns & Simon Nicholson, 2017. "Bioenergy and carbon capture with storage (BECCS): the prospects and challenges of an emerging climate policy response," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 7(4), pages 527-534, December.
    5. Hu, Yukun & Wang, Jihong & Tan, CK & Sun, Chenggong & Liu, Hao, 2018. "Coupling detailed radiation model with process simulation in Aspen Plus: A case study on fluidized bed combustor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 168-179.
    6. Yan, Hui & Liu, Ming & Wang, Zhu & Zhang, Kezhen & Chong, Daotong & Yan, Junjie, 2023. "Flexibility enhancement of solar-aided coal-fired power plant under different direct normal irradiance conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    7. Zhang, Xinshuo & Huang, Weibin & Chen, Shijun & Xie, Diya & Liu, Dexu & Ma, Guangwen, 2020. "Grid–source coordinated dispatching based on heterogeneous energy hybrid power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    8. Bobinaite, Viktorija, 2015. "Financial sustainability of wind electricity sectors in the Baltic States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 794-815.
    9. Amna Abdeljaoued & Nausika Querejeta & Inés Durán & Noelia Álvarez-Gutiérrez & Covadonga Pevida & Mohamed Hachemi Chahbani, 2018. "Preparation and Evaluation of a Coconut Shell-Based Activated Carbon for CO 2 /CH 4 Separation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, July.
    10. Xu, Mingxin & Li, Shiyuan & Wu, Yinghai & Jia, Lufei & Lu, Qinggang, 2017. "The characteristics of recycled NO reduction over char during oxy-fuel fluidized bed combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 553-562.
    11. Furuoka, Fumitaka, 2017. "Renewable electricity consumption and economic development: New findings from the Baltic countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 450-463.
    12. Xu, Jiuping & Li, Li & Zheng, Bobo, 2016. "Wind energy generation technological paradigm diffusion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 436-449.
    13. Fridahl, Mathias, 2017. "Socio-political prioritization of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 89-99.
    14. Peter Viebahn & Emile J. L. Chappin, 2018. "Scrutinising the Gap between the Expected and Actual Deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-45, September.
    15. Peter Viebahn & Daniel Vallentin & Samuel Höller, 2015. "Integrated Assessment of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) in South Africa’s Power Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-27, December.
    16. Streimikiene, Dalia & Balezentis, Tomas, 2013. "Multi-objective ranking of climate change mitigation policies and measures in Lithuania," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 144-153.
    17. Liobikienė, Genovaitė & Butkus, Mindaugas & Bernatonienė, Jurga, 2016. "Drivers of greenhouse gas emissions in the Baltic states: decomposition analysis related to the implementation of Europe 2020 strategy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 309-317.
    18. Furqan Tahir & Haider Ali & Ahmer A.B. Baloch & Yasir Jamil, 2019. "Performance Analysis of Air and Oxy-Fuel Laminar Combustion in a Porous Plate Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, May.
    19. Balezentiene, Ligita & Streimikiene, Dalia & Balezentis, Tomas, 2013. "Fuzzy decision support methodology for sustainable energy crop selection," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 83-93.
    20. Seddighi, Sadegh & Clough, Peter T. & Anthony, Edward J. & Hughes, Robin W. & Lu, Ping, 2018. "Scale-up challenges and opportunities for carbon capture by oxy-fuel circulating fluidized beds," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 527-542.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:5:p:1218-:d:145581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.