IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i1p133-d125676.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Critical Analysis and Validation of the Accuracy of Wave Overtopping Prediction Formulae for OWECs

Author

Listed:
  • David Gallach-Sánchez

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Ghent University, Technologiepark 904, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium)

  • Peter Troch

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Ghent University, Technologiepark 904, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium)

  • Andreas Kortenhaus

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Ghent University, Technologiepark 904, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium)

Abstract

The development of wave energy devices is growing in recent years. One type of device is the overtopping wave energy converter (OWEC), for which the knowledge of the wave overtopping rates is a basic and crucial aspect in their design. In particular, the most interesting range to study is for OWECs with steep slopes to vertical walls, and with very small freeboards and zero freeboards where the overtopping rate is maximized, and which can be generalized as steep low-crested structures. Recently, wave overtopping prediction formulae have been published for this type of structures, although their accuracy has not been fully assessed, as the overtopping data available in this range is scarce. We performed a critical analysis of the overtopping prediction formulae for steep low-crested structures and the validation of the accuracy of these formulae, based on new overtopping data for steep low-crested structures obtained at Ghent University. This paper summarizes the existing knowledge about average wave overtopping, describes the physical model tests performed, analyses the results and compares them to existing prediction formulae. The new dataset extends the wave overtopping data towards vertical walls and zero freeboard structures. In general, the new dataset validated the more recent overtopping formulae focused on steep slopes with small freeboards, although the formulae are underpredicting the average overtopping rates for very small and zero relative crest freeboards.

Suggested Citation

  • David Gallach-Sánchez & Peter Troch & Andreas Kortenhaus, 2018. "A Critical Analysis and Validation of the Accuracy of Wave Overtopping Prediction Formulae for OWECs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:133-:d:125676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/1/133/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/1/133/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margheritini, L. & Vicinanza, D. & Frigaard, P., 2009. "SSG wave energy converter: Design, reliability and hydraulic performance of an innovative overtopping device," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1371-1380.
    2. Diego Vicinanza & Lucia Margheritini & Jens Peter Kofoed & Mariano Buccino, 2012. "The SSG Wave Energy Converter: Performance, Status and Recent Developments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-34, January.
    3. Tedd, James & Peter Kofoed, Jens, 2009. "Measurements of overtopping flow time series on the Wave Dragon, wave energy converter," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 711-717.
    4. Kofoed, Jens Peter & Frigaard, Peter & Friis-Madsen, Erik & Sørensen, Hans Chr., 2006. "Prototype testing of the wave energy converter wave dragon," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 181-189.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hu, Huakun & Xue, Wendong & Jiang, Peng & Li, Yong, 2022. "Bibliometric analysis for ocean renewable energy: An comprehensive review for hotspots, frontiers, and emerging trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Zhen & Shi, Hongda & Cui, Ying & Kim, Kilwon, 2017. "Experimental study on overtopping performance of a circular ramp wave energy converter," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 163-176.
    2. Kushal A. Prasad & Aneesh A. Chand & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Sumesh Narayan & Kabir A. Mamun, 2022. "A Critical Review of Power Take-Off Wave Energy Technology Leading to the Conceptual Design of a Novel Wave-Plus-Photon Energy Harvester for Island/Coastal Communities’ Energy Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-55, February.
    3. Mustapa, M.A. & Yaakob, O.B. & Ahmed, Yasser M. & Rheem, Chang-Kyu & Koh, K.K. & Adnan, Faizul Amri, 2017. "Wave energy device and breakwater integration: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 43-58.
    4. Martins, J.C. & Goulart, M.M. & Gomes, M. das N. & Souza, J.A. & Rocha, L.A.O. & Isoldi, L.A. & dos Santos, E.D., 2018. "Geometric evaluation of the main operational principle of an overtopping wave energy converter by means of Constructal Design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 727-741.
    5. José Manuel Oliver & Maria Dolores Esteban & José-Santos López-Gutiérrez & Vicente Negro & Maria Graça Neves, 2021. "Optimizing Wave Overtopping Energy Converters by ANN Modelling: Evaluating the Overtopping Rate Forecasting as the First Step," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, February.
    6. Claudio Iuppa & Pasquale Contestabile & Luca Cavallaro & Enrico Foti & Diego Vicinanza, 2016. "Hydraulic Performance of an Innovative Breakwater for Overtopping Wave Energy Conversion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Dina Silva & Eugen Rusu & Carlos Guedes Soares, 2013. "Evaluation of Various Technologies for Wave Energy Conversion in the Portuguese Nearshore," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Veigas, M. & López, M. & Iglesias, G., 2014. "Assessing the optimal location for a shoreline wave energy converter," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 404-411.
    9. James Allen & Konstantinos Sampanis & Jian Wan & Deborah Greaves & Jon Miles & Gregorio Iglesias, 2016. "Laboratory Tests in the Development of WaveCat," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Tunde Aderinto & Hua Li, 2019. "Review on Power Performance and Efficiency of Wave Energy Converters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-24, November.
    11. Eugen Rusu, 2014. "Evaluation of the Wave Energy Conversion Efficiency in Various Coastal Environments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Iglesias, G. & Carballo, R., 2011. "Wave resource in El Hierro—an island towards energy self-sufficiency," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 689-698.
    13. Jin, Huaqing & Zhang, Haicheng & Xu, Daolin & Jun, Ding & Ze, Sun, 2022. "Low-frequency energy capture and water wave attenuation of a hybrid WEC-breakwater with nonlinear stiffness," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1029-1047.
    14. López-Ruiz, Alejandro & Bergillos, Rafael J. & Ortega-Sánchez, Miguel, 2016. "The importance of wave climate forecasting on the decision-making process for nearshore wave energy exploitation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 191-203.
    15. Raúl Cascajo & Emilio García & Eduardo Quiles & Antonio Correcher & Francisco Morant, 2019. "Integration of Marine Wave Energy Converters into Seaports: A Case Study in the Port of Valencia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, February.
    16. Collins, Ieuan & Hossain, Mokarram & Dettmer, Wulf & Masters, Ian, 2021. "Flexible membrane structures for wave energy harvesting: A review of the developments, materials and computational modelling approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    17. Kovaleva, Olga & Eelsalu, Maris & Soomere, Tarmo, 2017. "Hot-spots of large wave energy resources in relatively sheltered sections of the Baltic Sea coast," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 424-437.
    18. Giannini, Gianmaria & López, Mario & Ramos, Victor & Rodríguez, Claudio A. & Rosa-Santos, Paulo & Taveira-Pinto, Francisco, 2021. "Geometry assessment of a sloped type wave energy converter," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 672-686.
    19. Zanuttigh, Barbara & Angelelli, Elisa & Kortenhaus, Andreas & Koca, Kaan & Krontira, Yukiko & Koundouri, Phoebe, 2016. "A methodology for multi-criteria design of multi-use offshore platforms for marine renewable energy harvesting," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1271-1289.
    20. Kamran Khalifehei & Gholamreza Azizyan & Carlo Gualtieri, 2018. "Analyzing the Performance of Wave-Energy Generator Systems (SSG) for the Southern Coasts of Iran, in the Persian Gulf and Oman Sea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:133-:d:125676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.