IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v9y2019i2p39-d207154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of Irrigation Termination Date on Cotton Yield and Irrigation Requirement

Author

Listed:
  • Blessing Masasi

    (Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA)

  • Saleh Taghvaeian

    (Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA)

  • Randy Boman

    (Formerly Southwest Research and Extension Center, Oklahoma State University, Altus, OK 73521, USA)

  • Sumon Datta

    (Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA)

Abstract

Optimization of cotton irrigation termination (IT) can lead to more efficient utilization and conservation of limited water resources in many cotton production areas across the U.S. This study evaluated the effects of three IT timings on yield, fiber quality, and irrigation requirements of irrigated cotton in southwest Oklahoma during three growing seasons. The results showed cotton yield increased with later IT dates, but this response was highly dependent on the amount and timing of late-season precipitation events. Only a few fiber quality parameters were significantly different among treatments, suggesting a more limited impact of IT on fiber quality. When averaged over the three study years, the lint yield was significantly different amongst all treatments, with an average increase of 347 kg ha −1 from the earliest to the latest IT. Additionally, the seed yield and the micronaire were similar for the two earlier IT treatments and significantly smaller than the values under the latest IT treatment. The differences in fiber uniformity and strength were also significant amongst IT treatments. Strong positive relationships were found between yield components and average late-season water content in the root zone. Lint and seed yields plateaued at an average late-season soil matric potential of about −30 kPa and had a quadratic decline as soil moisture depleted. When benchmarked against the latest IT treatment, the earlier IT treatments achieved average reductions of 16–28% in irrigation requirement. However, this water conservation was accompanied with considerable declines in yield components and micronaire and smaller declines in fiber length, uniformity, and strength.

Suggested Citation

  • Blessing Masasi & Saleh Taghvaeian & Randy Boman & Sumon Datta, 2019. "Impacts of Irrigation Termination Date on Cotton Yield and Irrigation Requirement," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:39-:d:207154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/9/2/39/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/9/2/39/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evers, A. J. M. & Elliott, R. L. & Stevens, E. W., 1998. "Integrated decision making for reservoir, irrigation, and crop management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 529-554, December.
    2. Krueger, Erik S. & Yimam, Yohannes Tadesse & Ochsner, Tyson E., 2017. "Human factors were dominant drivers of record low streamflow to a surface water irrigation district in the US southern Great Plains," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 93-104.
    3. Karam, Fadi & Lahoud, Rafic & Masaad, Randa & Daccache, Andre & Mounzer, Oussama & Rouphael, Youssef, 2006. "Water use and lint yield response of drip irrigated cotton to the length of irrigation season," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 287-295, October.
    4. Wanjura, Donald F. & Upchurch, Dan R. & Mahan, James R. & Burke, John J., 2002. "Cotton yield and applied water relationships under drip irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 217-237, June.
    5. Jadwiga R. Ziolkowska, 2018. "Profitability of irrigation and value of water in Oklahoma and Texas agriculture," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 944-960, November.
    6. Stone, J. F. & Nofziger, D. L., 1993. "Water use and yields of cotton grown under wide-spaced furrow irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 27-38, September.
    7. Larson, James A. & Mapp, Harry P. & Verhalen, Laval M. & Banks, J. C., 1996. "Adapting a cotton model for decision analyses: a yield-response evaluation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 145-167.
    8. Ziolkowska, Jad R., 2018. "Profitability of Irrigation and Value of Water in the Southern High Plains," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274355, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Cetin, O. & Bilgel, L., 2002. "Effects of different irrigation methods on shedding and yield of cotton," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Buttar, G.S. & Aujla, M.S. & Thind, H.S. & Singh, C.J. & Saini, K.S., 2007. "Effect of timing of first and last irrigation on the yield and water use efficiency in cotton," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 236-242, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Komlan Koudahe & Aleksey Y. Sheshukov & Jonathan Aguilar & Koffi Djaman, 2021. "Irrigation-Water Management and Productivity of Cotton: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Tong Wu & Shida Rastegari Henneberry & John N. Ng’ombe & Richard T. Melstrom, 2020. "Chinese Demand for Agritourism in Rural America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-11, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Komlan Koudahe & Aleksey Y. Sheshukov & Jonathan Aguilar & Koffi Djaman, 2021. "Irrigation-Water Management and Productivity of Cotton: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Ünlü, Mustafa & Kanber, RIza & Koç, D. Levent & Tekin, Servet & Kapur, Burçak, 2011. "Effects of deficit irrigation on the yield and yield components of drip irrigated cotton in a mediterranean environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 597-605, February.
    3. Kang, Yaohu & Wang, Ruoshui & Wan, Shuqin & Hu, Wei & Jiang, Shufang & Liu, Shiping, 2012. "Effects of different water levels on cotton growth and water use through drip irrigation in an arid region with saline ground water of Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 117-126.
    4. Oweis, T.Y. & Farahani, H.J. & Hachum, A.Y., 2011. "Evapotranspiration and water use of full and deficit irrigated cotton in the Mediterranean environment in northern Syria," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(8), pages 1239-1248, May.
    5. Papastylianou, Panayiota T. & Argyrokastritis, Ioannis G., 2014. "Effect of limited drip irrigation regime on yield, yield components, and fiber quality of cotton under Mediterranean conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 127-134.
    6. DeTar, W.R., 2008. "Yield and growth characteristics for cotton under various irrigation regimes on sandy soil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 69-76, January.
    7. Cheng, Minghui & Wang, Haidong & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Shaohui & Wang, Yanli & Li, Yuepeng & Sun, Xin & Yang, Ling & Zhang, Fucang, 2021. "Water productivity and seed cotton yield in response to deficit irrigation: A global meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    8. Aujla, M.S. & Thind, H.S. & Buttar, G.S., 2005. "Cotton yield and water use efficiency at various levels of water and N through drip irrigation under two methods of planting," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 167-179, February.
    9. Dagdelen, N. & Basal, H. & YIlmaz, E. & Gürbüz, T. & Akçay, S., 2009. "Different drip irrigation regimes affect cotton yield, water use efficiency and fiber quality in western Turkey," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 111-120, January.
    10. Shareef, Muhammad & Gui, Dongwei & Zeng, Fanjiang & Waqas, Muhammad & Zhang, Bo & Iqbal, Hassan, 2018. "Water productivity, growth, and physiological assessment of deficit irrigated cotton on hyperarid desert-oases in northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1-10.
    11. Fan, Yubing & Wang, Chenggang & Nan, Zhibiao, 2018. "Determining water use efficiency of wheat and cotton: A meta-regression analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 48-60.
    12. Thind, H.S. & Aujla, M.S. & Buttar, G.S., 2008. "Response of cotton to various levels of nitrogen and water applied to normal and paired sown cotton under drip irrigation in relation to check-basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 25-34, January.
    13. Brar, Harjeet Singh & Singh, Pritpal, 2022. "Pre-and post-sowing irrigation scheduling impacts on crop phenology and water productivity of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in sub-tropical north-western India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    14. Fan, Yubing & Wang, Chenggang & Nan, Zhibiao, 2016. "Determining water use efficiency for wheat and cotton: A meta-regression analysis," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 236059, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Andrew Young & James Mahan & William Dodge & Paxton Payton, 2020. "BLOB-Based AOMs: A Method for the Extraction of Crop Data from Aerial Images of Cotton," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    16. Shareef, Muhammad & Gui, Dongwei & Zeng, Fanjiang & Waqas, Muhammad & Ahmed, Zeeshan & Zhang, Bo & Iqbal, Hassan & Xue, Jie, 2019. "Nitrogen leaching, recovery efficiency, and cotton productivity assessments on desert-sandy soil under various application methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Himanshu, Sushil Kumar & Ale, Srinivasulu & Bordovsky, James & Darapuneni, Murali, 2019. "Evaluation of crop-growth-stage-based deficit irrigation strategies for cotton production in the Southern High Plains," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    18. Eric Njuki & Boris E. Bravo-Ureta, 2019. "Examining irrigation productivity in U.S. agriculture using a single-factor approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 125-136, June.
    19. Hafiz Shahzad Ahmad & Muhammad Imran & Fiaz Ahmad & Shah Rukh & Rao Muhammad Ikram & Hafiz Muhammad Rafique & Zafar Iqbal & Abdulaziz Abdullah Alsahli & Mohammed Nasser Alyemeni & Shafaqat Ali & Tanve, 2021. "Improving Water Use Efficiency through Reduced Irrigation for Sustainable Cotton Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, April.
    20. Pongspikul, Tayatorn & McCann, Laura M., 2020. "Farmers’ Adoption of Pressure Irrigation Systems: The Case of Cotton Producers in the Southeastern versus Southwestern U.S," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304332, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:39-:d:207154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.