IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v10y2020i3p39-d381959.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Survival and Growth in Innovative Technology Entrepreneurship: A Mixed-Methods Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Stelios Eliakis

    (ELTRUN e-Business Research Center, Department of Management Science and Technology, Athens University of Economics and Business, 10434 Athens, Greece
    All authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Dimosthenis Kotsopoulos

    (ELTRUN e-Business Research Center, Department of Management Science and Technology, Athens University of Economics and Business, 10434 Athens, Greece
    All authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Angeliki Karagiannaki

    (ELTRUN e-Business Research Center, Department of Management Science and Technology, Athens University of Economics and Business, 10434 Athens, Greece
    All authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Katerina Pramatari

    (ELTRUN e-Business Research Center, Department of Management Science and Technology, Athens University of Economics and Business, 10434 Athens, Greece
    All authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Innovative technology enterprises are recognized internationally as an important pillar in modern economic activity. This paper presents the findings from a research combining qualitative and quantitative methods, with the specific goal of identifying and verifying the characteristics that affect their survival and growth. Results from an in-depth longitudinal qualitative case study, that examines a mature and constantly growing (in its 10-year operation) technologically innovative enterprise, reveal that a number of characteristics pertaining to both the profile of the entrepreneurial team, as well as of the employees, significantly affect company survival and growth in this context. Moreover, we recognize and analyze three stages in its evolution: an initial “evolutionary” growth (infancy and youth), followed by a “revolutionary” (crisis), and a second “evolutionary” (maturity) stage. Our findings are further corroborated and enriched through a survey with N = 27 entrepreneurs in innovative technology startups. We contribute to existing literature on innovative technology entrepreneurship, by identifying characteristics that entrepreneurs and employees should bear, towards its survival and growth. Moreover, a practical application of the life cycle approach is described for technologically innovative companies. Finally, a specific prescription that can help guide future theoretical and practical endeavors in innovative technology entrepreneurship is also provided accordingly.

Suggested Citation

  • Stelios Eliakis & Dimosthenis Kotsopoulos & Angeliki Karagiannaki & Katerina Pramatari, 2020. "Survival and Growth in Innovative Technology Entrepreneurship: A Mixed-Methods Investigation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-36, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:39-:d:381959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/10/3/39/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/10/3/39/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jussi Okkonen, 2004. "How virtuality affects knowledge work: points on performance and knowledge management," International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 153-161.
    2. Satish Nambisan, 2017. "Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(6), pages 1029-1055, November.
    3. Zhongfeng Su (苏中锋) & Jisheng Peng (彭纪生) & Hao Shen (沈灏) & Ting Xiao (肖婷), 2013. "Technological Capability, Marketing Capability, and Firm Performance in Turbulent Conditions. 技术能力、市场能力与企业绩效：基于环境不确定性的研究," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 9(1), pages 115-137, March.
    4. Qing He & Terence Tai‐Leung Chong & Li Li & Jun Zhang, 2010. "A Competing Risks Analysis of Corporate Survival," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 39(4), pages 1697-1718, December.
    5. Berry, Charles H, 1971. "Corporate Growth and Diversification," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 14(2), pages 371-384, October.
    6. Connie Marie Gaglio, 2004. "The Role of Mental Simulations and Counterfactual Thinking in the Opportunity Identification Process," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 28(6), pages 533-552, November.
    7. Cooper, Arnold C., 1993. "Challenges in predicting new firm performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 241-253, May.
    8. Colombo, Massimo G. & Grilli, Luca, 2005. "Founders' human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 795-816, August.
    9. Clyde Eiríkur Hull & Yu-Ting Caisy Hung & Neil Hair & Victor Perotti & Richard DeMartino, 2007. "Taking advantage of digital opportunities: a typology of digital entrepreneurship," International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(3), pages 290-303.
    10. Murray B. Low, 2001. "The Adolescence of Entrepreneurship Research: Specification of Purpose," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(4), pages 17-26, July.
    11. Norman R. Smith & John B. Miner, 1983. "Type of entrepreneur, type of firm, and managerial motivation: Implications for organizational life cycle theory," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(4), pages 325-340, October.
    12. Amason, Allen C. & Shrader, Rodney C. & Tompson, George H., 2006. "Newness and novelty: Relating top management team composition to new venture performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 125-148, January.
    13. Dimo Dimov, 2007. "Beyond the Single-Person, Single-Insight Attribution in Understanding Entrepreneurial Opportunities," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 31(5), pages 713-731, September.
    14. Zaheer, Hasnain & Breyer, Yvonne & Dumay, John, 2019. "Digital entrepreneurship: An interdisciplinary structured literature review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    15. Raphael Amit & Lawrence Glosten & Eitan Muller, 1993. "Challenges To Theory Development In Entrepreneurship Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 815-834, September.
    16. Kuratko, Donald F. & Covin, Jeffrey G. & Hornsby, Jeffrey S., 2014. "Why implementing corporate innovation is so difficult," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 57(5), pages 647-655.
    17. Hans-Gerd Ridder, 2017. "The theory contribution of case study research designs," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 10(2), pages 281-305, October.
    18. Hyytinen, Ari & Pajarinen, Mika & Rouvinen, Petri, 2015. "Does innovativeness reduce startup survival rates?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 564-581.
    19. Yasemin Y. Kor & Vilmos F. Misangyi, 2008. "Outside directors' industry‐specific experience and firms' liability of newness," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(12), pages 1345-1355, December.
    20. Donald C. Hambrick & Richard A. D'Aveni, 1992. "Top Team Deterioration as Part of the Downward Spiral of Large Corporate Bankruptcies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(10), pages 1445-1466, October.
    21. Cardon, Melissa S. & Zietsma, Charlene & Saparito, Patrick & Matherne, Brett P. & Davis, Carolyn, 2005. "A tale of passion: New insights into entrepreneurship from a parenthood metaphor," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 23-45, January.
    22. Lai, Wen-Hsiang & Lin, Chiu-Ching, 2015. "Constructing business incubation service capabilities for tenants at post-entrepreneurial phase," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2285-2289.
    23. Bruton, Garry D. & Rubanik, Yuri, 2002. "Resources of the firm, Russian high-technology startups, and firm growth," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 553-576, October.
    24. Rita Gunther McGrath & Ming-Hone Tsai & S. Venkataraman & I. C. MacMillan, 1996. "Innovation, Competitive Advantage and Rent: A Model and Test," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 389-403, March.
    25. Alberto Onetti & Antonella Zucchella & Marian Jones & Patricia McDougall-Covin, 2012. "Internationalization, innovation and entrepreneurship: business models for new technology-based firms," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(3), pages 337-368, August.
    26. Su, Zhongfeng & Peng, Jisheng & Shen, Hao & Xiao, Ting, 2013. "Technological Capability, Marketing Capability, and Firm Performance in Turbulent Conditions," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, pages 115-138.
    27. Su, Zhongfeng & Peng, Jisheng & Shen, Hao & Xiao, Ting, 2013. "Technological Capability, Marketing Capability, and Firm Performance in Turbulent Conditions," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 115-137, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dejan Djordjevic & Dragan Cockalo & Srdjan Bogetic & Mihalj Bakator, 2021. "Predicting Entrepreneurial Intentions among the Youth in Serbia with a Classification Decision Tree Model with the QUEST Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(13), pages 1-27, June.
    2. Dewi Prastiwi & Erlina Diamastuti, 2023. "Building Trust and Enhancing Tax Compliance: The Role of Authoritarian Procedures and Respectful Treatment in Indonesia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Atzmon, Morane Batya & Vanderstraeten, Johanna & Albers, Sascha, 2022. "Small-firm growth-enabling capabilities: A framework for young technology-based firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    4. Tomasz Ingram & Katarzyna Bratnicka-Myśliwiec & Teresa Kraśnicka & Izabella Steinerowska-Streb, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Orientation as a Determinant of Sustainable Performance in Polish Family and Non-Family Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Ikhlas F. Zamzami, 2021. "The key enabling criteria of e-entrepreneurship evolving practices and implementation in Saudi Arabia," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(9), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Hernita Hernita & Batara Surya & Iwan Perwira & Herminawaty Abubakar & Muhammad Idris, 2021. "Economic Business Sustainability and Strengthening Human Resource Capacity Based on Increasing the Productivity of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Makassar City, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-36, March.
    7. Luísa Cagica Carvalho & Maria José Madeira, 2021. "Innovation Management and Entrepreneurship—Introduction," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-5, July.
    8. Piotr Kordel & Radosław Wolniak, 2021. "Technology Entrepreneurship and the Performance of Enterprises in the Conditions of Covid-19 Pandemic: The Fuzzy Set Analysis of Waste to Energy Enterprises in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kotsopoulos, Dimosthenis & Karagianaki, Angeliki & Baloutsos, Stratos, 2022. "The effect of human capital, innovation capacity, and Covid-19 crisis on Knowledge-Intensive Enterprises’ growth within a VC-driven innovation ecosystem," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1177-1191.
    2. Zabara, Tatiana, 2019. "Evolution of entrepreneurial teams in technology-based new ventures," Other publications TiSEM cc09d065-3811-47b6-9c93-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Riaqa Mubeen & Dongping Han & Jaffar Abbas & Iftikhar Hussain, 2020. "The Effects of Market Competition, Capital Structure, and CEO Duality on Firm Performance: A Mediation Analysis by Incorporating the GMM Model Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Liwen Wang & Jin Jason Lu & Kevin Zhou, 2023. "Technological Capability Strength/Asymmetry and Supply Chain Process Innovation: The Contingent Roles of Institutional Environments in China," Post-Print hal-03954124, HAL.
    5. Dong Wang & Daojun Sun & Xiaofeng Yu & Yihao Zhang, 2014. "The Impact of CEO Duality and Ownership on the Relationship Between Organisational Slack and Firm Performance in China," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 94-101, January.
    6. Katarzyna Bratnicka & Monika Kulikowska-Pawlak, 2016. "Towards an Integrated Framework for Corporate Entrepreneurship (W kierunku zintegrowanej struktury nosnej przedsiebiorczego przedsiebiorstwa)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 14(62), pages 24-35.
    7. Nuscheler, Daniela & Engelen, Andreas & Zahra, Shaker A., 2019. "The role of top management teams in transforming technology-based new ventures' product introductions into growth," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 122-140.
    8. Zaheer, Hasnain & Breyer, Yvonne & Dumay, John & Enjeti, Mahesh, 2022. "The entrepreneurial journeys of digital start-up founders," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    9. Syeda Humayra Abedin & Humaira Haque & Tanjina Shahjahan & Md Nurul Kabir, 2022. "Institutional Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Bejjani, Melissa & Göcke, Lutz & Menter, Matthias, 2023. "Digital entrepreneurial ecosystems: A systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    11. Denis A. Grégoire & Martin X. Noël & Richard Déry & Jean–Pierre Béchard, 2006. "Is There Conceptual Convergence in Entrepreneurship Research? A Co–Citation Analysis of Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1981–2004," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(3), pages 333-373, May.
    12. Mirza Waseem Abbas* & Dr. Masood ul Hassan, 2018. "The Moderation Effect of External Environment Turbulence in Tourism Sector: Comparative Analysis of Pakistan & Thailand," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 672-684:2.
    13. Chege, Samwel Macharia & Wang, Daoping, 2020. "The influence of technology innovation on SME performance through environmental sustainability practices in Kenya," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    14. Bo Yu & Shengbin Hao & David Ahlstrom & Steven Si & Dapeng Liang, 2014. "Entrepreneurial firms’ network competence, technological capability, and new product development performance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 687-704, September.
    15. Tobias Kollmann & Lucas Kleine-Stegemann & Katharina Cruppe & Christina Then-Bergh, 2022. "Eras of Digital Entrepreneurship," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(1), pages 15-31, February.
    16. Melek Akın Ateş & Robert Suurmond & Davide Luzzini & Daniel Krause, 2022. "Order from chaos: A meta‐analysis of supply chain complexity and firm performance," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(1), pages 3-30, January.
    17. Chen, Xiaoyun & Zou, Huan & Wang, Danny T., 2009. "How do new ventures grow? Firm capabilities, growth strategies and performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 294-303.
    18. Dejin Su & Qixia Du & Dongwon Sohn & Libo Xu, 2017. "Can High-Tech Ventures Benefit from Government Guanxi and Business Guanxi ? The Moderating Effects of Environmental Turbulence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Chege, Samwel Macharia & Wang, Daoping & Suntu, Shaldon Leparan & Bishoge, Obadia Kyetuza, 2019. "Influence of technology transfer on performance and sustainability of standard gauge railway in developing countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 79-92.
    20. Zhongfeng Su & Jie Chen & Hai Guo & Donghan Wang, 2022. "Top management team’s participative decision-making, heterogeneity, and management innovation: an information processing perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 149-171, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:39-:d:381959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.