IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fem/femre3/2015.07-04.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Emissions Trading in China: Features and Compliance of Pilots and their Transition to a Nationwide Scheme

Author

Listed:
  • ZhongXiang Zhang

    (College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China and School of Economics, Fudan University, Shanghai, China)

Abstract

The Chinese government has approved seven pilot carbon trading schemes. These pilot regions are deliberately selected to be at varying stages of development and are given considerable leeway to design their own schemes. These schemes have features in common, but vary considerably in their approach to a variety of issues, such as the coverage of sectors, allocation of allowances, price uncertainty, and enforcement and compliance. This article examines key features and compliance of China’s carbon trading pilots, lessons learned in the pilots, and the transition from the pilots to a national carbon trading scheme. Insights offered into the design, implementation and compliance of China’s carbon trading pilots and potential pathways help make these pilots work reliably and effectively and smooth the transition from the pilots to a national carbon trading scheme.

Suggested Citation

  • ZhongXiang Zhang, 2015. "Carbon Emissions Trading in China: Features and Compliance of Pilots and their Transition to a Nationwide Scheme," Review of Environment, Energy and Economics - Re3, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:fem:femre3:2015.07-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.feem.it/getpage.aspx?id=7724
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Zengkai & Zhang, Zhongxiang, 2017. "Intermediate input linkage and carbon leakage," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(6), pages 725-746, December.
    2. Wei, Liqun & Zhang, Jianxiong & Dai, Rui & Zhu, Guowei, 2019. "Green flexible vs. inflexible capacity strategies for duopoly," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 247-267.
    3. Liang Nie & ZhongXiang Zhang, 2021. "Is high-speed rail green? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Working Papers 2021.23, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    4. Chang, Kai & Ye, Zhifang & Wang, Weihong, 2019. "Volatility spillover effect and dynamic correlation between regional emissions allowances and fossil energy markets: New evidence from China’s emissions trading scheme pilots," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1314-1324.
    5. Huang, Jingchang & Cao, June & Hasan, Tahseen & Zhao, Jing, 2021. "Low-carbon city initiatives and firm risk: A quasi-natural experiment in China," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    6. Yan Xiao & Yan Zhang & Jiekuan Zhang, 2023. "The Impact of Carbon Emission Trading on Industrial Green Total Factor Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Zhao, Yibing & Wang, Can & Sun, Yuwei & Liu, Xianbing, 2018. "Factors influencing companies' willingness to pay for carbon emissions: Emission trading schemes in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 357-367.
    8. Zhang, Kun & Yao, Yun-Fei & Liang, Qiao-Mei & Saren, Gaowa, 2021. "How should China prioritize the deregulation of electricity prices in the context of carbon pricing? A computable general equilibrium analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pilot carbon trading schemes; Design; implementation and compliance; National carbon trading scheme; China;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q43 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Energy and the Macroeconomy
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy
    • Q52 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fem:femre3:2015.07-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alberto Prina Cerai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feemmit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.