IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/mesame/vhtml10.3280-mesa2014-090005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost accounting del follow-up annuo per il controllo remoto dei defibrillatori impiantabili

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriele Palozzi
  • Antonio Chirico
  • Leonardo Cal?

Abstract

Lo studio propone una valutazione dei costi diretti connessi all?erogazione della prestazione di controllo annuale ICD, distinguendo tra quei costi sopportati dall?Azienda Ospedaliera o dal singolo paziente e comparando quelli rilevati utilizzando un follow-up di controllo remoto (RM), rispetto a quelli necessari al convenzionale controllo ambulatoriale trimestrale. 233 pazienti impiantati con ICD sono stati raggruppati in due popolazioni omogenee d?indagine e seguiti complessivamente per 12 ? 3 mesi. Nell?ambito concettuale del direct costing, i costi rilevati attraverso un?analisi basata sull?ABC sono stati individuati utilizzando interviste e raccolte dati empiriche. L?analisi rivela che i costi direttamente imputabili al sostenimento della prestazione sono nettamente inferiori nel gruppo in RM rispetto all?alternativa; ogni paziente risparmia circa 156 ? per anno, mentre la struttura ospedaliera pu? risparmiare circa 20 ? per paziente/anno.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriele Palozzi & Antonio Chirico & Leonardo Cal?, 2014. "Cost accounting del follow-up annuo per il controllo remoto dei defibrillatori impiantabili," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(90), pages 71-98.
    • Handle: RePEc:fan:mesame:v:html10.3280/mesa2014-090005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=52193&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sloan,Frank A. (ed.), 1996. "Valuing Health Care," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521576468.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luca Del Bene & Antonello De Vito & Carlo Milli & Fabio Guarracino, 2018. "L?introduzione di un sistema di prezzi di trasferimento. Il caso dell?Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 35-60.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahesh D. Pandey & Jatin S. Nathwani, 2003. "Canada Wide Standard for Particulate Matter and Ozone: Cost‐Benefit Analysis Using a Life Quality Index," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(1), pages 55-67, February.
    2. Andronis, Lazaros & Maredza, Mandy & Petrou, Stavros, 2019. "Measuring, valuing and including forgone childhood education and leisure time costs in economic evaluation: Methods, challenges and the way forward," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Stolpe, Michael, 2003. "Ressourcen und Ergebnisse der globalen Gesundheitsökonomie: Einführung und Überblick," Kiel Working Papers 1177, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    4. Ruediger Rackwitz, 2004. "Optimal and Acceptable Technical Facilities Involving Risks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 675-695, June.
    5. Rackwitz, Rüdiger, 2006. "The effect of discounting, different mortality reduction schemes and predictive cohort life tables on risk acceptability criteria," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(4), pages 469-484.
    6. Johansson-Stenman, Olof & Martinsson, Peter, 2003. "Are Some Lives More Valuable?," Working Papers in Economics 96, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    7. Werner, Perla & Vered, Iris, 2002. "Women's knowledge of new regulations about publicly funded medications for osteoporosis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 275-284, June.
    8. repec:kap:iaecre:v:14:y:2008:i:3:p:329-335 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Sebastian Gurtner, 2013. "An analysis of the influence of framework aspects on the study design of health economic modeling evaluations," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(2), pages 221-230, April.
    10. Elodie Adida & Hamed Mamani & Shima Nassiri, 2017. "Bundled Payment vs. Fee-for-Service: Impact of Payment Scheme on Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1606-1624, May.
    11. Raikou, Maria & McGuire, Alistair, 2009. "Parametric estimation of medical care costs under conditions of censoring," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 28857, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Christopher J.L. Murray & David B. Evans & Arnab Acharya & Rob M.P.M. Baltussen, 2000. "Development of WHO guidelines on generalized cost‐effectiveness analysis," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(3), pages 235-251, April.
    13. Calcott, Paul, 2000. "Health care evaluation, utilitarianism and distortionary taxes," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 719-730, September.
    14. William S. Cartwright, 1998. "Cost-Benefit and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Drug Abuse Treatment Services," Evaluation Review, , vol. 22(5), pages 609-636, October.
    15. Theodore E. Keeler & Teh‐wei Hu & Alison Keith & Richard Manning & Martin D. Marciniak & Michael Ong & Hai‐Yen Sung, 2002. "The benefits of switching smoking cessation drugs to over‐the‐counter status," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(5), pages 389-402, July.
    16. Irfan Cicin & Ergun Oksuz & Nuri Karadurmus & Simten Malhan & Mahmut Gumus & Ulku Yilmaz & Levent Cansever & Halit Cinarka & Erdogan Cetinkaya & Murat Kiyik & Ahmet Ozet, 2021. "Economic burden of lung cancer in Turkey: a cost of illness study from payer perspective," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    17. A. Freeman, 2006. "Valuing Environmental Health Effects – An Economic Perspective," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 34(3), pages 347-363, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:mesame:v:html10.3280/mesa2014-090005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=180 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.