IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eut/journl/v13y2008i2p113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stretching EU Frontiers toward East: The Consequences for Agricultural Trade Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Hossein Pirasteh

    (Associate Professor at the Department of Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran)

  • Mohammad Sayadi

    (MA student at the Department of Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran)

  • Mohammad Saghafi

    (MA student at the Department of Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran)

Abstract

In May 2004, ten countries joined the European Union. Most of these countries that are located in the central and eastern part of Europe have different historical background and economic structure, compared to the older EU members. One of the pertinent issues of EU Accession is the economic consequences for the countries neighboring the enlarged EU and the impact on trade of between these countries. The implication of regional economic cooperation and competition for all the EU members and countries located further to the East of EU, including countries in the Middle East and Central Asia in terms of resource allocation, the concentration of economic activities and its welfare implications, all depends upon how the new economic opportunities are exploited. The main purpose of this paper is to measure the degree and extent of comparative advantage in agricultural crop production and to compare the results for the enlarged European Union and countries located further toward the eastern frontier of the EU. The Bowen comparative advantage index as well as a simple regression model will be used in this regard. This paper will highlight the relative strengths and weaknesses of the countries in this ‘bloc” in exploiting their agricultural trade potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Hossein Pirasteh & Mohammad Sayadi & Mohammad Saghafi, 2008. "Stretching EU Frontiers toward East: The Consequences for Agricultural Trade Integration," Iranian Economic Review (IER), Faculty of Economics,University of Tehran.Tehran,Iran, vol. 13(2), pages 113-141, fall.
  • Handle: RePEc:eut:journl:v:13:y:2008:i:2:p:113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://80.66.179.253/eut/journl/20082-6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan V. Deardorff, 2011. "The General Validity of the Law of Comparative Advantage," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Robert M Stern (ed.), Comparative Advantage, Growth, And The Gains From Trade And Globalization A Festschrift in Honor of Alan V Deardorff, chapter 10, pages 73-90, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Drabicki, John Z. & Takayama, Akira, 1979. "An antinomy in the theory of comparative advantage," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 211-223, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Svensson, Lars E.O., 1984. "Factor trade and goods trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3-4), pages 365-378, May.
    2. James E. Anderson, 2011. "The Gravity Model," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 3(1), pages 133-160, September.
    3. Costinot, Arnaud & Werning, Iván, 2018. "Robots, Trade, and Luddism: A Sufficient Statistic Approach to Optimal Technology Regulation," CEPR Discussion Papers 13209, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Alan Deardorff, 1994. "Exploring the limits of comparative advantage," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 130(1), pages 1-19, March.
    5. James Harrigan, 2001. "Specialization and the Volume of Trade: Do the Data Obey the Laws?," NBER Working Papers 8675, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Görg, Holger & Kneller, Richard & Muraközy, Balázs, 2007. "What Makes a Successful Export?," CEPR Discussion Papers 6614, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Siu‐kee Wong, 2006. "The adjustment of external tariffs in the Kemp‐Wan‐Grinols compensation scheme," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(2), pages 544-563, May.
    8. Ethier, Wilfred J. & Svensson, Lars E. O., 1986. "The theoremes of international trade with factor mobility," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1-2), pages 21-42, February.
    9. Maneschi, Andrea, 2004. "The true meaning of David Ricardo's four magic numbers," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 433-443, March.
    10. Vollrath, Thomas L., 1983. "Factors Affecting Agricultural Trade: An Intercountry Empirical Inquiry," Staff Reports 324726, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Arnaud Costinot, 2009. "An Elementary Theory of Comparative Advantage," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1165-1192, July.
    12. Alan V Deardorff, 2011. "How Robust is Comparative Advantage?," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Robert M Stern (ed.), Comparative Advantage, Growth, And The Gains From Trade And Globalization A Festschrift in Honor of Alan V Deardorff, chapter 17, pages 183-195, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    13. Holger Görg & Richard Kneller & Balázs Muraközy, 2012. "What makes a successful export? Evidence from firm-product-level data," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 45(4), pages 1332-1368, November.
    14. Kohler Wilhelm & Jung Benjamin, 2017. "Wie vorteilhaft ist internationaler Handel?: Ein neuer Ansatz zur Vermessung der Gewinne," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 32-55, April.
    15. Daniel Bernhofen, 2010. "The Empirics of General Equilibrium Tade Theory: What Have we Learned?," CESifo Working Paper Series 3242, CESifo.
    16. James R. Melvin, 1995. "A Simple Heckscher-Ohlin Synthesis of Trade, Investment, Factor Flows and Transfers," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 131(III), pages 343-359, September.
    17. Daniel Bernhofen, 2009. "Predicting the pattern of international trade in the neoclassical model: a synthesis," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 41(1), pages 5-21, October.
    18. Chau, Nancy H. & Färe, Rolf, 2011. "Shadow pricing market access: A trade benefit function approach," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 146(4), pages 1631-1663, July.
    19. Pelli, Martino & Tschopp, Jeanne, 2017. "Comparative advantage, capital destruction, and hurricanes," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 315-337.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eut:journl:v:13:y:2008:i:2:p:113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: [z.rahimalipour] (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fecutir.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.