IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviy2023i4p973-987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digitizing Public Institutions on the Example of the National Water and Electricity Company (NAWEC) of Gambia

Author

Listed:
  • Jim Secka
  • Joanna Wisniewska
  • Ibrahim Ismailov

Abstract

Purpose: The study seeks to examine the barriers and drivers of digitization in a typical public organization, with promising potentials to improve service performance in Gambian public sector notably utilities. Design/Methodology/Approach: Qualitative research method is used to analyze the case relying both on primary and secondary source of data. A literature review was conducted to understand factors that influence digitization in public institution. Due to its scientific relevance, the secondary sources used mainly came from scientific journals. Staff of the institution were also engaged in retrieving firsthand data as to key drivers and barriers of digitalization in NAWEC. Findings: The findings show that National Water and Electricity Company is constraint with numerous challenges in its digitalization ques. The challenges are handful, but the following stand out, inadequate finance, inadequate skills(digital) personnel, and lack of modern digital tools and equipment. Key to the drivers found include management such as the decision-making structure of the organization, technology, and digitalization interest of customers. Practical Implications: To support digitization, NAWEC must quickly adopt new processes, adopt agile and operational methods, and new organizational structures. In a nutshell, digitization in the public sector has emerged to rethink existing processes and services and create better user experiences for citizens and businesses, which are at the heart of these efforts. Originality/Value: To support digitization, NAWEC must quickly adopt new processes, adopt agile and operational methods, and new organizational structures. In a nutshell, digitization in the public sector has emerged to rethink existing processes and services and create better user experiences for citizens and businesses, which are at the heart of these efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Jim Secka & Joanna Wisniewska & Ibrahim Ismailov, 2023. "Digitizing Public Institutions on the Example of the National Water and Electricity Company (NAWEC) of Gambia," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 973-987.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvi:y:2023:i:4:p:973-987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3340/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ashaye, Olusoyi Richard & Irani, Zahir, 2019. "The role of stakeholders in the effective use of e-government resources in public services," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 253-270.
    2. Murray Scott & William DeLone & William Golden, 2016. "Measuring eGovernment success: a public value approach," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 187-208, May.
    3. Bernd W. Wirtz & Paul F. Langer, 2017. "Public Multichannel Management – an Integrated Framework of Off- and Online Multichannel Government Services," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 563-580, December.
    4. Andrew M. Pettigrew, 1987. "Context And Action In The Transformation Of The Firm," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 649-670, November.
    5. Weerakkody, Vishanth & El-Haddadeh, Ramzi & Sivarajah, Uthayasankar & Omar, Amizan & Molnar, Andreea, 2019. "A case analysis of E-government service delivery through a service chain dimension," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 233-238.
    6. Diana-Mihaela Pociovalisteanu & Eleftherios Thalassinos & Aurelian Tirca & Walter Leal Filho, 2010. "Trends and challenges in the energy sector of Romania in the post-accession to the European Union," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 3-15.
    7. Che-Chuan Hsu & Rua-Huan Tsaih & David C. Yen, 2018. "The Evolving Role of IT Departments in Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hélène Laurell & Leona Achtenhagen & Svante Andersson, 2017. "The changing role of network ties and critical capabilities in an international new venture’s early development," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 113-140, March.
    2. Midgley, Gerald & Cavana, Robert Y. & Brocklesby, John & Foote, Jeff L. & Wood, David R.R. & Ahuriri-Driscoll, Annabel, 2013. "Towards a new framework for evaluating systemic problem structuring methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(1), pages 143-154.
    3. Timothy N. Carroll & Thomas J. Gormley & Vincent J. Bilardo & Richard M. Burton & Keith L. Woodman, 2006. "Designing a New Organization at NASA: An Organization Design Process Using Simulation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 202-214, April.
    4. Thillai Rajan, A. & Anand Ram, V., 2000. "Towards developing a processual understanding of power sector restructuring: the case of Orissa State Electricity Board," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 93-105, September.
    5. Anna Romiti & Mario Vecchio & Chiara Milani & Gino Sartor, 2023. "Italian healthcare organizations facing new dimensions: changes in governance structure," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(3), pages 893-921, September.
    6. Hamza Cherkaoui Rhazouani & Jihane Chouay & Hassan El Aissaoui & Hamid Ait Lemqeddem, 2023. "Digitalisation et le Nouveau Management Public," Post-Print hal-04246269, HAL.
    7. Grigory Viktorovich Prytkov & Natalia Yurievna Tsvetus & Artem Alexandrovich Balyakin & Andrey Sergeevich Malyshev & Sergey Borisovich Taranenko, 2017. "Scientific Cooperation between Russia and the EU in the Development and Use of Large Research Infrastructure," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 338-353.
    8. Claude Paraponaris, 2009. "La diffusion des connaissances au sein des multinationales par le développement des relations locales," Post-Print halshs-04124617, HAL.
    9. S. Weaver & Pam Ellen & Lars Mathiassen, 2015. "Contextualist Inquiry into Organizational Citizenship: Promoting Recycling Across Heterogeneous Organizational Actors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 413-428, June.
    10. Olga Bergal, 2020. "Innovative Energy Clusters' Infrastructure," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(Special 1), pages 361-376.
    11. Nutt, Paul C., 2005. "Search during decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(3), pages 851-876, February.
    12. Eleni ARAVOPOULOU, 2015. "Zmiana Organizacyjna – Przegląd Teorii I Koncepcji," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 1, pages 19-32.
    13. Anis Chariri & Indira Januarti, 2017. "Audit Committee Characteristics and Integrated Reporting:Empirical Study of Companies Listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 305-318.
    14. Yang Liu & Moses Olabhele Esangbedo & Sijun Bai, 2019. "Adaptability of Inter-Organizational Information Systems Based on Organizational Identity: Some Factors of Partnership for the Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Corrado Cuccurullo & Federico Lega, 2013. "Effective strategizing practices in pluralistic settings: the case of Academic Medical Centers," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(3), pages 609-629, August.
    16. Cayer, Mario & Minkler, Lanse, 1998. "Dualism, dialogue and organizations: Reflections on organizational transformation and labor-managed firms," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 53-77.
    17. Nurlina & T. Muhyiddin & Kgs & M. Sobri & Yunisvita & Liliana & Muhammad Farhan, 2017. "Fertility, Urbanization and Underemployment," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 600-608.
    18. Edoardo Ongaro & Ting Gong & Yijia Jing, 2021. "Public administration, context and innovation: A framework of analysis," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(1), pages 4-11, February.
    19. Isabella Damdinovna Elyakova & Aleksandr Andreyevich Khristoforov & Aleksandr Lvovich Elyakov & Larisa Ivanovna Danilova & Tamara Aleksandrovna Karataeva & Elena Vladimirovna Danilova, 2017. "Forecast Scenarios of World Prices for Natural Gas," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4A), pages 284-297.
    20. Sylvain Mondon, 2019. "Transformations organisationnelles, développement durable et temporalités d'action, un cas d'adaptation au changement climatique," Post-Print halshs-02967382, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Digitization; digital transformation; public sector; digitization barriers; digitization drivers; digital government; and organizational change management.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • O43 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Institutions and Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvi:y:2023:i:4:p:973-987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.