IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i4p333-341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Notional Interest Deduction – Impact on the Cost of Equity in Investment Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Urszula Romaniuk
  • Krzysztof Malik

Abstract

Purpose: The Notional Interest Deduction (NID) was introduced to achieve equal treatment of debt and equity financing by granting an additional tax deduction from self-financing. Our purpose was to analyze the practical meaning of the introduced mechanism as a factor of the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) calculation and evaluation of the efficiency of development projects. In the art, the WACC is used to determine the rates of discount for the calculation of future cash flows (CF) and net present value (NPV) of investment projects. Design/Methodology/Approach: The NID mechanism is recognized as the Allowance for Economic Growth (ACE) and the countries benefiting from this relief are recognized as applying the ACE regime. The individual ACE regime is monitored and evaluated for compliance with the European Code of the Conduct Group for business taxation. The documents published by the Council of the European Union became the basis for the tax shield rate analyses and assessment of the impact of NID on WACC changes. Findings: It has been shown that the benefits of NID mechanism can correct Weighted Average Cost of Capital in minus and the differences between countries result from the ACE regime model used, the method of calculating the qualified base and the method of determining the reference rate for the calculation of the notional interest deduction. Practical Implications: The presented use of the notional interest deduction mechanism will fill the gap in the literature on the subject and indicate new opportunities to study the efficiency of the development of organizations. The results can also help practitioners to identify a mechanism whose use may be beneficial to the company due to the possibility of a more precise assessment of the efficiency of the investment project. Originality and Value: The NID mechanism is relatively new and the issues related to it have not yet received much analysis, in particular in connection with non-tax benefits. Meanwhile, taking into account the effects of ACE regime in discounting cash flows may affect the decision to implement or reject an investment project.

Suggested Citation

  • Urszula Romaniuk & Krzysztof Malik, 2021. "Notional Interest Deduction – Impact on the Cost of Equity in Investment Projects," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 333-341.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4:p:333-341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/2591/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chichilnisky, Graciela & Heal, Geoffrey & Beltratti, Andrea, 1995. "The Green Golden Rule," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 175-179, August.
    2. Geert Campenhout & Tom Caneghem, 2013. "How did the notional interest deduction affect Belgian SMEs’ capital structure?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 351-373, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gundert, Hannah & Nicolay, Katharina & Steinbrenner, Daniela & Wickel, Sophia, 2023. "The tax attractiveness of EU locations for corporate investments: A stocktaking of past developments and recent reforms," ZEW Discussion Papers 23-066, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barkley Rosser, J. Jr., 2001. "Complex ecologic-economic dynamics and environmental policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 23-37, April.
    2. W. J. Wouter Botzen & Jeroen C. J. M. Van Den Bergh & Graciela Chichilnisky, 2018. "Climate Policy Without Intertemporal Dictatorship: Chichilnisky Criterion Versus Classical Utilitarianism In Dice," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(02), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Jozef Konings & Catherine Lecocq & Bruno Merlevede, 2022. "Does a tax deduction scheme matter for jobs and investment by multinational and domestic enterprises?," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(4), pages 1966-1989, November.
    4. Mariani, Fabio & Pérez-Barahona, Agustín & Raffin, Natacha, 2010. "Life expectancy and the environment," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 798-815, April.
    5. Geoffrey Heal, 2008. "Climate Economics: A Meta-Review and Some Suggestions," NBER Working Papers 13927, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Guillouet, Louise & Martimort, David, 2023. "Acting in the Darkness: Towards some Foundations for the Precautionary Principle," TSE Working Papers 23-1411, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised 05 Jan 2024.
    7. Konings, Jozef & Lecocq, Cathy & Merlevede, Bruno, 2018. "Does a Tax Credit matter for Job Creation by Multinational Enterprises?," CEPR Discussion Papers 13105, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Ngo Long & Vincent Martinet, 2018. "Combining rights and welfarism: a new approach to intertemporal evaluation of social alternatives," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 50(1), pages 35-64, January.
    9. Attílio, Luccas Assis & Faria, João Ricardo & Rodrigues, Mauro, 2023. "Does monetary policy impact CO2 emissions? A GVAR analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Chichilnisky, Graciela & Heal, Geoffrey, 1995. "Markets with tradable CO2 emission quotas: principles and practice," MPRA Paper 8486, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Jean-Charles Hourcade & Philippe Ambrosi & Patrice Dumas, 2009. "Beyond the Stern Review: Lessons from a risky venture at the limits of the cost–benefit analysis," Post-Print hal-00716769, HAL.
    12. Ropars-Collet, Carole, 2012. "Nuisible ou gibier? Une analyse économique de la chasse des grands animaux en France," Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, Editions NecPlus, vol. 92(02), pages 161-181, October.
    13. V.Martinet & L. Doyen, 2003. "Sustainable management of an exhaustible resource:a viable control model," THEMA Working Papers 2003-36, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    14. Martinet, Vincent & Rotillon, Gilles, 2007. "Invariance in growth theory and sustainable development," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 2827-2846, August.
    15. Verchère, Alban, 2011. "Le développement durable en question : analyses économiques autour d’un improbable compromis entre acceptions optimiste et pessimiste du rapport de l’Homme à la Nature," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 87(3), pages 337-403, septembre.
    16. Nicola Branzoli & Antonella Caiumi, 2020. "How effective is an incremental ACE in addressing the debt bias? Evidence from corporate tax returns," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 27(6), pages 1485-1519, December.
    17. Graciela Chichilnisky, 2012. "Economic theory and the global environment," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 49(2), pages 217-225, February.
    18. Mustafa Akan, 2016. "Sustainability, Consumption, And Technology," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 5(2), pages 9-25.
    19. Torre, Davide La & Liuzzi, Danilo & Marsiglio, Simone, 2021. "Transboundary pollution externalities: Think globally, act locally?," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    20. Faria, João Ricardo & McAdam, Peter, 2018. "The green golden rule: Habit and anticipation of future consumption," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 131-133.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Notional Interest Deduction (NID); Allowance for Corporate Equity (ACE); cost of equity; tax shield; Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC); investment projects.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4:p:333-341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.