IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxiiiy2020i2p741-762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Climate as a Mediating Factor Between Occupational Stress and Prosocial Organizational Behaviours in Knowledge-Based Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Karolina Oleksa-Marewska

Abstract

Purpose: The present article aims to analyse the relationship between the stress experienced by the employees of knowledge-based organizations and the desire to demonstrate prosocial organizational behaviours, which are fundamental for knowledge sharing, as well as to examine the mediating effect of the organizational climate on that relationship. Design/methodology/approach: An empirical, quantitative study was conducted among a sizable sample of knowledge workers (N=677) employed in over 150 knowledge-based organizations operating in Poland, which is the country with a strong knowledge-based economy. Two psychometric questionnaires and one author’s own questionnaire were used. To verify the hypotheses, multiple linear regression and mediation with bootstrapping analyses were conducted. Findings: The results of statistical analyses demonstrated that there is a negative correlation between the level of occupational stress and engagement in prosocial behaviours. Also, this relationship is fully mediated by an assessment of the organizational climate, especially the quality of communication, relations with colleagues and work organization. Practical implications: The research results provide pragmatic guidelines for management practices in knowledge-based organizations, ones that may contribute to increasing prosocial organizational behaviours as a basis for information and knowledge exchange in the knowledge-based economy. It is particularly important to ensure the reduction of stress level; it is also vital to improve communication and relations between personnel and to make the organization and control of work more flexible. Originality/value: This research significantly expands the literature on prosocial organizational behaviours, organizational climate and occupational stress, which is of a great importance in the knowledge-based economy. Moreover, the results show that, despite other research, there are organizational factors more significant than management style and approach, which are crucial for performing prosocial organizational behaviours.

Suggested Citation

  • Karolina Oleksa-Marewska, 2020. "Organizational Climate as a Mediating Factor Between Occupational Stress and Prosocial Organizational Behaviours in Knowledge-Based Organizations," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 741-762.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:2:p:741-762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/1619/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Occupational stress; organizational climate; prosocial organizational behaviours; knowledge workers; knowledge-based organizations; knowledge-based economy.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • L20 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - General
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • M54 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Labor Management
    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
    • P46 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Consumer Economics; Health; Education and Training; Welfare, Income, Wealth, and Poverty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:2:p:741-762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.