IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/qrampp/v5y2008i1p48-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Academics as professionals or managers? A textual analysis of interview data

Author

Listed:
  • John Chandler

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to explore the themes of professionalism and managerialism in how academics in England talk about their work in universities today. The aim is to examine how academics represent their work and to identify what kind of identifications they make in the process. In doing so, it is hoped to shed some light on how academics can position themselves in relation to managerialism in the English academy, while also exploring the value of a particular methodological approach to doing so. Design/methodology/approach - The paper employs Fairclough's approach to textual analysis in analysing extracts from interview data as part of a critical discourse analysis of the work of academics in universities in England at a particular time. Findings - The paper suggests that individual academics in middle ranking positions do not identify in a straightforward way either with managerialism or professionalism. Instead they perform ambiguous, ambivalent, complex and fluid positionings of the self in relation to the themes of managerialism and professionalism. Originality/value - The paper demonstrates that the use of Fairclough's approach to textual analysis can provide a rich picture of individual social positionings from relatively short extracts of interview data.

Suggested Citation

  • John Chandler, 2008. "Academics as professionals or managers? A textual analysis of interview data," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(1), pages 48-63, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:qrampp:v:5:y:2008:i:1:p:48-63
    DOI: 10.1108/11766090810856778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/11766090810856778/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/11766090810856778/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/11766090810856778?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jim Barry & John Chandler & Heather Clark, 2001. "Between the Ivory Tower and the Academic Assembly Line," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 88-101, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Kalgin & Olga Kalgina & Anna Lebedeva, 2019. "Publication Metrics as a Tool for Measuring Research Productivity and Their Relation to Motivation," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 44-86.
    2. Hayes, Tom, 2007. "Delphi study of the future of marketing of higher education," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(9), pages 927-931, September.
    3. Benson Honig & Joseph Lampel & Donald Siegel & Paul Drnevich, 2014. "Ethics in the Production and Dissemination of Management Research: Institutional Failure or Individual Fallibility?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 118-142, January.
    4. Norrin Halilem & Nabil Amara & Réjean Landry, 2011. "Is the academic Ivory Tower becoming a managed structure? A nested analysis of the variance in activities of researchers from natural sciences and engineering in Canada," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(2), pages 431-448, February.
    5. Russell Craig & Joel Amernic, 2002. "Accountability of accounting educators and the rhythm of the university: resistance strategies for postmodern blues," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 121-171.
    6. Калгин А. С. & Калгина О. В. & Лебедева А. А., 2019. "Оценка Публикационной Активности Как Способ Измерения Результативности Труда Ученых И Ее Связь С Мотивацией," Вопросы образования // Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 44-86.
    7. Joseph Lampel, 2011. "Torn Between Admiration and Distrust: European Strategy Research and the American Challenge," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1655-1662, December.
    8. Guta, Adrian & Nixon, Stephanie A. & Wilson, Michael G., 2013. "Resisting the seduction of “ethics creep”: Using Foucault to surface complexity and contradiction in research ethics review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 301-310.
    9. Narissara Sujchaphong & Bang Nguyen & T. C. Melewar & Pakorn Sujchaphong & Junsong Chen, 2020. "A framework of brand-centred training and development activities, transformational leadership and employee brand support in higher education," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 143-159, March.
    10. Bethuel Sibongiseni Ngcamu, 2013. "The Empirical Analysis of Performance Management System : A Case Study of a University in South Africa," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 5(5), pages 316-324.
    11. Elena Gori & Silvia Fissi & Michele Fiuman?, 2018. "Social Network e Stakeholder Engagement, un binomio tutto da sviluppare? Un confronto tra le universit? pubbliche di Italia e Cina," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 95-116.
    12. Jon Olaskoaga-Larrauri & Juan José Mijangos-Del-Campo & Xabier González-Laskibar & Eneritz Onaindia-Gerrikabeitia, 2022. "Different Preferences or Opposite Directions? Reforms and Job Satisfaction at Public and Private Universities in Spain," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:qrampp:v:5:y:2008:i:1:p:48-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.