IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/mrrpps/v34y2011i7p754-772.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation of ocean container carrier selection criteria: an Indian shipper's perspective

Author

Listed:
  • V. Kannan
  • S.K. Bose
  • N.G. Kannan

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to assist ocean container carriers in devising effective marketing strategies to attract and retain Indian shippers by letting them understand the list of criteria Indian shippers use in the carrier selection decisions and also the amount of importance they assign to each criterion during such decisions. Design/methodology/approach - To explore the criteria, review of transportation literature, customer satisfaction survey questionnaires of container carriers and SERVQUAL battery was undertaken. Telephonic interviews and focus group interview were also conducted for this purpose. In order to evaluate the criteria, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used. In the AHP, the pairwise comparisons were carried out by another focus group with the help of a questionnaire. For AHP calculations, the Expert Choice 11.5 software was used. Findings - Indian shippers use 45 criteria in the container carrier selection process and out of these, low freight is ranked as the most important criterion and pricing flexibility is the second most important one. In the list, these are the only two criteria found to be with more than 10 per cent importance. The least importance is given to five criteria: gifts and compliments, online booking, physical facilities, professional appearance and trade announcements which are weighed with 0.10 per cent importance. The paper has explored and added several new carrier selection criteria to the existing transportation literature. Practical implications - The paper enables container carriers to understand various criteria Indian shippers use in the container carrier selection decisions along with their relative importance in such decisions. It also helps container carriers to decide which criterion is to be given priority and which not while devising their marketing strategies for Indian market. This decision is vital to maximize shippers' satisfaction. Originality/value - The paper is the first ever carrier selection study undertaken in India and is expected to open up enormous scope for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Kannan & S.K. Bose & N.G. Kannan, 2011. "An evaluation of ocean container carrier selection criteria: an Indian shipper's perspective," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(7), pages 754-772, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:v:34:y:2011:i:7:p:754-772
    DOI: 10.1108/01409171111146661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01409171111146661/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01409171111146661/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/01409171111146661?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Srđan Ljubojević & Dragan Pamučar & Dragutin Jovanović & Vujadin Vešović, 2019. "Outsourcing transport service: a fuzzy multi-criteria methodology for provider selection based on comparison of the real and ideal parameters of providers," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 399-433, June.
    2. Kuo, Szu-Yu & Lin, Pei-Chun & Lu, Chin-Shan, 2017. "The effects of dynamic capabilities, service capabilities, competitive advantage, and organizational performance in container shipping," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 356-371.
    3. Balci, Gökcay & Cetin, Ismail Bilge & Tanyeri, Mustafa, 2018. "Differentiation of container shipping services in Turkey," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 26-35.
    4. Chieh-Hua Wen & Wei-Wei Lin, 2016. "Customer segmentation of freight forwarders and impacts on the competitive positioning of ocean carriers in the Taiwan--southern China trade lane," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 420-435, May.
    5. Peng, Zixuan & Shan, Wenxuan & Guan, Feng & Yu, Bin, 2016. "Stable vessel-cargo matching in dry bulk shipping market with price game mechanism," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 76-94.
    6. Kum Fai Yuen & Vinh V. Thai, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility and service quality provision in shipping firms: financial synergies or trade-offs?," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 131-146, January.
    7. Michael J. Maloni & David M. Gligor & Ioannis N. Lagoudis, 2016. "Linking ocean container carrier capabilities to shipper–carrier relationships: a case study," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 959-975, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:v:34:y:2011:i:7:p:754-772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.