IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/arjpps/arj-07-2016-0090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate boards, monitoring and securities class actions: a pitch

Author

Listed:
  • Victoria J. Clout

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to applyFaff’s (2015)pitch template to a regulatory financial accounting research topic. The author describes her personal reflections on completing the pitch template for this project by investigating corporate boards, monitoring and securities class actions (SCAs) in Australia. The author builds on prior research in this area(Chappleet al., 2014). This study is set within prior literature examining capital markets, corporate governance, continuous disclosure regime and regulatory changes. The market reaction to corporate board changes pre- and post-SCAs is the focus of the examination within the pitch template. The pitch letter contributes to prior literature, as it demonstrates a team with established researchers using the pitch template, while prior papers have documented PhD student usage of the pitch template. Design/methodology/approach - The author uses theFaff (2015)pitch template to focus the research team’s ideas into a concisely focused research idea. An earlier version of this pitch was presented at the Centre for International Finance and Regulation Pitching Research Symposium on 29 May 2015 in Sydney to a panel of distinguished professors and participants from market regulators including the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Reserve Bank of Australia, Australian Prudential Regulation Authority and the financial sector including Colonial First State. Findings - It was found that there are benefits to using the pitch template for both established and emerging researchers. Prior pitch papers have primarily been authored by PhD students. This paper’s aim was to provide evidence that established as well as emerging scholars can benefit from completing the Faff pitch template. Originality/value - This pitch letter contributes to the research community, as it shows the process and personal reflections on undertaking the pitch exercise by a team including established and emerging researchers. Within this pitch letter there is a documentation of how the research team for the underlying project was formed and the prior experiences of the team.

Suggested Citation

  • Victoria J. Clout, 2017. "Corporate boards, monitoring and securities class actions: a pitch," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(3), pages 242-248, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:arjpps:arj-07-2016-0090
    DOI: 10.1108/ARJ-07-2016-0090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ARJ-07-2016-0090/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ARJ-07-2016-0090/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/ARJ-07-2016-0090?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victoria J. Clout & Roger Willett & Tom Smith, 2016. "Analysing the market–book value relation in large Australian and US firms: implications for fundamental analysis and the market–book ratio," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 56(4), pages 1017-1040, December.
    2. Robert W. Faff & Tom Smith, 2015. "A simple template for pitching research," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 55(2), pages 311-336, June.
    3. Victoria J. Clout & Larelle Chapple & Nilan Gandhi, 2013. "The impact of auditor independence regulations on established and emerging firms," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(2), pages 88-108, September.
    4. Larelle Chapple & Victoria J Clout & David Tan, 2014. "Corporate governance and securities class actions," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 39(4), pages 525-547, November.
    5. Luisa Ana Unda & Tom Smith, 2015. "Board of directors characteristics and credit union financial performance: a pitch," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 55(2), pages 353-360, June.
    6. Humphery-Jenner, Mark L., 2012. "Internal and external discipline following securities class actions," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 151-179.
    7. David T. Tan & Larelle Chapple & Kathleen D. Walsh, 2017. "Corporate fraud culture: Re-examining the corporate governance and performance relation," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(2), pages 597-620, June.
    8. Ferris, Stephen P. & Jandik, Tomas & Lawless, Robert M. & Makhija, Anil, 2007. "Derivative Lawsuits as a Corporate Governance Mechanism: Empirical Evidence on Board Changes Surrounding Filings," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(1), pages 143-165, March.
    9. Stacey J. Beaumont & Tom Smith, 2015. "An investigation of the short- and long-run relations between executive cash bonus payments and firm financial performance: a pitch," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 55(2), pages 337-343, June.
    10. Grace Chia‐Man Hsu, 2009. "Impact of earnings performance on price‐sensitive disclosures under the Australian continuous disclosure regime," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 49(2), pages 317-339, June.
    11. Larelle Chapple & Thu Phuong Truong & Steven Cahan, 2015. "Continuous disclosure compliance: does corporate governance matter?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 55(4), pages 965-988, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stewart Jones & Nurul Alam, 2019. "A machine learning analysis of citation impact among selected Pacific Basin journals," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(4), pages 2509-2552, December.
    2. Millicent Chang & Andrew B. Jackson & Marvin Wee, 2018. "A review of research on regulation changes in the Asia‐Pacific region," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(3), pages 635-667, September.
    3. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Chen, Xiaoyan & Ling, Xin & Smith, Tom & Zhu, Yushu, 2016. "Emerging trends in Asia-Pacific finance research: A review of recent influential publications and a research agenda," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 66-76.
    4. Lucia Dalla Pellegrina & Margherita Saraceno, 2016. "Can Shareholder Litigation Discipline CEO Bonuses in the Financial Sector? The Role of Securities Class Actions," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 45(1), pages 3-36, February.
    5. Sumit Lodhia, 2019. "What about your qualitative cousins? Adapting the pitching template to qualitative research," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(1), pages 309-329, March.
    6. Lin, Hsien-Ping & Walker, M. Mark & Wang, Yung-Jang, 2020. "Shareholder wealth effects of corporate fraud: Evidence from Taiwan’s securities investor and futures trader protection act," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 222-243.
    7. Unsal, Omer & Kabir Hassan, M. & Zirek, Duygu, 2017. "Corporate lobbying and labor relations: Evidence from employee-level litigations," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 411-441.
    8. Larelle Chapple & Victoria J Clout & David Tan, 2014. "Corporate governance and securities class actions," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 39(4), pages 525-547, November.
    9. Laure de Batz & Evžen Kočenda & Evžen Kocenda, 2023. "Financial Crime and Punishment: A Meta-Analysis," CESifo Working Paper Series 10528, CESifo.
    10. Crutchley, Claire E. & Minnick, Kristina & Schorno, Patrick J., 2015. "When governance fails: Naming directors in class action lawsuits," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 81-96.
    11. Omer Unsal & Blake Rayfield, 2020. "Corporate governance and employee treatment: evidence from takeover defenses," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 44(2), pages 361-391, April.
    12. Arena, Matteo P. & Wang, Bin & Yang, Rong, 2021. "Securities litigation and corporate tax avoidance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    13. Jinghui Sun & Pamela Kent & Baolei Qi & Jiwei Wang, 2019. "Chief financial officer demographic characteristics and fraudulent financial reporting in China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(4), pages 2705-2734, December.
    14. Aharony, Joseph & Liu, Chelsea & Yawson, Alfred, 2015. "Corporate litigation and executive turnover," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 268-292.
    15. Xiaomeng Charlene Chen & Ka Wai Choi & Sue Wright & Hai Wu, 2023. "The effectiveness of sanctions on disclosure regulation: Australian evidence," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 3841-3872, December.
    16. Liu, Ruiming & Si, Haiping & Miao, Miao, 2022. "One false step can make a great difference: Does corporate litigation cause the exit of the controlling shareholder?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    17. Pornsit Jiraporn & Pandej Chintrakarn & Shenghui Tong & Sirimon Treepongkaruna, 2018. "Does board independence substitute for external audit quality? Evidence from an exogenous regulatory shock," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(1), pages 27-41, February.
    18. Joseph Simpson & Ana Marcie Sariol, 2019. "Squared Away: Veterans on the Board of Directors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 1035-1045, December.
    19. Chung, Chune Young & Kim, Incheol & Rabarison, Monika K. & To, Thomas Y. & Wu, Eliza, 2020. "Shareholder litigation rights and corporate acquisitions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    20. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Chen, Xiaoyan & Ling, Xin & Smith, Tom & Zhu, Yushu, 2017. "Research in finance: A review of influential publications and a research agenda," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 188-199.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:arjpps:arj-07-2016-0090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.