IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v4y1997i2p115-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The potential scope for the application of pollution permits to reducing car ownership in the UK : Some preliminary thoughts

Author

Listed:
  • Walton, William

Abstract

The application of the National Traffic Growth Forecasts published in 1989 to concurrently published vehicle ownership figures produces a projected total of a possible 35 million vehicles on the UK's roads by the year 2025. This projection, compounded by strong evidence of increasing vehicle usage, implies increased levels of congestion and, in all probability, increasing levels of greenhouse gas emissions. Despite this prognosis the Government has fallen a long way short of committing itself to strong traffic management policies, such as the introduction of road pricing and significant increases in fuel duties. Whilst acknowledging the potential role of such measures, this paper seeks to consider whether the concept of tradable pollution permits, which, increasingly, are being used in the USA to limit emissions from fixed points, can have any application to reducing levels of car ownership, and hence congestion and pollution. It suggests that car licence tax discs, obtained through the payment of Vehicle Excise Duty, should be limited in number and auctioned on the free market, with the total number in circulation being reduced on a continual basis. The monies raised from these auctions would be recycled for investment in public transport in order to reduce the inevitable hardship that would result from people being denied access to car ownership. It is concluded that, whilst such an initiative would be politically unpopular, it would necessarily succeed in halting the upward spiral of car ownership, congestion and pollution, and would, given the appropriate political response, act as a strong imperative for governments to refocus their policies on public transport.

Suggested Citation

  • Walton, William, 1997. "The potential scope for the application of pollution permits to reducing car ownership in the UK : Some preliminary thoughts," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 115-122, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:4:y:1997:i:2:p:115-122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967-070X(97)00002-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Owens, Susan, 1995. "From 'predict and provide' to 'predict and prevent'?: Pricing and planning in transport policy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 43-49, January.
    2. O Fromm & B Hansjürgens, 1996. "Emission Trading in Theory and Practice: An Analysis of RECLAIM in Southern California," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 14(3), pages 367-384, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Charles Raux, 2009. "Umweltzertifikate im Verkehrsbereich," Post-Print halshs-01735915, HAL.
    2. Charles Raux, 2011. "Downstream Emissions Trading for Transport," Transportation Research, Economics and Policy, in: Werner Rothengatter & Yoshitsugu Hayashi & Wolfgang Schade (ed.), Transport Moving to Climate Intelligence, chapter 0, pages 209-226, Springer.
    3. Raux, Charles & Marlot, Grégoire, 2005. "A system of tradable CO2 permits applied to fuel consumption by motorists," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 255-265, May.
    4. Xu, Meng & Grant-Muller, Susan, 2016. "Trip mode and travel pattern impacts of a Tradable Credits Scheme: A case study of Beijing," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 72-83.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tornberg, Patrik & Odhage, John, 2018. "Making transport planning more collaborative? The case of Strategic Choice of Measures in Swedish transport planning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 416-429.
    2. Tapio, Petri, 2005. "Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 137-151, March.
    3. Tennøy, Aud, 2010. "Why we fail to reduce urban road traffic volumes: Does it matter how planners frame the problem?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 216-223, August.
    4. Harriet Bulkeley & Tim Rayner, 2003. "New Realism and Local Realities: Local Transport Planning in Leicester and Cambridgeshire," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 35-55, January.
    5. Simon Quemin & Christian Perthuis, 2019. "Transitional Restricted Linkage Between Emissions Trading Schemes," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(1), pages 1-32, September.
    6. te Brömmelstroet, Marco & Skou Nicolaisen, Morten & Büttner, Benjamin & Ferreira, Antonio, 2017. "Experiences with transportation models: An international survey of planning practices," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 10-18.
    7. Lowry, Michael B., 2010. "Using optimization to program projects in the era of communicative rationality," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 94-101, March.
    8. Nostikasari, Dian, 2015. "Representations of everyday travel experiences: Case study of the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan Area," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 96-107.
    9. Patsy Healey, 1999. "Sites, Jobs and Portfolios: Economic Development Discourses in the Planning System," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(1), pages 27-42, January.
    10. Lehmann, Paul, 2008. "Using a policy mix for pollution control: A review of economic literature," UFZ Discussion Papers 4/2008, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    11. Cadena Gaitan, Carlos, 2012. "Political determinants of sustainable transport in Latin American cities," MERIT Working Papers 2012-072, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    12. Miller, Harvey J., 2013. "Beyond sharing: cultivating cooperative transportation systems through geographic information science," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 296-308.
    13. Willems, Jannes J., 2018. "Beyond maintenance: Emerging discourses on waterway renewal in the Netherlands," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1-12.
    14. Blainey, Simon P. & Preston, John M., 2019. "Predict or prophesy? Issues and trade-offs in modelling long-term transport infrastructure demand and capacity," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 165-173.
    15. Arsenio, Elisabete & Martens, Karel & Di Ciommo, Floridea, 2016. "Sustainable urban mobility plans: Bridging climate change and equity targets?," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 30-39.
    16. Hansson, Lisa, 2020. "Visual representation in urban transport planning: Where have all the cars gone?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1-11.
    17. Simon Marvin & Simon Guy, 1997. "Infrastructure Provision, Development Processes and the Co-production of Environmental Value," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(12), pages 2023-2036, December.
    18. Busscher, Tim & Tillema, Taede & Arts, Jos, 2015. "In search of sustainable road infrastructure planning: How can we build on historical policy shifts?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 42-51.
    19. Brockmann, Karl Ludwig & Koschel, Henrike & Schmidt, Tobias F. N., 1998. "Tradable SO-2-permits in the European Union: a practicable scheme for public utilities," ZEW Discussion Papers 98-15, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    20. Geels, Frank W., 2012. "A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 471-482.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:4:y:1997:i:2:p:115-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.