IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v175y2023ics1366554523001400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AIS data-driven ship trajectory prediction modelling and analysis based on machine learning and deep learning methods

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Huanhuan
  • Jiao, Hang
  • Yang, Zaili

Abstract

Maritime transport faces new safety challenges in an increasingly complex traffic environment caused by large-scale and high-speed ships, particularly with the introduction of intelligent and autonomous ships. It is evident that Automatic Identification System (AIS) data-driven ship trajectory prediction can effectively aid in identifying abnormal ship behaviours and reducing maritime risks such as collision, stranding, and contact. Furthermore, trajectory prediction is widely recognised as one of the critical technologies for realising safe autonomous navigation. The prediction methods and their performance are the key factors for future safe and automatic shipping. Currently, ship trajectory prediction lacks the real performance measurement and analysis of different algorithms, including classical machine learning and emerging deep learning methods. This paper aims to systematically analyse the performance of ship trajectory prediction methods and pioneer experimental tests to reveal their advantages and disadvantages as well as fitness in different scenarios involving complicated systems. To do so, five machine learning methods (i.e., Kalman Filter (KF), Support Vector Progression (SVR), Back Propagation network (BP), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), and Random Forest (RF)) and seven deep learning methods (i.e., Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gate Recurrent Unit (GRU), Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory (Bi-LSTM), Sequence to Sequence (Seq2seq), Bi-directional Gate Recurrent Unit (Bi-GRU), and Transformer) are first extracted from the state-of-the-art literature review and then employed to implement the trajectory prediction and compare their prediction performance in the real world. Three AIS datasets are collected from the waters of representative traffic features, including a normal channel (i.e., the Chengshan Jiao Promontory), complex traffic (i.e., the Zhoushan Archipelago), and a port area (i.e., Caofeidian port). They are selected to test and analyse the performance of all twelve methods based on six evaluation indexes and explore the characteristics and effectiveness of the twelve trajectory prediction methods in detail. The experimental results provide a novel perspective, comparison, and benchmark for ship trajectory prediction research, which not only demonstrates the fitness of each method in different maritime traffic scenarios, but also makes significant contributions to maritime safety and autonomous shipping development.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Huanhuan & Jiao, Hang & Yang, Zaili, 2023. "AIS data-driven ship trajectory prediction modelling and analysis based on machine learning and deep learning methods," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:175:y:2023:i:c:s1366554523001400
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2023.103152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554523001400
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103152?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Simona Raboaca & Catalin Dumitrescu & Ioana Manta, 2020. "Aircraft Trajectory Tracking Using Radar Equipment with Fuzzy Logic Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Bai, Xiwen & Hou, Yao & Yang, Dong, 2021. "Choose clean energy or green technology? Empirical evidence from global ships," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    3. Gao, Dawei & Zhu, Yongsheng & Guedes Soares, C., 2023. "Uncertainty modelling and dynamic risk assessment for long-sequence AIS trajectory based on multivariate Gaussian Process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    4. Zhang, Mingyang & Kujala, Pentti & Hirdaris, Spyros, 2022. "A machine learning method for the evaluation of ship grounding risk in real operational conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    5. Yan, Yimo & Chow, Andy H.F. & Ho, Chin Pang & Kuo, Yong-Hong & Wu, Qihao & Ying, Chengshuo, 2022. "Reinforcement learning for logistics and supply chain management: Methodologies, state of the art, and future opportunities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    6. Fuentes, Gabriel, 2021. "Generating bunkering statistics from AIS data: A machine learning approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Rong, H. & Teixeira, A.P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "Maritime traffic probabilistic prediction based on ship motion pattern extraction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    8. Dong, Gang & Zheng, Shiyuan & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2018. "The effects of regional port integration: The case of Ningbo-Zhoushan Port," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 1-15.
    9. Xin, Xuri & Liu, Kezhong & Loughney, Sean & Wang, Jin & Yang, Zaili, 2023. "Maritime traffic clustering to capture high-risk multi-ship encounters in complex waters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    10. Murray, Brian & Perera, Lokukaluge Prasad, 2021. "An AIS-based deep learning framework for regional ship behavior prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    11. Shen, Lixin & Wang, Yaodong & Liu, Kunpeng & Yang, Zaili & Shi, Xiaowen & Yang, Xu & Jing, Ke, 2020. "Synergistic path planning of multi-UAVs for air pollution detection of ships in ports," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    12. Filom, Siyavash & Amiri, Amir M. & Razavi, Saiedeh, 2022. "Applications of machine learning methods in port operations – A systematic literature review," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    13. Hu, Yihong & Zhu, Daoli, 2009. "Empirical analysis of the worldwide maritime transportation network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(10), pages 2061-2071.
    14. Li, Huanhuan & Ren, Xujie & Yang, Zaili, 2023. "Data-driven Bayesian network for risk analysis of global maritime accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    15. Li, Yiliang & Bai, Xiwen & Wang, Qi & Ma, Zhongjun, 2022. "A big data approach to cargo type prediction and its implications for oil trade estimation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    16. Xinqiang Chen & Jun Ling & Yongsheng Yang & Hailin Zheng & Pengwen Xiong & Octavian Postolache & Yong Xiong, 2020. "Ship Trajectory Reconstruction from AIS Sensory Data via Data Quality Control and Prediction," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-9, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eisuke Watanabe & Ryuichi Shibasaki, 2023. "Extraction of Bunkering Services from Automatic Identification System Data and Their International Comparisons," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Ding, Yida & Wandelt, Sebastian & Wu, Guohua & Xu, Yifan & Sun, Xiaoqian, 2023. "Towards efficient airline disruption recovery with reinforcement learning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    3. Gao, Dawei & Zhu, Yongsheng & Yan, Ke & Soares, C. Guedes, 2024. "Deep learning–based framework for regional risk assessment in a multi–ship encounter situation based on the transformer network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    4. Xin, Xuri & Liu, Kezhong & Loughney, Sean & Wang, Jin & Yang, Zaili, 2023. "Maritime traffic clustering to capture high-risk multi-ship encounters in complex waters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    5. Gao, Dawei & Zhu, Yongsheng & Guedes Soares, C., 2023. "Uncertainty modelling and dynamic risk assessment for long-sequence AIS trajectory based on multivariate Gaussian Process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    6. Fang, Chao & Han, Zonglei & Wang, Wei & Zio, Enrico, 2023. "Routing UAVs in landslides Monitoring: A neural network heuristic for team orienteering with mandatory visits," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    7. Laure Rousset & César Ducruet, 2020. "Disruptions in Spatial Networks: a Comparative Study of Major Shocks Affecting Ports and Shipping Patterns," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 423-447, June.
    8. Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Oh Kyoung Kwon & Xiao Ruan, 2019. "Sustainability Challenges in Maritime Transport and Logistics Industry and Its Way Ahead," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-9, March.
    9. He, Xinyu & He, Fang & Li, Lishuai & Zhang, Lei & Xiao, Gang, 2022. "A route network planning method for urban air delivery," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    10. Zheng, Shiyuan & Jiang, Changmin & Fu, Xiaowen, 2021. "Investment competition on dedicated terminals under demand ambiguity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    11. Zhao, Deng & Zhen-fu, Li & Yu-tao, Zhou & Xiao, Chen & Shan-shan, Liang, 2020. "Measurement and spatial spillover effects of port comprehensive strength: Empirical evidence from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 288-298.
    12. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.
    13. Viljoen, Nadia M. & Joubert, Johan W., 2016. "The vulnerability of the global container shipping network to targeted link disruption," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 462(C), pages 396-409.
    14. Pavithra Parthasarathi & David Levinson & Hartwig Hochmair, 2013. "Network Structure and Travel Time Perception," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-13, October.
    15. Calatayud, Agustina & Mangan, John & Palacin, Roberto, 2017. "Connectivity to international markets: A multi-layered network approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 61-71.
    16. Amine Masmoudi, M. & Mancini, Simona & Baldacci, Roberto & Kuo, Yong-Hong, 2022. "Vehicle routing problems with drones equipped with multi-package payload compartments," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    17. Zhang, Qiang & Pu, Shunhao & Luo, Lihua & Liu, Zhichao & Xu, Jie, 2022. "Revisiting important ports in container shipping networks: A structural hole-based approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 239-248.
    18. Nguyen Tran & Hans-Dietrich Haasis, 2014. "Empirical analysis of the container liner shipping network on the East-West corridor (1995–2011)," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 121-153, November.
    19. César Ducruet & Hidekazu Itoh & Justin Berli, 2020. "Urban gravity in the global container shipping network," Post-Print halshs-02588449, HAL.
    20. Jiaguo Liu & Jinxia Zhou & Fan Liu & Xiaohang Yue & Yudan Kong & Xiaoye Wang, 2019. "Interaction Analysis and Sustainable Development Strategy between Port and City: The Case of Liaoning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-25, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:175:y:2023:i:c:s1366554523001400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.