IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v54y2013icp17-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperative traffic control of a mixed network with two urban regions and a freeway

Author

Listed:
  • Haddad, Jack
  • Ramezani, Mohsen
  • Geroliminis, Nikolas

Abstract

Currently most optimization methods for urban transport networks (i) are suited for networks with simplified dynamics that are far from real-sized networks or (ii) apply decentralized control, which is not appropriate for heterogeneously loaded networks or (iii) investigate good-quality solutions through micro-simulation models and scenario analysis, which make the problem intractable in real time. In principle, traffic management decisions for different sub-systems of a transport network (urban, freeway) are controlled by operational rules that are network specific and independent from one traffic authority to another. In this paper, the macroscopic traffic modeling and control of a large-scale mixed transportation network consisting of a freeway and an urban network is tackled. The urban network is partitioned into two regions, each one with a well-defined Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram (MFD), i.e. a unimodal and low-scatter relationship between region density and outflow. The freeway is regarded as one alternative commuting route which has one on-ramp and one off-ramp within each urban region. The urban and freeway flow dynamics are formulated with the tool of MFD and asymmetric cell transmission model, respectively. Perimeter controllers on the border of the urban regions operating to manipulate the perimeter interflow between the two regions, and controllers at the on-ramps for ramp metering are considered to control the flow distribution in the mixed network. The optimal traffic control problem is solved by a Model Predictive Control (MPC) approach in order to minimize total delay in the entire network. Several control policies with different levels of urban-freeway control coordination are introduced and tested to scrutinize the characteristics of the proposed controllers. Numerical results demonstrate how different levels of coordination improve the performance once compared with independent control for freeway and urban network. The approach presented in this paper can be extended to implement efficient real-world control strategies for large-scale mixed traffic networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Haddad, Jack & Ramezani, Mohsen & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2013. "Cooperative traffic control of a mixed network with two urban regions and a freeway," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 17-36.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:54:y:2013:i:c:p:17-36
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2013.03.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261513000477
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2013.03.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olszewski, Piotr & Fan, Henry S. L. & Tan, Yan-Weng, 1995. "Area-wide traffic speed-flow model for the Singapore CBD," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 273-281, July.
    2. Gayah, Vikash V. & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2011. "Clockwise hysteresis loops in the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram: An effect of network instability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 643-655, May.
    3. D. Helbing, 2009. "Derivation of a fundamental diagram for urban traffic flow," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 70(2), pages 229-241, July.
    4. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1994. "The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 269-287, August.
    5. Geroliminis, Nikolas & Boyacı, Burak, 2012. "The effect of variability of urban systems characteristics in the network capacity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1607-1623.
    6. Daganzo, Carlos F., 2007. "Urban gridlock: Macroscopic modeling and mitigation approaches," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 49-62, January.
    7. Zhang, Lele & Garoni, Timothy M & de Gier, Jan, 2013. "A comparative study of Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams of arterial road networks governed by adaptive traffic signal systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-23.
    8. Prashker, Joseph N. & Bekhor, Shlomo, 2000. "Some observations on stochastic user equilibrium and system optimum of traffic assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 277-291, May.
    9. Geroliminis, Nikolas & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2008. "Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: Some experimental findings," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 759-770, November.
    10. Daganzo, Carlos F. & Gayah, Vikash V. & Gonzales, Eric J., 2011. "Macroscopic relations of urban traffic variables: Bifurcations, multivaluedness and instability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 278-288, January.
    11. Daganzo, Carlos F. & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2008. "An analytical approximation for the macroscopic fundamental diagram of urban traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 771-781, November.
    12. Ji, Yuxuan & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2012. "On the spatial partitioning of urban transportation networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1639-1656.
    13. Daganzo, Carlos F & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2008. "An analytical approximation for the macropscopic fundamental diagram of urban traffic," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt4cb8h3jm, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    14. Amin Mazloumian & Nikolas Geroliminis & Dirk Helbing, "undated". "The Spatial Variability of Vehicle Densities as Determinant of Urban Network Capacity," Working Papers CCSS-09-009, ETH Zurich, Chair of Systems Design.
    15. Haddad, Jack & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2012. "On the stability of traffic perimeter control in two-region urban cities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1159-1176.
    16. Geroliminis, Nikolas & Sun, Jie, 2011. "Hysteresis phenomena of a Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram in freeway networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 966-979, November.
    17. Keyvan-Ekbatani, Mehdi & Kouvelas, Anastasios & Papamichail, Ioannis & Papageorgiou, Markos, 2012. "Exploiting the fundamental diagram of urban networks for feedback-based gating," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1393-1403.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramezani, Mohsen & Haddad, Jack & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2015. "Dynamics of heterogeneity in urban networks: aggregated traffic modeling and hierarchical control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-19.
    2. Gayah, Vikash V. & Gao, Xueyu (Shirley) & Nagle, Andrew S., 2014. "On the impacts of locally adaptive signal control on urban network stability and the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 255-268.
    3. Haddad, Jack & Zheng, Zhengfei, 2020. "Adaptive perimeter control for multi-region accumulation-based models with state delays," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 133-153.
    4. Zhang, Lele & Garoni, Timothy M & de Gier, Jan, 2013. "A comparative study of Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams of arterial road networks governed by adaptive traffic signal systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-23.
    5. Jin, Wen-Long & Gan, Qi-Jian & Gayah, Vikash V., 2013. "A kinematic wave approach to traffic statics and dynamics in a double-ring network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 114-131.
    6. Haddad, Jack & Shraiber, Arie, 2014. "Robust perimeter control design for an urban region," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 315-332.
    7. Zhong, R.X. & Chen, C. & Huang, Y.P. & Sumalee, A. & Lam, W.H.K. & Xu, D.B., 2018. "Robust perimeter control for two urban regions with macroscopic fundamental diagrams: A control-Lyapunov function approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 687-707.
    8. Leclercq, Ludovic & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2013. "Estimating MFDs in simple networks with route choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 468-484.
    9. Zheng, Nan & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2013. "On the distribution of urban road space for multimodal congested networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 326-341.
    10. Wada, Kentaro & Satsukawa, Koki & Smith, Mike & Akamatsu, Takashi, 2019. "Network throughput under dynamic user equilibrium: Queue spillback, paradox and traffic control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 391-413.
    11. Du, Jie & Wong, S.C. & Shu, Chi-Wang & Zhang, Mengping, 2015. "Reformulating the Hoogendoorn–Bovy predictive dynamic user-optimal model in continuum space with anisotropic condition," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 189-217.
    12. Haddad, Jack, 2017. "Optimal perimeter control synthesis for two urban regions with aggregate boundary queue dynamics," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 1-25.
    13. Ambühl, Lukas & Loder, Allister & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Menendez, Monica & Axhausen, Kay W., 2020. "A functional form with a physical meaning for the macroscopic fundamental diagram," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 119-132.
    14. Guo, Qiangqiang & Ban, Xuegang (Jeff), 2020. "Macroscopic fundamental diagram based perimeter control considering dynamic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 87-109.
    15. Amirgholy, Mahyar & Shahabi, Mehrdad & Gao, H. Oliver, 2017. "Optimal design of sustainable transit systems in congested urban networks: A macroscopic approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 261-285.
    16. Geroliminis, Nikolas & Boyacı, Burak, 2012. "The effect of variability of urban systems characteristics in the network capacity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1607-1623.
    17. Loder, Allister & Dakic, Igor & Bressan, Lea & Ambühl, Lukas & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Menendez, Monica & Axhausen, Kay W., 2019. "Capturing network properties with a functional form for the multi-modal macroscopic fundamental diagram," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1-19.
    18. Gao, Xueyu (Shirley) & Gayah, Vikash V., 2018. "An analytical framework to model uncertainty in urban network dynamics using Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 660-675.
    19. Yang, Lei & Yin, Suwan & Han, Ke & Haddad, Jack & Hu, Minghua, 2017. "Fundamental diagrams of airport surface traffic: Models and applications," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 29-51.
    20. Su, Z.C. & Chow, Andy H.F. & Fang, C.L. & Liang, E.M. & Zhong, R.X., 2023. "Hierarchical control for stochastic network traffic with reinforcement learning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 196-216.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:54:y:2013:i:c:p:17-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.