IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v38y2004i2p169-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pedestrian route-choice and activity scheduling theory and models

Author

Listed:
  • Hoogendoorn, S. P.
  • Bovy, P. H. L.

Abstract

Among the most interesting and challenging theoretical and practical problems in describing pedestrians behavior are route choice and activity scheduling. Compared to other modes of transport, a characteristic feature of pedestrian route choice is that routes are continuous trajectories in time and space: since a pedestrian chooses a route from an infinite set of alternatives, dedicated theories and models describing pedestrian route choice are required. This article puts forward a new theory of pedestrian behavior under uncertainty based on the concept of utility maximization. The main behavioral assumption is that pedestrians optimize some predicted pedestrian-specific utility function, representing a trade-off between the utility gained from performing activities at a specific location, and the predicted cost of walking subject to the physical limitations of the pedestrians and the kinematics of the pedestrian. The uncertainty reflects the randomness of the experienced traffic conditions. Based on this normative theory, route choice, activity area choice, and activity scheduling are simultaneously optimized using dynamic programming for different traffic conditions and uncertainty levels. Throughout the article, the concepts are illustrated by examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoogendoorn, S. P. & Bovy, P. H. L., 2004. "Pedestrian route-choice and activity scheduling theory and models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 169-190, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:38:y:2004:i:2:p:169-190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191-2615(03)00007-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hughes, Roger L., 2002. "A continuum theory for the flow of pedestrians," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 507-535, July.
    2. Løvås, Gunnar G., 1994. "Modeling and simulation of pedestrian traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 429-443, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hänseler, Flurin S. & Bierlaire, Michel & Farooq, Bilal & Mühlematter, Thomas, 2014. "A macroscopic loading model for time-varying pedestrian flows in public walking areas," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 60-80.
    2. Gao, Jin & He, Jun & Gong, Jinghai, 2020. "A simplified method to provide evacuation guidance in a multi-exit building under emergency," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    3. Hänseler, Flurin S. & Lam, William H.K. & Bierlaire, Michel & Lederrey, Gael & Nikolić, Marija, 2017. "A dynamic network loading model for anisotropic and congested pedestrian flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 149-168.
    4. Hänseler, Flurin S. & Bierlaire, Michel & Scarinci, Riccardo, 2016. "Assessing the usage and level-of-service of pedestrian facilities in train stations: A Swiss case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 106-123.
    5. Tanimoto, Jun & Hagishima, Aya & Tanaka, Yasukaka, 2010. "Study of bottleneck effect at an emergency evacuation exit using cellular automata model, mean field approximation analysis, and game theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(24), pages 5611-5618.
    6. Giovanni Musolino & Reza Ahmadian & Junqiang Xia, 2022. "Enhancing pedestrian evacuation routes during flood events," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 112(3), pages 1941-1965, July.
    7. Saberi, Meead & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Sobhani, Amir, 2015. "Spatial fluctuations of pedestrian velocities in bidirectional streams: Exploring the effects of self-organization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 434(C), pages 120-128.
    8. Hu, Xiangmin & Chen, Tao & Deng, Kaifeng & Wang, Guanning, 2023. "Effects of aggressiveness on pedestrian room evacuation using extended cellular automata model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 619(C).
    9. Qingyan Ning & Maosheng Li, 2022. "Modeling Pedestrian Detour Behavior By-Passing Conflict Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Wang, Shuaian & Zhang, Wei & Qu, Xiaobo, 2018. "Trial-and-error train fare design scheme for addressing boarding/alighting congestion at CBD stations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 318-335.
    11. Haghani, Milad & Sarvi, Majid & Shahhoseini, Zahra, 2019. "When ‘push’ does not come to ‘shove’: Revisiting ‘faster is slower’ in collective egress of human crowds," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 51-69.
    12. Zheng, Xiaoping & Li, Wei & Guan, Chao, 2010. "Simulation of evacuation processes in a square with a partition wall using a cellular automaton model for pedestrian dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(11), pages 2177-2188.
    13. Ma, Wanjing & Li, Li & Wang, Yinhai, 2016. "A driving force model for non-strict priority crossing behaviors of right-turn driversAuthor-Name: Lin, Dianchao," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 230-244.
    14. Zhu, Yu & Chen, Tao & Ding, Ning & Chraibi, Mohcine & Fan, Wei-Cheng, 2021. "Follow people or signs? A novel way-finding method based on experiments and simulation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 573(C).
    15. Ziyou Gao & Yunchao Qu & Xingang Li & Jiancheng Long & Hai-Jun Huang, 2014. "Simulating the Dynamic Escape Process in Large Public Places," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1344-1357, December.
    16. Mohd Ibrahim, Azhar & Venkat, Ibrahim & Wilde, Philippe De, 2017. "Uncertainty in a spatial evacuation model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 479(C), pages 485-497.
    17. Zhou, Zi-Xuan & Nakanishi, Wataru & Asakura, Yasuo, 2021. "Data-driven framework for the adaptive exit selection problem in pedestrian flow: Visual information based heuristics approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 583(C).
    18. Flurin S. Hänseler & Nicholas A. Molyneaux & Michel Bierlaire, 2017. "Estimation of Pedestrian Origin-Destination Demand in Train Stations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 981-997, August.
    19. He, Mengchen & Wang, Qiao & Chen, Juan & Xu, Shiwei & Ma, Jian, 2023. "Modeling pedestrian walking behavior in the flow field with moving walkways," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 619(C).
    20. Li, Shuang & Yu, Xiaohui & Zhang, Yanjuan & Zhai, Changhai, 2018. "A numerical simulation strategy on occupant evacuation behaviors and casualty prediction in a building during earthquakes," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 1238-1250.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:38:y:2004:i:2:p:169-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.