IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v102y2017icp210-237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A stochastic program approach for path reconstruction oriented sensor location model

Author

Listed:
  • Fu, Chenyi
  • Zhu, Ning
  • Ma, Shoufeng

Abstract

Path flow identification is of particular interest for a number of traffic applications, such as OD demand estimation, link flow inference, and toll freeway revenue management. Optimal positioning of active sensors can help to identify path flows. Due to the stochastic nature of transportation systems, we propose a scenario based two stage stochastic programming framework which considers the uncertainty of the link-path matrix. The first stage model aims to minimize the total traffic sensor installation cost and the expected penalty for uncovered and undifferentiated paths. The second stage model attempts to minimize uncovered and undifferentiated paths for a given sensor location pattern and a specific scenario. In addition, a mean risk measure is also incorporated into the two stage stochastic programming framework, and consequently a mean risk two stage stochastic programming model is proposed. Both models have the same structure, where the first stage and second stage decision variables are binary. The second stage decision variable can be relaxed to a continuous variable without changing the nature of the model. To solve the two stochastic programming models, a branch and bound based integer L-shaped algorithm is presented. Finite steps convergence is guaranteed for the algorithm. To handle the problem with a large number of scenarios, a sampling technique is introduced, and the confidence bound is analyzed with respect to the scenario size. Extensive numerical experiments are conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed models and algorithm. The most important numerical results are as follows: (i) the stochastic programming framework is capable of capturing the reality more efficiently and accurately, (ii) the path differentiation factor is more critical than the path coverage factor in determining the sensor placement pattern, and (iii) in the partial parameter setting case, the mean risk based stochastic programming model results in a significantly different sensor placement pattern compared to the normal stochastic programming model. The study contributes to practical sensor placement design.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu, Chenyi & Zhu, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng, 2017. "A stochastic program approach for path reconstruction oriented sensor location model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 210-237.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:102:y:2017:i:c:p:210-237
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2017.05.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261516307937
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2017.05.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gendreau, Michel & Laporte, Gilbert & Seguin, Rene, 1996. "Stochastic vehicle routing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 3-12, January.
    2. Ng, ManWo, 2013. "Partial link flow observability in the presence of initial sensors: Solution without path enumeration," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 62-66.
    3. Hu, Shou-Ren & Peeta, Srinivas & Chu, Chun-Hsiao, 2009. "Identification of vehicle sensor locations for link-based network traffic applications," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(8-9), pages 873-894, September.
    4. Xing, Tao & Zhou, Xuesong & Taylor, Jeffrey, 2013. "Designing heterogeneous sensor networks for estimating and predicting path travel time dynamics: An information-theoretic modeling approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 66-90.
    5. Andrzej Ruszczyński & Alexander Shapiro, 2006. "Optimization of Convex Risk Functions," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 433-452, August.
    6. Owen, Susan Hesse & Daskin, Mark S., 1998. "Strategic facility location: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(3), pages 423-447, December.
    7. Clark, Stephen & Watling, David, 2005. "Modelling network travel time reliability under stochastic demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 119-140, February.
    8. He, Sheng-xue, 2013. "A graphical approach to identify sensor locations for link flow inference," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 65-76.
    9. Enrique Castillo & Ana Rivas & Pilar Jiménez & José Menéndez, 2012. "Observability in traffic networks. Plate scanning added by counting information," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 1301-1333, November.
    10. M. Gentili & P. Mirchandani, 2005. "Locating Active Sensors on Traffic Networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 229-257, April.
    11. Castillo, Enrique & Menéndez, José María & Jiménez, Pilar, 2008. "Trip matrix and path flow reconstruction and estimation based on plate scanning and link observations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 455-481, June.
    12. An, Kun & Lo, Hong K., 2016. "Two-phase stochastic program for transit network design under demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 157-181.
    13. Fu, Chenyi & Zhu, Ning & Ling, Shuai & Ma, Shoufeng & Huang, Yongxi, 2016. "Heterogeneous sensor location model for path reconstruction," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 77-97.
    14. Mínguez, R. & Sánchez-Cambronero, S. & Castillo, E. & Jiménez, P., 2010. "Optimal traffic plate scanning location for OD trip matrix and route estimation in road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 282-298, February.
    15. Ng, ManWo, 2012. "Synergistic sensor location for link flow inference without path enumeration: A node-based approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 781-788.
    16. Liu, Henry X. & Recker, Will & Chen, Anthony, 2004. "Uncovering the contribution of travel time reliability to dynamic route choice using real-time loop data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 435-453, July.
    17. Ehlert, Anett & Bell, Michael G.H. & Grosso, Sergio, 2006. "The optimisation of traffic count locations in road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 460-479, July.
    18. Lucio Bianco & Giuseppe Confessore & Pierfrancesco Reverberi, 2001. "A Network Based Model for Traffic Sensor Location with Implications on O/D Matrix Estimates," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 50-60, February.
    19. Viti, Francesco & Rinaldi, Marco & Corman, Francesco & Tampère, Chris M.J., 2014. "Assessing partial observability in network sensor location problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 65-89.
    20. George B. Dantzig, 1955. "Linear Programming under Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3-4), pages 197-206, 04-07.
    21. Julia L. Higle & Suvrajeet Sen, 1991. "Stochastic Decomposition: An Algorithm for Two-Stage Linear Programs with Recourse," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 650-669, August.
    22. Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2011. "Reliable sensor deployment for network traffic surveillance," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 218-231, January.
    23. Simonelli, Fulvio & Marzano, Vittorio & Papola, Andrea & Vitiello, Iolanda, 2012. "A network sensor location procedure accounting for o–d matrix estimate variability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1624-1638.
    24. Yang, Hai & Zhou, Jing, 1998. "Optimal traffic counting locations for origin-destination matrix estimation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 109-126, February.
    25. Zuo-Jun Max Shen & Roger Lezhou Zhan & Jiawei Zhang, 2011. "The Reliable Facility Location Problem: Formulations, Heuristics, and Approximation Algorithms," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 470-482, August.
    26. W. Burke Jackson & James V. Jucker, 1982. "An Empirical Study of Travel Time Variability and Travel Choice Behavior," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 460-475, November.
    27. Yang, Yudi & Fan, Yueyue, 2015. "Data dependent input control for origin–destination demand estimation using observability analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 385-403.
    28. Xuesong Zhou & George F. List, 2010. "An Information-Theoretic Sensor Location Model for Traffic Origin-Destination Demand Estimation Applications," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 254-273, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Baoli & Li, Zhi-Chun & Wang, Yadong, 2022. "A two-stage stochastic programming model for seaport berth and channel planning with uncertainties in ship arrival and handling times," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Shoufeng Ma & Hongming Li & Ning Zhu & Chenyi Fu, 2021. "Stochastic programming approach for unidirectional quay crane scheduling problem with uncertainty," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 137-174, April.
    3. Salari, Mostafa & Kattan, Lina & Lam, William H.K. & Lo, H.P. & Esfeh, Mohammad Ansari, 2019. "Optimization of traffic sensor location for complete link flow observability in traffic network considering sensor failure," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 216-251.
    4. Tao, Yi & Wu, Jianhuang & Lai, Xiaofan & Wang, Fan, 2020. "Network planning and operation of sustainable closed-loop supply chains in emerging markets: Retail market configurations and carbon policies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Owais, Mahmoud & Moussa, Ghada S. & Hussain, Khaled F., 2019. "Sensor location model for O/D estimation: Multi-criteria meta-heuristics approach," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    6. Rinaldi, Marco & Viti, Francesco, 2017. "Exact and approximate route set generation for resilient partial observability in sensor location problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 86-119.
    7. Zhu, Ning & Fu, Chenyi & Zhang, Xuanyi & Ma, Shoufeng, 2022. "A network sensor location problem for link flow observability and estimation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 428-448.
    8. Yiming Li & Zeyang Cheng & Xinpeng Yao & Zhiqiang Kong & Zijian Wang & Mengfei Liu, 2023. "Multi-Objective Optimal Deployment of Road Traffic Monitoring Cameras: A Case Study in Wujiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Fu, Hao & Lam, William H.K. & Shao, Hu & Kattan, Lina & Salari, Mostafa, 2022. "Optimization of multi-type traffic sensor locations for estimation of multi-period origin-destination demands with covariance effects," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fu, Chenyi & Zhu, Ning & Ling, Shuai & Ma, Shoufeng & Huang, Yongxi, 2016. "Heterogeneous sensor location model for path reconstruction," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 77-97.
    2. Zhu, Ning & Fu, Chenyi & Zhang, Xuanyi & Ma, Shoufeng, 2022. "A network sensor location problem for link flow observability and estimation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 428-448.
    3. Lo, Hong K. & Chen, Anthony & Castillo, Enrique, 2016. "Robust network sensor location for complete link flow observability under uncertaintyAuthor-Name: Xu, Xiangdong," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1-20.
    4. Salari, Mostafa & Kattan, Lina & Lam, William H.K. & Lo, H.P. & Esfeh, Mohammad Ansari, 2019. "Optimization of traffic sensor location for complete link flow observability in traffic network considering sensor failure," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 216-251.
    5. Hadavi, Majid & Shafahi, Yousef, 2016. "Vehicle identification sensor models for origin–destination estimation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 82-106.
    6. Viti, Francesco & Rinaldi, Marco & Corman, Francesco & Tampère, Chris M.J., 2014. "Assessing partial observability in network sensor location problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 65-89.
    7. Owais, Mahmoud & Moussa, Ghada S. & Hussain, Khaled F., 2019. "Sensor location model for O/D estimation: Multi-criteria meta-heuristics approach," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    8. Rinaldi, Marco & Viti, Francesco, 2017. "Exact and approximate route set generation for resilient partial observability in sensor location problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 86-119.
    9. He, Sheng-xue, 2013. "A graphical approach to identify sensor locations for link flow inference," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 65-76.
    10. Hyoshin (John) Park & Ali Haghani & Song Gao & Michael A. Knodler & Siby Samuel, 2018. "Anticipatory Dynamic Traffic Sensor Location Problems with Connected Vehicle Technologies," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 1299-1326, December.
    11. Shi An & Lina Ma & Jian Wang, 2020. "Optimization of Traffic Detector Layout Based on Complex Network Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, March.
    12. Yang, Yudi & Fan, Yueyue, 2015. "Data dependent input control for origin–destination demand estimation using observability analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 385-403.
    13. Abdullah Alshehri & Mahmoud Owais & Jayadev Gyani & Mishal H. Aljarbou & Saleh Alsulamy, 2023. "Residual Neural Networks for Origin–Destination Trip Matrix Estimation from Traffic Sensor Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Fu, Hao & Lam, William H.K. & Shao, Hu & Ma, Wei & Chen, Bi Yu & Ho, H.W., 2022. "Optimization of multi-type sensor locations for simultaneous estimation of origin-destination demands and link travel times with covariance effects," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 19-47.
    15. Bagloee, Saeed Asadi & Sarvi, Majid & Wolshon, Brian & Dixit, Vinayak, 2017. "Identifying critical disruption scenarios and a global robustness index tailored to real life road networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 60-81.
    16. Xiaopeng Li & Yanfeng Ouyang, 2012. "Reliable Traffic Sensor Deployment Under Probabilistic Disruptions and Generalized Surveillance Effectiveness Measures," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1183-1198, October.
    17. Simonelli, Fulvio & Marzano, Vittorio & Papola, Andrea & Vitiello, Iolanda, 2012. "A network sensor location procedure accounting for o–d matrix estimate variability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1624-1638.
    18. Rodriguez-Vega, Martin & Canudas-de-Wit, Carlos & Fourati, Hassen, 2019. "Location of turning ratio and flow sensors for flow reconstruction in large traffic networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 21-40.
    19. Saif Eddin Jabari & Laura Wynter, 2016. "Sensor placement with time-to-detection guarantees," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(4), pages 415-433, December.
    20. Ng, ManWo, 2012. "Synergistic sensor location for link flow inference without path enumeration: A node-based approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 781-788.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:102:y:2017:i:c:p:210-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.