IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v98y2017icp14-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative study of funnel shape bottlenecks in subway stations

Author

Listed:
  • Sun, Lishan
  • Luo, Wei
  • Yao, Liya
  • Qiu, Shi
  • Rong, Jian

Abstract

A bottleneck typically denotes a narrowed area that reduces the flow through a channel. Congestion is expected to form at bottlenecks such as escalator and staircase entrances with high rate of passenger flow, which could decrease walking efficiency and passenger comfort. Currently, no special treatment is adopted in most of the conventional bottlenecks in subway stations. This study conducts a series of pedestrian experiments to investigate the effectiveness of adding a funnel shape buffer zone in front of the bottleneck entrance. Different angles of funnel bottleneck are experimented under different pedestrian volumes. By analyzing factors including walking speed, individual passing time, total passing time, and time gap, it is found that funnel shape would overall improve the traffic effectiveness of the bottlenecks, especially when the flow rate is high. The recommendation of setting funnel angle depends on passenger flow level, the optimal of which should be between 46° and 65°. This study provides a rationale for agencies to improve the current pedestrian traffic efficiency at bottlenecks.

Suggested Citation

  • Sun, Lishan & Luo, Wei & Yao, Liya & Qiu, Shi & Rong, Jian, 2017. "A comparative study of funnel shape bottlenecks in subway stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 14-27.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:98:y:2017:i:c:p:14-27
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.01.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856415302974
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2017.01.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Kyung Min & Hong, Sung-Pil & Ko, Suk-Joon & Kim, Dowon, 2015. "Does crowding affect the path choice of metro passengers?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 292-304.
    2. Liao, Weichen & Tordeux, Antoine & Seyfried, Armin & Chraibi, Mohcine & Drzycimski, Kevin & Zheng, Xiaoping & Zhao, Ying, 2016. "Measuring the steady state of pedestrian flow in bottleneck experiments," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 461(C), pages 248-261.
    3. Cox, Tom & Houdmont, Jonathan & Griffiths, Amanda, 2006. "Rail passenger crowding, stress, health and safety in Britain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 244-258, March.
    4. Armin Seyfried & Oliver Passon & Bernhard Steffen & Maik Boltes & Tobias Rupprecht & Wolfram Klingsch, 2009. "New Insights into Pedestrian Flow Through Bottlenecks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 395-406, August.
    5. Lam, William H. K. & Cheung, Chung-Yu & Lam, C. F., 1999. "A study of crowding effects at the Hong Kong light rail transit stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 401-415, June.
    6. Guo, Ren-Yong, 2014. "Simulation of spatial and temporal separation of pedestrian counter flow through a bottleneck," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 415(C), pages 428-439.
    7. Fernández, Rodrigo & Valencia, Alejandra & Seriani, Sebastian, 2015. "On passenger saturation flow in public transport doors," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 102-112.
    8. Steffen, B. & Seyfried, A., 2010. "Methods for measuring pedestrian density, flow, speed and direction with minimal scatter," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(9), pages 1902-1910.
    9. Serge P. Hoogendoorn & W. Daamen, 2005. "Pedestrian Behavior at Bottlenecks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(2), pages 147-159, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Hui & Xu, Jie & Jia, Limin & Shi, Yihan, 2022. "Modelling the walking behavior of pedestrians in the junction with chamfer zone of subway station," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 602(C).
    2. Li, Na & Guo, Ren-Yong, 2020. "Simulation of bi-directional pedestrian flow through a bottleneck: Cell transmission model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 555(C).
    3. Zhonghua Wei & Sinan Chu & Zhengde Huang & Shi Qiu & Qixuan Zhao, 2020. "Optimization Design of X-ray Conveyer Belt Length for Subway Security Check Systems in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Ren, Xiangxia & Zhang, Jun & Song, Weiguo & Cao, Shuchao, 2021. "Mechanisms of passing through short exits for the elderly and young adults," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 195-213.
    5. Meiying Jiang & Qibing Jin & Lisheng Cheng, 2019. "Effects of Ticket-Checking Failure on Dynamics of Pedestrians at Multi-Exit Inspection Points with Various Layouts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Liang, Mengdi & Xu, Jie & Jia, Limin & Qin, Yong, 2020. "An improved model of passenger merging in a Y-shaped passage," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    7. Shi, Yihan & Xu, Jie & Zhang, Hui & Jia, Limin & Qin, Yong, 2022. "Empirical investigation on turning behavior of passengers in subway station," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 606(C).
    8. Zhang, Hui & Xu, Jie & Jia, Limin & Shi, Yihan, 2021. "Research on walking efficiency of passengers around corner of subway station," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 573(C).
    9. Shi, Yihan & Xu, Jie & Zhang, Hui & Jia, Limin & Qin, Yong, 2022. "Walking model on passenger in merging passage of subway station considering overtaking behavior," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 585(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haghani, Milad & Sarvi, Majid & Shahhoseini, Zahra, 2019. "When ‘push’ does not come to ‘shove’: Revisiting ‘faster is slower’ in collective egress of human crowds," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 51-69.
    2. Ji, Yanjie & Gao, Liangpeng & Chen, Dandan & Ma, Xinwei & Zhang, Ruochen, 2018. "How does a static measure influence passengers’ boarding behaviors and bus dwell time? Simulated evidence from Nanjing bus stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 13-25.
    3. Sebastian Seriani & Jose Miguel Barriga & Alvaro Peña & Alejandra Valencia & Vicente Aprigliano & Lorena Jorquera & Hernan Pinto & Matías Valenzuela & Taku Fujiyama, 2022. "Analyzing the Effect of Crowds on Passenger Behavior Inside Urban Trains through Laboratory Experiments—A Pilot Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Cao, Shuchao & Lian, Liping & Chen, Mingyi & Yao, Ming & Song, Weiguo & Fang, Zhiming, 2018. "Investigation of difference of fundamental diagrams in pedestrian flow," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 506(C), pages 661-670.
    5. Wang, Jiayue & Boltes, Maik & Seyfried, Armin & Zhang, Jun & Ziemer, Verena & Weng, Wenguo, 2018. "Linking pedestrian flow characteristics with stepping locomotion," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 500(C), pages 106-120.
    6. Mira Küpper & Armin Seyfried, 2020. "Analysis of Space Usage on Train Station Platforms Based on Trajectory Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Yurong Mo & Shiyao Qiu & Jiali Tang & Zhihong Li, 2024. "Investigating the Dynamics of Pedestrian Flow through Different Transition Bottlenecks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Hänseler, Flurin S. & Bierlaire, Michel & Scarinci, Riccardo, 2016. "Assessing the usage and level-of-service of pedestrian facilities in train stations: A Swiss case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 106-123.
    9. Krbálek, Milan & Hrabák, Pavel & Bukáček, Marek, 2018. "Pedestrian headways — Reflection of territorial social forces," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 38-49.
    10. Hu, Yanghui & Zhang, Jun & Song, Weiguo, 2019. "Experimental study on the movement strategies of individuals in multidirectional flows," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    11. Saberi, Meead & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Sobhani, Amir, 2015. "Spatial fluctuations of pedestrian velocities in bidirectional streams: Exploring the effects of self-organization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 434(C), pages 120-128.
    12. Paudel, Jayash, 2021. "Bus ridership and service reliability: The case of public transportation in Western Massachusetts," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 98-107.
    13. Xu, Xin-yue & Liu, Jun & Li, Hai-ying & Jiang, Man, 2016. "Capacity-oriented passenger flow control under uncertain demand: Algorithm development and real-world case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 130-148.
    14. Milad Haghani & Majid Sarvi & Zahra Shahhoseini & Maik Boltes, 2016. "How Simple Hypothetical-Choice Experiments Can Be Utilized to Learn Humans’ Navigational Escape Decisions in Emergencies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, November.
    15. Wang, Shuaian & Zhang, Wei & Qu, Xiaobo, 2018. "Trial-and-error train fare design scheme for addressing boarding/alighting congestion at CBD stations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 318-335.
    16. Jiang, Yan-Qun & Hu, Ying-Gang & Huang, Xiaoqian, 2022. "Modeling pedestrian flow through a bottleneck based on a second-order continuum model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 608(P1).
    17. Shang, Pan & Li, Ruimin & Guo, Jifu & Xian, Kai & Zhou, Xuesong, 2019. "Integrating Lagrangian and Eulerian observations for passenger flow state estimation in an urban rail transit network: A space-time-state hyper network-based assignment approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 135-167.
    18. Liang, Jinpeng & Zang, Guangzhi & Liu, Haitao & Zheng, Jianfeng & Gao, Ziyou, 2023. "Reducing passenger waiting time in oversaturated metro lines with passenger flow control policy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    19. Huang, Shenshi & Zhang, Teng & Lo, Siuming & Lu, Shouxiang & Li, Changhai, 2018. "Experimental study of individual and single-file pedestrian movement in narrow seat aisle," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 509(C), pages 1023-1033.
    20. Yamamoto, Hiroki & Yanagisawa, Daichi & Feliciani, Claudio & Nishinari, Katsuhiro, 2019. "Body-rotation behavior of pedestrians for collision avoidance in passing and cross flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 486-510.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:98:y:2017:i:c:p:14-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.