IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v83y2016icp42-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tarmac delay policies: A passenger-centric analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yan, Chiwei
  • Vaze, Vikrant
  • Vanderboll, Allison
  • Barnhart, Cynthia

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the effectiveness of the 2010 Tarmac Delay Rule from a passenger-centric point of view. The Tarmac Delay Rule stipulates that aircraft lift-off, or an opportunity for passengers to deplane, must occur no later than 3h after the cabin door closure at the gate of the departure airport; and that an opportunity for passengers to deplane must occur no later than 3h after the touchdown at the arrival airport. The Tarmac Delay Rule aims to protect enplaned passengers on commercial aircraft from excessively long delays on the tarmac upon taxi-out or taxi-in, and monetarily penalizes airlines that violate the stipulated 3-h tarmac time limit. Comparing the actual flight schedule and delay data after the Tarmac Delay Rule was in effect with that before, we find that the Rule has been highly effective in reducing the frequency of occurrence of long tarmac times. However, another significant effect of the rule has been the rise in flight cancellation rates. Cancellations result in passengers requiring rebooking, and often lead to extensive delay in reaching their final destinations. Using an algorithm to estimate passenger delay, we quantify delays to passengers in 2007, before the Tarmac Delay Rule was enacted, and compare these delays to those estimated for hypothetical scenarios with the Tarmac Delay Rule in effect for that same year. Our delay estimates are calculated using U.S. Department of Transportation data from 2007. Through our results and several sensitivity analyses, we show that the overall impact of the current Tarmac Delay Rule is a significant increase in passenger delays, especially for passengers scheduled to travel on the flights which are at risk of long tarmac delays. We evaluate the impacts on passengers of a number of rule variations, including changes to the maximum time on the tarmac, and variations in that maximum by time-of-day. Through extensive scenario analyses, we conclude that a better balance between the conflicting objectives of reducing the frequency of long tarmac times and reducing total passenger delays can be achieved through a modified version of the existing rule. This modified version involves increasing the tarmac time limit to 3.5h and only applying the rule to flights with planned departure times before 5pm. Finally, in order to implement the Rule more effectively, we suggest the tarmac time limit to be defined in terms of the time when the aircraft begin returning to the gate instead of being defined in terms of the time when passengers are allowed to deplane.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan, Chiwei & Vaze, Vikrant & Vanderboll, Allison & Barnhart, Cynthia, 2016. "Tarmac delay policies: A passenger-centric analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 42-62.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:83:y:2016:i:c:p:42-62
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.11.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856415002682
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2015.11.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cynthia Barnhart & Douglas Fearing & Vikrant Vaze, 2014. "Modeling Passenger Travel and Delays in the National Air Transportation System," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 580-601, June.
    2. Jay M. Rosenberger & Ellis L. Johnson & George L. Nemhauser, 2004. "A Robust Fleet-Assignment Model with Hub Isolation and Short Cycles," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 357-368, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Max Z. & Ryerson, Megan S., 2019. "Reviewing the DATAS of aviation research data: Diversity, availability, tractability, applicability, and sources," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 111-130.
    2. Zhu, Yiwen & Koutsopoulos, Haris N. & Wilson, Nigel H.M., 2017. "A probabilistic Passenger-to-Train Assignment Model based on automated data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 522-542.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Yifan & Wandelt, Sebastian & Sun, Xiaoqian, 2021. "Airline integrated robust scheduling with a variable neighborhood search based heuristic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 181-203.
    2. João P. Pita & Cynthia Barnhart & António P. Antunes, 2013. "Integrated Flight Scheduling and Fleet Assignment Under Airport Congestion," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 477-492, November.
    3. Barry C. Smith & Ellis L. Johnson, 2006. "Robust Airline Fleet Assignment: Imposing Station Purity Using Station Decomposition," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 497-516, November.
    4. Liang, Zhe & Feng, Yuan & Zhang, Xiaoning & Wu, Tao & Chaovalitwongse, Wanpracha Art, 2015. "Robust weekly aircraft maintenance routing problem and the extension to the tail assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 238-259.
    5. Christos Nicolaides & Demetris Avraam & Luis Cueto‐Felgueroso & Marta C. González & Ruben Juanes, 2020. "Hand‐Hygiene Mitigation Strategies Against Global Disease Spreading through the Air Transportation Network," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(4), pages 723-740, April.
    6. Jon D. Petersen & Gustaf Sölveling & John-Paul Clarke & Ellis L. Johnson & Sergey Shebalov, 2012. "An Optimization Approach to Airline Integrated Recovery," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 482-500, November.
    7. Lee, Loo Hay & Lee, Chul Ung & Tan, Yen Ping, 2007. "A multi-objective genetic algorithm for robust flight scheduling using simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1948-1968, March.
    8. Michelle Dunbar & Gary Froyland & Cheng-Lung Wu, 2012. "Robust Airline Schedule Planning: Minimizing Propagated Delay in an Integrated Routing and Crewing Framework," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 204-216, May.
    9. Sherali, Hanif D. & Bish, Ebru K. & Zhu, Xiaomei, 2006. "Airline fleet assignment concepts, models, and algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(1), pages 1-30, July.
    10. Nikolas Pyrgiotis & Amedeo Odoni, 2016. "On the Impact of Scheduling Limits: A Case Study at Newark Liberty International Airport," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 150-165, February.
    11. Alexandre Jacquillat & Vikrant Vaze, 2018. "Interairline Equity in Airport Scheduling Interventions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 941-964, August.
    12. Wang, Xiubin & Regan, Amelia, 2006. "Dynamic yield management when aircraft assignments are subject to swap," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 563-576, August.
    13. Ding, Yida & Wandelt, Sebastian & Wu, Guohua & Xu, Yifan & Sun, Xiaoqian, 2023. "Towards efficient airline disruption recovery with reinforcement learning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    14. Gary Froyland & Stephen J. Maher & Cheng-Lung Wu, 2014. "The Recoverable Robust Tail Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 351-372, August.
    15. Zhu, Yiwen & Koutsopoulos, Haris N. & Wilson, Nigel H.M., 2017. "A probabilistic Passenger-to-Train Assignment Model based on automated data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 522-542.
    16. Sergey Shebalov & Diego Klabjan, 2006. "Robust Airline Crew Pairing: Move-up Crews," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 300-312, August.
    17. Sismanidou, Athina & Tarradellas, Joan & Suau-Sanchez, Pere, 2022. "The uneven geography of US air traffic delays: Quantifying the impact of connecting passengers on delay propagation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    18. Keji Wei & Vikrant Vaze, 2020. "Airline Timetable Development and Fleet Assignment Incorporating Passenger Choice," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 139-163, January.
    19. Li, Max Z. & Ryerson, Megan S., 2019. "Reviewing the DATAS of aviation research data: Diversity, availability, tractability, applicability, and sources," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 111-130.
    20. Pagoni, Ioanna & Psaraki-Kalouptsidi, Voula, 2016. "The impact of carbon emission fees on passenger demand and air fares: A game theoretic approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 41-51.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:83:y:2016:i:c:p:42-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.