IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v72y2023ics0160791x23000015.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

We need to talk about engineering policy

Author

Listed:
  • Cooper, Adam C.G.
  • Lioté, Laurent
  • Colomer, Chloé

Abstract

The governance of engineering, unlike science, is rarely discussed in the academy. We analyse this issue in relation to the prevalence of the term ‘engineering policy’ in contrast to ‘science policy’ as a means of demonstrating the nature of the different treatment of these concepts inside the academy and outside. We show that ‘engineering policy’ as a term has almost no academic inquiry relative to science policy, and that even ‘engineering’ is marginalised in critical social science domains like Science and Technology Studies, as others have noted. Further, we extend this exploration with regard to the visibility of engineering policy in practice communities where it ought to be visible but isn't. Specifically, we use the UK government and governance communities as a space to show how engineering and policy for engineering remain side-lined in policy practice. Given how central engineering is to society, the obscurity of its governance mechanisms and the absence of critical scrutiny of engineering policy, we propose a research and action agenda as a means of stimulating action and coalescing a community of stakeholders to redress this situation with some urgency.

Suggested Citation

  • Cooper, Adam C.G. & Lioté, Laurent & Colomer, Chloé, 2023. "We need to talk about engineering policy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:72:y:2023:i:c:s0160791x23000015
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X23000015
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter D. Gluckman & Anne Bardsley & Matthias Kaiser, 2021. "Brokerage at the science–policy interface: from conceptual framework to practical guidance," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Peter Gluckman, 2014. "Policy: The art of science advice to government," Nature, Nature, vol. 507(7491), pages 163-165, March.
    3. Marc Levinson, 2016. "The Box: How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 2, number 10724.
    4. Jeff Tollefson, 2019. "Geoengineering debate shifts to UN environment assembly," Nature, Nature, vol. 567(7747), pages 156-156, March.
    5. Anna Lou Abatayo & Valentina Bosetti & Marco Casari & Riccardo Ghidoni & Massimo Tavoni, 2020. "Solar geoengineering may lead to excessive cooling and high strategic uncertainty," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(24), pages 13393-13398, June.
    6. Marc Levinson, 2016. "The World the Box Made," Introductory Chapters, in: The Box: How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger, Princeton University Press.
    7. Baum, Chad M. & Low, Sean & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2022. "Between the sun and us: Expert perceptions on the innovation, policy, and deep uncertainties of space-based solar geoengineering," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas Baur & Lisandra Flach & Jasmin Katrin Gröschl, 2021. "Container Shipping in Stormy Times – Analysis and Outlook," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 74(05), pages 59-65, May.
    2. Panagiotis Ypsilantis & Rob Zuidwijk, 2019. "Collaborative Fleet Deployment and Routing for Sustainable Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-26, October.
    3. Bauer, Johannes M., 2018. "The Internet and income inequality: Socio-economic challenges in a hyperconnected society," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 333-343.
    4. Takuma Matsuda & Suguru Otani, 2022. "Unified Container Shipping Industry Data From 1966: Freight Rate, Shipping Quantity, Newbuilding, Secondhand, and Scrap Price," Papers 2211.16292, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    5. Ernest Czermański & Giuseppe T. Cirella & Aneta Oniszczuk-Jastrząbek & Barbara Pawłowska & Theo Notteboom, 2021. "An Energy Consumption Approach to Estimate Air Emission Reductions in Container Shipping," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Alejandra Gómez-Padilla & Rosa G. González-Ramírez & Fernando Alarcón & Stefan Voß, 2021. "An option contract model for leasing containers in the shipping industry," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(2), pages 328-347, June.
    7. Niclas Hoffmann & Robert Stahlbock & Stefan Voß, 2020. "A decision model on the repair and maintenance of shipping containers," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Gerhard Streicher & Andreas Reinstaller, 2021. "Die Auswirkungen der Digitalisierung in der Industrie auf den Gütertransport in Österreich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 67332, April.
    9. Camélia Dadouchi & Bruno Agard, 2021. "Recommender systems as an agility enabler in supply chain management," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 1229-1248, June.
    10. Peter North, 2017. "Local economies of Brexit," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(3), pages 204-218, May.
    11. Shih-Liang Chao & Hsin-Cheng Kang & Hsin-Yi Wei Chen, 2019. "Applying data envelopment analysis to evaluate of operational efficiency of the container terminals," Journal of Advances in Technology and Engineering Research, A/Professor Akbar A. Khatibi, vol. 5(4), pages 174-179.
    12. Notteboom, Theo E. & Parola, Francesco & Satta, Giovanni & Pallis, Athanasios A., 2017. "The relationship between port choice and terminal involvement of alliance members in container shipping," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 158-173.
    13. Nowińska, Agnieszka & Schramm, Hans-Joachim, 2021. "Uncertainty, status-based homophily, versatility, repeat exchange and social exchange in the container shipping industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 524-536.
    14. Håkon Osland Sandvik & David Sjödin & Thomas Brekke & Vinit Parida, 2022. "Inherent paradoxes in the shift to autonomous solutions provision: a multilevel investigation of the shipping industry," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(2), pages 227-255, June.
    15. Jaller, Miguel & Otero-Palencia, Carlos & D’Agostino, Mollie, 2022. "Jobs and Automated Freight Transportation: How Automation Affects the Freight Industry and What to Do About It," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0vk5t0rw, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    16. Rosolino A. Candela & Peter J. Jacobsen & Kacey Reeves, 2022. "Malcom McLean, containerization and entrepreneurship," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 35(4), pages 445-465, December.
    17. Gmeiner, Robert & Gmeiner, Michael, 2021. "Encouraging domestic innovation by protecting foreign intellectual property," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    18. B. Adenso-Díaz & N. García Álvarez & J. A. Lago Alba, 2020. "A fuzzy AHP classification of container terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(2), pages 218-238, June.
    19. Peter A.G. van Bergeijk, 2019. "Deglobalization 2.0," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18560.
    20. Marta Gonzalez-Aregall & Kevin Cullinane & Inge Vierth, 2021. "A Review of Port Initiatives to Promote Freight Modal Shifts in Europe: Evidence from Port Governance Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:72:y:2023:i:c:s0160791x23000015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.