IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/techno/v102y2021ics0166497220300845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling the network economy: A population ecology perspective on network dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Jin
  • Peng, Biyu
  • Cornelissen, Joep

Abstract

Network platforms are increasingly important in current economic ecosystems. With industries, platforms and organizations integrating in many directions, the difficulties of defining the boundaries of organizational populations increase. Although population ecologists have frequently applied legitimation and competition mechanisms to analyze inside the organizational population, there is little understanding of the transition of such mechanisms across populations and whether competition mechanisms vary in mixed populations. This paper therefore builds on recent work in community ecology and proposes a Platform System Dependence Model, which involves a re-specification of these mechanisms and offers a theoretical framework that is suitable for heterogeneous organizational populations and sufficiently adapted to the dynamic nature of the network economy. Furthermore, in order to describe and analyze how different organizational populations interact within the ecosystem, we expand traditional population and community ecology models to time-related differential equations. This change makes it possible to perform a comprehensive density-trend analysis that can be applied within and across different categories of populations. We furthermore offer a simulation based on this framework, which supports the thesis that the density of a symbiotic organizational population and a competitive organizational population increases rapidly in the initial stage of organizational population growth, while, at the same time, the platform-based organizational population increases gradually. As the density of a symbiotic population decreases and the competitive population density remains stable, the density of the platform-based organizational population decreases after reaching its maximum. We discuss the implications of these findings for research on ecology and on the platform economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Jin & Peng, Biyu & Cornelissen, Joep, 2021. "Modelling the network economy: A population ecology perspective on network dynamics," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:102:y:2021:i:c:s0166497220300845
    DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497220300845
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102212?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruutu, Sampsa & Casey, Thomas & Kotovirta, Ville, 2017. "Development and competition of digital service platforms: A system dynamics approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 119-130.
    2. Çakmaklı, Anıl Divarcı & Boone, Christophe & van Witteloostuijn, Arjen, 2020. "Identity realization, multiple logics and legitimacy: Organizational foundings during the emergence of the Dutch accounting industry," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Marcus Box, 2017. "Bring in the brewers: business entry in the Swedish brewing industry from 1830 to 2012," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(5), pages 710-743, July.
    4. Chaohong Zhou & Arjen van Witteloostuijn, 2010. "Institutional constraints and ecological processes: Evolution of foreign-invested enterprises in the Chinese construction industry, 1993–2006," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 41(3), pages 539-556, April.
    5. César García-Díaz & Arjen van Witteloostuijn & Gábor Péli, 2015. "Micro-Level Adaptation, Macro-Level Selection, and the Dynamics of Market Partitioning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-27, December.
    6. Elizabeth G. Pontikes & William P. Barnett, 2015. "The Persistence of Lenient Market Categories," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1415-1431, October.
    7. César García-Díaz & Gábor Péli & Arjen van Witteloostuijn, 2020. "The coevolution of the firm and the product attribute space," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, June.
    8. Alessandro Lomi & Erik R. Larsen & Filippo Carlo Wezel, 2010. "Getting There: Exploring the Role of Expectations and Preproduction Delays in Processes of Organizational Founding," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 132-149, February.
    9. César García-Díaz & Arjen Van Witteloostuijn & Gábor Péli, 2008. "Market Dimensionality And The Proliferation Of Small-Scale Firms," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(02), pages 231-247.
    10. Tal Simons & Paul Ingram, 2004. "An ecology of ideology: theory and evidence from four populations," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 13(1), pages 33-59, February.
    11. Deborah Dougherty & Danielle D. Dunne, 2011. "Organizing Ecologies of Complex Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1214-1223, October.
    12. Jean-Frédéric Morin, 2020. "Concentration despite competition: The organizational ecology of technical assistance providers," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 75-107, January.
    13. Martin Ruef, 2004. "For whom the bell tolls: ecological perspectives on industrial decline and resurgence," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 13(1), pages 61-89, February.
    14. Alessandro Lomi & Erik R. Larsen & John H. Freeman, 2005. "Things Change: Dynamic Resource Constraints and System-Dependent Selection in the Evolution of Organizational Populations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(6), pages 882-903, June.
    15. Richard F. J. Haans, 2019. "What's the value of being different when everyone is? The effects of distinctiveness on performance in homogeneous versus heterogeneous categories," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 3-27, January.
    16. Yan Zhang & Haiyang Li & Claudia Bird Schoonhoven, 2009. "Intercommunity relationships and community growth in China's high technology industries 1988–2000," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 163-183, February.
    17. Pontikes, Elizabeth G. & Barnett, William P., 2015. "The Persistence of Lenient Market Categories," Research Papers 3002, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    18. Rudy Arthur & Arwen Nicholson & Paolo Sibani & Michael Christensen, 2017. "The Tangled Nature Model for organizational ecology," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-31, March.
    19. Michael T. Hannan & László Pólos & Glenn R. Carroll, 2007. "Language Matters, from Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies," Introductory Chapters, in: Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies, Princeton University Press.
    20. John Freeman & Erik R. Larsen & Alessandro Lomi, 2012. "Why is there no cannery in 'Cannery Row'? Exploring a behavioral simulation model of population extinction," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 21(1), pages 99-125, February.
    21. C. Marlene Fiol & Elaine Romanelli, 2012. "Before Identity: The Emergence of New Organizational Forms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 597-611, June.
    22. Min Liu & Arjen Witteloostuijn, 2020. "Emergence of entrepreneurial populations: a feature dimensionality approach," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 971-989, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elzbieta Szaruga & Elzbieta Zaloga, 2021. "Global Network Economy Society: Information Needs on the Ethical Framework and Trust in Transportation and Logistics Business among Users of the Google Search Engine," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 835-849.
    2. Duan, Wenqi & Li, Chen, 2023. "Be alert to dangers: Collapse and avoidance strategies of platform ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Jin Xu & Joep Cornelissen, 2023. "Disequilibrium and complexity across scales: a patch-dynamics framework for organizational ecology," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth George Pontikes, 2022. "Category innovation in the software industry: 1990–2002," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(9), pages 1697-1727, September.
    2. Jürgen Lerner & Alessandro Lomi, 2018. "Knowledge categorization affects popularity and quality of Wikipedia articles," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Oertel, Simon, 2014. "Density imprints and organisations’ survival chances: a question of organisational ancestors," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 19(1), pages 81-105.
    4. Martina Montauti & Filippo Carlo Wezel, 2016. "Charting the Territory: Recombination as a Source of Uncertainty for Potential Entrants," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 954-971, August.
    5. Helen Haugh & Paul Robson & John Hagedoorn & Kate Sugar, 2022. "The nascent ecology of social enterprise," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 1223-1242, March.
    6. Gavin M. Schwarz & Kuo-Pin Yang & Christine Chou & Yu-Jen Chiu, 2020. "A classification of structural inertia: Variations in structural response," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 33-63, March.
    7. Diane-Laure Arjaliès & Rodolphe Durand, 2019. "Product Categories as Judgment Devices: The Moral Awakening of the Investment Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 885-911, September.
    8. Rousselière, Damien & Joly, Iragäel, 2011. "A propos de la capacité à survivre des coopératives : une étude de la relation entre âge et mortalité des organisations coopératives agricoles françaises," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 92(3).
    9. Hu, Chenguang & Li, Jiatao & Yun, Kyung Hwan, 2023. "Re-examining foreign subsidiary survival in a transition economy: Impact of market identity overlap and conflict," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(3).
    10. Hao Ren & Rongrong Wang & Suopeng Zhang & An Zhang, 2017. "How Do Internet Enterprises Obtain Sustainable Development of Organizational Ecology? A Case Study of LeEco Using Institutional Logic Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-21, August.
    11. Ryan W. Angus, 2019. "Problemistic search distance and entrepreneurial performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(12), pages 2011-2023, December.
    12. Buhr, Helena & Funk, Russell J. & Owen-Smith, Jason, 2021. "The authenticity premium: Balancing conformity and innovation in high technology industries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    13. Danielle Logue & Matthew Grimes, 2022. "Platforms for the people: Enabling civic crowdfunding through the cultivation of institutional infrastructure," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 663-693, March.
    14. César García-Díaz & Gábor Péli & Arjen van Witteloostuijn, 2020. "The coevolution of the firm and the product attribute space," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, June.
    15. Marc van de Wardt & Joost Berkhout & Floris Vermeulen, 2017. "Ecologies of ideologies: Explaining party entry and exit in West-European parliaments, 1945–2013," European Union Politics, , vol. 18(2), pages 239-259, June.
    16. David G. McKendrick & Michael T. Hannan, 2014. "Oppositional Identities and Resource Partitioning: Distillery Ownership in Scotch Whisky, 1826–2009," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1272-1286, August.
    17. Xueting Jiang & Bogdan Prokopovych & Garett DiStefano, 2022. "Leveraging A Lenient Category in Practicing Responsible Leadership: A Case Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(2), pages 413-425, November.
    18. Lo, Jade Y. & Nag, Rajiv & Xu, Lei & Agung, Shanti D., 2020. "Organizational innovation efforts in multiple emerging market categories: Exploring the interplay of opportunity, ambiguity, and socio-cognitive contexts," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    19. Paolo Aversa & Annelore Huyghe & Giulia Bonadio, 2021. "First Impressions Stick: Market Entry Strategies and Category Priming in the Digital Domain," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(7), pages 1721-1760, November.
    20. Min Liu & Arjen Witteloostuijn, 2020. "Emergence of entrepreneurial populations: a feature dimensionality approach," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 971-989, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:102:y:2021:i:c:s0166497220300845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01664972 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.