IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/streco/v62y2022icp430-440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural consumption in times of lock-down: An agent-based model of choice

Author

Listed:
  • Biondo, Alessio Emanuele
  • Cellini, Roberto
  • Cuccia, Tiziana

Abstract

This paper presents an agent-based model to study the effects of lockdown restrictions, due to epidemic prevention, on cultural consumption. Two kinds of cultural products, designed as ’popular’ and ’highbrow’, are taken into account. People preferences and choices on different cultural products are influenced by individual education and income; the presence of imitative behaviour through social networks is also considered. Numerical simulations show that partial and global lockdown restrictions produce different –and sometimes counter-intuitive– effects. In particular, highbrow activities are affected by adverse economic consequences of partial lockdown measures to a larger extent, as compared to popular cultural activities. The result is driven by factors related to both the demand and the supply side.

Suggested Citation

  • Biondo, Alessio Emanuele & Cellini, Roberto & Cuccia, Tiziana, 2022. "Cultural consumption in times of lock-down: An agent-based model of choice," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 430-440.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:streco:v:62:y:2022:i:c:p:430-440
    DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2022.06.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954349X22000935
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.06.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Tinbergen, 1972. "The Impact Of Education On Income Distribution," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 18(3), pages 255-265, September.
    2. Lengnick, Matthias, 2013. "Agent-based macroeconomics: A baseline model," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 102-120.
    3. Natascha Notten & Bram Lancee & Herman Werfhorst & Harry Ganzeboom, 2015. "Educational stratification in cultural participation: cognitive competence or status motivation?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 39(2), pages 177-203, May.
    4. James Heilbrun, 1997. "The Competition between High Culture and Popular Culture as Seen in the New York Times," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 21(1), pages 29-40, March.
    5. Sara Suarez-Fernandez & Juan Prieto-Rodriguez & Maria Jose Perez-Villadoniga, 2020. "The changing role of education as we move from popular to highbrow culture," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(2), pages 189-212, June.
    6. Xavier Castañer & Lorenzo Campos, 2002. "The Determinants of Artistic Innovation: Bringing in the Role of Organizations," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 26(1), pages 29-52, February.
    7. Domenico Delli Gatti & Severin Reissl & Enrico Turco, 2023. "V for vaccines and variants," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 991-1046, September.
    8. Roberto Cellini & Tiziana Cuccia, 2003. "Incomplete Information and Experimentation in the Arts: A Game Theory Approach," Economia politica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 21-34.
    9. Tinbergen, Jan, 1972. "The Impact of Education on Income Distribution," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 18(3), pages 255-265, September.
    10. Seaman, Bruce A, 2006. "Empirical Studies of Demand for the Performing Arts," Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, in: V.A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 14, pages 415-472, Elsevier.
    11. Throsby, David, 1994. "The Production and Consumption of the Arts: A View of Cultural Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 32(1), pages 1-29, March.
    12. Becker, Gary S & Murphy, Kevin M, 1988. "A Theory of Rational Addiction," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 96(4), pages 675-700, August.
    13. Kubota, So & Onishi, Koichiro & Toyama, Yuta, 2021. "Consumption responses to COVID-19 payments: Evidence from a natural experiment and bank account data," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 1-17.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessio Emanuele Biondo & Roberto Cellini & Tiziana Cuccia, 2020. "Choices on museum attendance: An agent‐based approach," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(4), pages 882-897, November.
    2. Caterina Adelaide Mauri & Alexander Wolf, 2016. "Household Decisions on Arts Consumption: How Men Can Avoid the Ballet," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2016-36, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Sara Suarez-Fernandez & Juan Prieto-Rodriguez & Maria Jose Perez-Villadoniga, 2020. "The changing role of education as we move from popular to highbrow culture," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(2), pages 189-212, June.
    4. Lunn, Pete & Kelly, Elish, 2009. "Accounting for Taste: An Examination of Socioeconomic Gradients in Attendance at Arts Events," Papers WP283, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    5. Caterina Adelaide Mauri & Alexander Friedrich Wolf, 2021. "Battle of the ballet household decisions on arts consumption," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(3), pages 359-383, September.
    6. Victor Nyatefe & Mawussé Nézan Komlagan Okey, 2020. "Analyse de la consommation des biens culturels au Togo," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 32(1), pages 80-95, March.
    7. Bruce Seaman, 2004. "Competition and the Non-Profit Arts: The Lost Industrial Organization Agenda," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 28(3), pages 167-193, August.
    8. Ghosh, sudeshna, 2017. "Education Attainment Forecasting and Economic Inequality United States," MPRA Paper 89712, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Kristien Werck & Bruno Heyndels & Benny Geys, 2008. "The impact of ‘central places’ on spatial spending patterns: evidence from Flemish local government cultural expenditures," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(1), pages 35-58, March.
    10. Borowiecki, Karol J. & Bakhshi, Hasan, 2018. "Did you really take a hit? Understanding how video games playing affects individuals," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 313-326.
    11. Victor Fernandez-Blanco & Juan Prieto-Rodriguez & Javier Suarez-Pandiello, 2015. "A quantitative analysis of reading habits," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-05-2015, Association for Cultural Economics International, revised May 2015.
    12. Laurence Kranich, 2022. "Affective social policy," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 24(2), pages 362-379, April.
    13. Victor Ginsburgh, 2013. "Mark Blaug and the economics of the arts," Chapters, in: Marcel Boumans & Matthias Klaes (ed.), Mark Blaug: Rebel with Many Causes, chapter 15, pages 208-224, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Anthony Boardman & Shaun Hargreaves-Heap, 1999. "Network Externalities and Government Restrictions on Satellite Broadcasting of Key Sporting Events," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 23(3), pages 165-179, August.
    15. Anne-Célia Disdier & Silvio Tai & Lionel Fontagné & Thierry Mayer, 2010. "Bilateral trade of cultural goods," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 145(4), pages 575-595, January.
    16. Andrea Baldin & Trine Bille & Andrea Ellero & Daniela Favaretto, 2016. "Multiobjective optimization model for pricing and seat allocation problem in non profit performing arts organization," Working Papers 20, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    17. Xiao, Han & Zheng, Xinye & Xie, Lunyu, 2022. "Promoting pro-poor growth through infrastructure investment: Evidence from the Targeted Poverty Alleviation program in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    18. Michael Getzner, 2020. "Spatially Disaggregated Cultural Consumption: Empirical Evidence of Cultural Sustainability from Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, December.
    19. Nadia Campaniello & Matteo Richiardi, 2018. "The role of museums in bilateral tourist flows: evidence from Italy," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 70(3), pages 658-679.
    20. E. Bertacchini & A. Venturini & R. Zotti, 2022. "Drivers of cultural participation of immigrants: evidence from an Italian survey," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 46(1), pages 57-100, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agent-based model; Covid-19; Lockdown; Highbrow vs. popular arts;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques
    • D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
    • D85 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Network Formation
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:streco:v:62:y:2022:i:c:p:430-440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/525148 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.